1. You people want to kill straight cis people right?
2. After you kill the straight cis people are you going to kill the gay non-queer cis people?
>>8766136
sub-par IQ detected
Every wild and random accusation a /pol/ack throws at me, I know is just projection, in reality, they are the ones who wish to kill me.
unironical yes to both
t. sjw
>allowing a boy to express feelings besides rage and happiness is bad
>encouraging kids to find their own identity is bad
>giving a boy positive role models is bad
>teaching anyone how to function well in society is bad
wew
>>8766136
>You people want to kill straight cis people right?
No. We want to civilise them.
>>8766136
I don't see how any of these things in the pic have to do with feminism. Also, I don't understand what "let him cry" means. It's not like the average parent is beating their son for crying.
>>8766173
>>8766165
It's a well known fact that men are held to a different standard than women when it comes to emotional expression. Men are seen as the providers of society, so any weakness they show is immediately turned on because it makes people uncomfortable. Thankfully this isn't as bad as it used to be, but social programming is real.
And I'm an afab so don't go thinking this is mgtow speak or whatever
>>8766173
>showing a webm of a straight kid with his straight parents
>see us straights are civilised
Yeah indeed it seems we have a different definition of civilisation.
Whoring your kid out for the sake of diversity is not in mine, but apparently it's in yours.
I don't judge (out loud).
>>8766184
>male privilege
just stop