What's the lore behind gays' typing so fucking annoyingly?

>>8734759
yassss qween grill them bitch throw that shade momma

Lol boi werk. I just can't even. I can't. omg hunny you getting me so worked up imma need jesus gurl yas

>>8734759
>i'm bi
Well, at least that explain why you're such a heartless cunt.

>>8735035
Uhm why

>I'm bi before you ask
no one is asking you limp dick bi boi

>>8734759
They're a bunch of fags.

>>8734759
That thread is too funny, it's full of short and fat people. I feel kinda bad for laughing tbqh. Also, leave the gays alone OP, let them talk how they want.
I'm also bi.

>>8735035
/thread

File: 1460582833330.jpg (42KB, 480x670px) Image search: [Google]

42KB, 480x670px

>>8734759
Why do straight people feel the need to come and post here claiming they're bi but we all know they're like at most 3% attracted to the same sex

>>8736462
I'm actually 0% attracted to the same sex, but I say I'm bi anyway so people don't yell at me in the threads and ask why I'm here. (Don't ask). Also at one point I thought I might be gay cause I'd be willing to date post and pre op transgender women (on the condition they become post op).

File: bii.png (105KB, 1517x529px) Image search: [Google]

105KB, 1517x529px

>>8736462
>actual bi fag
>no one will ever believe you

feels bad

File: 1493264088885.jpg (59KB, 529x437px) Image search: [Google]

59KB, 529x437px

>>8736541
>implying shota is gay
>implying that gfur folder isn't full of futa horsecock trap shit

>>8736571
How is shota not gay?

Also here's the first 30ish images from my gfur folder

http://imgur.com/a/soH5N

>>8736585
OwO what's this? *notices your autism*

>>8736462
>>8736571
An avatarfag being stupid, what a surprise. I don't understand gays' hate for bis. Is it a jealousy thing

>>8736585
Have you seen shota though? It's just a way to make futa realistic because they're kids and not mature men.

>>8736628
You seem to have a very poor understanding of both futa and shota my friendo.

>>8736628
I dunno what you mean.

What does this have to do with futa? http://imgur.com/a/KitfL

>>8736642
Shota is futa, but futa is not shota. Just like a square is a rectangle, but a rectangle is not a square.

>>8736571
>futa
>gay

>>8736654
>Shota is futa
Please see: >>8736642

>>8736648
>posting the exceptions
https://myreadingmanga.info/genre/shota/

>>8736662
Again, shota is futa, but not all futa are shota.

Futa are """"women"""" with dicks. To make those futa realistic and believable, some artists draw them young, hence it's shota, but still futa.

>>8736664
Just cause a lot of people like trap shit doesn't make it the only stuff that's out there, also it doesn't change the definition of shota. (which has litterally nothing to do with futa)

>>8736678
Once again, see: >>8736642
You clearly have a very poor surface level understanding of this subject.

File: 654365436543.jpg (28KB, 330x268px) Image search: [Google]

28KB, 330x268px

are there any shitposters in here today

>>8736678
Let me lay this out for you you stupid motherfucker:
Futa: women with dicks, very often have both a penis and a vagina.
Trap: fem girly boys dressed as girls/transwomen
Shota: little boys

Don't talk about shit you don't know bout

>>8734759
The examples in that thread aren't even that bad. Did you really have to be bitter enough to make a thread about it?

File: IMG_0825.jpg (54KB, 1033x679px) Image search: [Google]

54KB, 1033x679px

>>8736585
>>8736541
>pic related.

I get that feel, more so becuase i'm more into girly guys/traps.

>lolnotbi

Why does it mater how much you lean towards each gender to some people or if you have a prefrence? I just want someone to be happy with, as we all do.

>>8736679
>Just cause a lot of people like trap shit doesn't make it the only stuff that's out there
no disagreement there

>shota has nothing to do with futa
shota are drawn boys being depicted as women. it's futa

>>8736698
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shotacon
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Futanari

lurk more please

>>8736682
keep pointing it there, bud. Doesn't change the fact that shota is futa.

>>8736541
>pedo and furry shit
Disgusting. Are you trying to confirm the stereotype that all bis are degenerates?

>>8736698
>>8736704
Please revisit this post right here: >>8736642

>>8736692
But have you seen shota art though. They're mostly drawn as """"women"""" with dicks. Also, traps are """"girls"""" with dicks. They're called traps because you thought they're girl at first until he's naked.

>>8736705
Yes and no, I was trying to dispel the stereotype that bi people are actually gay or straight and are just fence sitting.

I can't however dispel the stereotype that all bis are degenerates cause it's 100% true!

>>8736712
Futas are girls and women with dicks, not """"""girls""""""" or """"""""women"""""'

Traps are """""girls""""" or """""women""""" who are physically boys: hence girly cross dressing boys/transwomen.

Shota are little boys, sometimes they're traps, but they can't be futa.

Get this through your head you dense motherfucker.

>>8736706
>keeps pointing to that "no you're wrong" post
Whatever helps you sleep at night, bud.

File: 3213128903120.png (1MB, 1277x719px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1277x719px

>>8734759
They're pathetic gay ass faggots

>>8736723
Maybe I wouldn't need to keep pointing you to a post saying you're wrong if you stopped saying shit that's wrong.

An on that note, why don't you take a little gander over here: >>8736642

>>8736722
Futa and traps are feminine men. They have dicks for crying out loud. So are most shota because they haven't matured yet.

>>8736541
I'm the OP of >>>8736300
People are just too retarded to believe it's humanly possible to like two things at once. I blame their low iq's

>>8736734
>Futa and traps are feminine men

Nope. Futa are women with penises, they're not trans or traps. They're just women that by the will of fictional cartoon porn fetish mumbo jumbo have penises. Traps are the feminine men/boys who present themselves as women.

File: 2908.jpg (8KB, 300x180px) Image search: [Google]

8KB, 300x180px

>>8736733
Sure thing bud. You're """"right"""".

>>8736737
it's impossible, you either like men or women, you just want to break poor gayboy hearts

>>8736745
>Sure thing bud. You're right.

Damn straight, I'm glad we could finally come to an agreement on this. Hopefully you'll remember to get educated next time you want to try and talk hentai on this website, because this is the big leagues, we don't accept posers here. You either talk jap porn with the best, or you hang with the re(ddit)st.

>>8736742
That's one hardcore double-think, batman.

A person with a dick is a man. We identify people with their genitals. Someone with a dick is a man, while someone with a pussy is a woman. Are you still with me in this one?

A feminine man who looks like a woman is a trap because you thought he's a girl, but not not really. So, a futa is also a feminine """"woman""" but he has a dick. They're the same, except traps needed to hide at first.

>>8736756
Goddamn I feel bad for you for thinking "women" with dicks are actually women.

>>8736764
>We identify people with their genitals.
"Hello Unit 1147-alpha, I trust you're packing a proper cawk under there, right?"

Wew lad. I usually just use names to identify people and their presented personalities to identify their social roles.

>>8736774
>ignores why we call certain men "traps"

>>8736764
Typically futa has both a penis and a vag, they're not born male, they have boobs, frequently they're women who grew a dick via magic, but they're not traps and they're not men. Trying to debate this is like refusing to believe in tentacle rape because raping tentacles don't exist in real life. It's ignorant.

>They're the same, except traps need to hide at first

And also futa are women vs traps who are boys. Important distinction and enough of one that we can assuredly say, futa are not traps.

File: full.jpg (31KB, 373x667px) Image search: [Google]

31KB, 373x667px

>>8736764
cartoons can be whatever they want to be

STOP IT WITH THE AUTHORITARIANISM REEEEEEEE

WHY GAY GUYS SUCH LITERAL FAGGOTS REEEe

>>8736769
t. Can't separate reality from fictional porn.

Why don't you ponder this ancient Chinese proverb a Wiseman once said: >>8736642

>>8736488
>and ask why I'm here. (Don't ask).
Why are you here anon?

>>8736778
Again. Futa are fake women with dicks. Growing a dick via magic is niche and an exception to the rule. They're mostly draw, again, as fake women with dicks. I'm not saying it's wrong, I'm just saying they're the same as traps.

>>8736787
And you live in a fantasy world where someone with a penis is a woman.

Why don't you ponder this ancient Chinese proverb a Wiseman once said: >>8736734

>>8736808
You are wrong. Futa have both. They're not fake women, they're women with dicks, whereas traps are boys in women's clothing, they might look similar to someone who doesn't know what they are talking about, but they are very much not the same thing.
>>8736810
>And you live in a fantasy world where someone with a penis is a woman

I mean you're not doing much to disprove his claim that you can't separate reality from fiction.

>>8736810
Here buddy lemme help you out: >>8736642

>>8736814
I agree that drawn futa/trap porn are fiction. I'm just arguing that you're using the terms wrong. And Futa are still men because they have dicks. Futa with pussies are just exception to the rule.

>>8736814
Protip: imaginary anime characters aren't real

>>8736821
Thanks! Let me help you too >>8736734

>>8736825
>you're using the terms wrong
Haha, says the motherfucker who can't differentiate between shota/trap/futa.
>Futa with pussies are just exception to the rule
Nope, anything otherwise is the exception.
>>8736828
Exactly, which is why they can be women with dicks. Shit's fiction, anything is possible.

>>8736830
Linking me to a post where you demonstrate a poor understanding of futa and traps isn't going to make: >>8736642 any less true. If anything it will only reaffirm the fact that you don't know what you're talking about.

>>8736839
Linking me to a post where you demonstrate a poor understanding of futa and traps isn't going to make: >>8736734 any less true. If anything it will only reaffirm the fact that you don't know what you're talking about.

>>8736835
Calling someone with a dick a woman even in fiction is delusional. Should a drawn chair be called a cabinet just because I said so? That's literally double-think, my guy.

>>8736847
Ah, I see you've taken up mimicking in the hopes that it'll make it so you're also the winner of this argument(me). Though cute and endearing it doesn't work that way. See the reason why I'm the winner of this argument is because I'm right, not because of how I say it. Please see this post for more information: >>8736642

>>8736857
Apparently you don't know what fiction means.

>>8736857
It's not just someone with a dick though, it's a woman with a vagina and also a dick. Important distinction that you seem to be missing.

>>8736858
>Ah, I see you've taken up mimicking in the hopes that it'll make it so you're also the winner of this argument(me). Though cute and endearing it doesn't work that way. See the reason why I'm the winner of this argument is because I'm right, not because of how I say it. Please see this post for more information: >>8736734

>>8736865
>greentexting so I can't even click the link

I see you've admitted defeat. I'll be on my way then.

>>8736862
Fiction is a made up story, but if I call a chair a table, the sun the moon, and a man a woman, it's still retarded.

>>8736868
Thanks for admitting that you're wrong.

>>8736872
That's false equivalence. What you're more doing is seeing something that is simultaneously a chair and a drawer but refusing to acknowledge half of that equation, instead insisting that it is only a chair with no drawer like qualities.

>>8736876
Well I'm never afraid to admit it when I'm right. I'm just glad that you're able to be so humble in the face of defeat, it shows character. Now you better run along, no point in hanging around being a buttsore loser.

>>8736881
>calling it false equivalence
a chair with a compartment and is often used as a container doesn't make it a drawer, even if it's used as one. Same with feminine men.

>>8736891
Holy shit you're retarded.

>>8736892
>a chair with a compartment and is often used as a container doesn't make it a drawer

A woman with a penis that is frequently used for sex doesn't make it a man, even if it's used as one. Same with a chair with a drawer on it.

>>8736900
A man that looks and acts like a woman doesn't make him a woman. Same with a chair with a drawer on it.

>>8736894
I get your frustrated at losing the argument but that doesn't mean ya gotta lash out.

>>8736541
>Hurrr im pseudo-pedophile trap hunter
you see this why i dont date your kind

>>8736911
Using circular logic and being proud of it actually makes you retarded.

>>8736904
A futanari isn't a man that looks and acts like a woman though. A futa is a woman who has a penis despite being in every other way(including having a vagina) a woman.
>Same with a chair with a drawer on it
Exactly, a chair with the added functionality of a drawer is still a chair, a woman with the added functionality of a man is still a woman.

>>8736918
God, so much namecalling, don't be a sore loser, accept defeat like a man.

>>8734759
S-Stop biphobia!!!!!!!!!!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SsiL-HnVtJk&t=557s

>>8734759
A woman on a chair with a penis in a drawer is a woman.

>>8736918
>>8736925
>I'm right!
>nuh uh!
>*repeats ten million times*
>well I win
>no ur stoopid

May I put forth the assertion that both of you are retarded?

>>8736921
Futa is literally just a shorter term for futanari
>a chair with the added functionality of a drawer is still a chair
At least we can agree on that one. And a man that dress and act like a woman doesn't make it a woman.

>>8736935
>Futa is literally just a shorter term for futanari
I know this anon. But do you know the definition of futanari? No. You don't.
>a man that dress and act like a woman doesn't make it a woman
That's nice and all, but this argument isn't about traps(men who dress and behave as women) but futas, which are a separate and different thing.

>>8736925
>namecalling
It's a fact that you're literally retarded though.

>>8736946
It's also a fact that I've won this argument :^)

>>8736941
Ugh. We're back to the same argument. At least we both agree that futa=futanari.

And again, a person with a dick is a man. If he acts and dress like a girl, he's a futa. If a man thought he was a girl at first, the fake girl is a trap.

>>8736951
Dude, I'm actually concerned about you. You should go check yourself up because there's something wrong with your head.

>>8736958
>If he acts and dress like a girl, he's a futa
That's a trap. That is what a trap is. That isn't futa. Here let me help you out lets take a little looksie at the Wikipedia article on this subject
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Futanari
Here I'll even greentext some relevant stuff since I know you won't look on your own
> is the Japanese word for hermaphroditism
> the term is used to describe a commonly pornographic genre of eroge, comics, and anime which includes characters that show both primary sexual characteristics.[1] In today's language it refers almost exclusively to characters who have an overall feminine body, but have both female and male genitalia

A man in womans clothing is not a futa.

>>8736962
What I'm concerned about is how much of a sore loser you are. How are you ever gonna make it in the world if you throw a hissy fit everytime you lose an argument?

>>8736975
That's the historic meaning of Futa though. That's just like saying a fag still meant a bunch of sticks. They're still mostly known as dick girls if you check urban dictionary.
http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=FUTA
>short for futanari, which, in the hentai community, is a dick girl. A being that has the body of a female and the genetelia of a stallion.

>>8737004
A futa is a dickgirl. Not a man, but a girl with a dick, and no that's not the "historic" definition of futa. That is a wikipedia article about a genre of hentai. Futa and trap are two different things, futa and crossdressing boys are two different things.
I would say if your argument now revolves around citing urban dictionary it's probably on its last legs, but here lets see what we get when we type 'futanari' into urban dictionary
http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Futanari
" A genre or character in art or literature that features a female that has all feminine attributes except that she has a penis. This can include her having a vagina, testicles, etc. so long as she has a penis. A futanari girl is not to be confused with a trap or cross-dresser as they are a female."
Well would you look at that. Is this why you linked me to their definition of 'futa' instead of 'futanari'?

>>8737031
Again even if we search the term 'futanari' in the urban dictionary
>CAN include her having a vagina, testicles, etc
that means it's optional

Now pay attention on this part
>so long as she has a penis

And again, someone with a dick is a man.

>>8737057
How nice of you to gloss over the important part
>A futanari girl is not to be confused with a trap or cross-dresser as they are a female

Wikipedia disagrees with you, urbandictionary disagrees with you, the type of porn you get when you search "futanari" on a hentai website disagrees with you. At this point you're pretty much just in denial my man.

>>8737057
a futa is a fictional character

>>8737073
lmao your fetish is so niche that you can't get think that having a dick makes you a man because you're in a bubble, that you ignored that a vagina is only optional. Literally the most important part of a woman is only optional in a futanari. It's sad.

>>8737077
And, again, fiction is a made up story, but calling a chair a cabinet in fiction is delusional.

>>8737100
>>>8737073 (You)
>lmao your fetish is so niche that you can't get think that having a dick makes you a man because you're in a bubble, that you ignored that a vagina is only optional. Literally the most important part of a woman is only optional in a futanari. It's sad.

Oh my god learn to speak English I actually can't fucking tell what you're trying to say. Anyways if you're done pretending to have any actual basis for your argument can we just go ahead and agree that futas aren't traps aren't shota, and that while not all shota are traps some are, but they can never be futa? Can we agree on that now? Because at this point I don't think you have any real reasons otherwise.

>>8737100
A female brain in a male body is not, by definition, a man.

You can't win this argument.
Let it go.
You lack knowledge.

>>8737181
Oh fuck off this argument is about porn. Like I'm not even disagreeing with you, but this argument is about fucking porn not trans stuff fuck off.

>>8737100
>calling a chair a cabinet in fiction is delusional.

I suppose it depends on your definition of a chair.
If a chair is something you can sit on, and you can sit on a cabinet, then one might call it a chair as well.

If your definition of chair is something that doesn't have drawers, then a cabinet is not a chair.

>>8737144
As long as we can agree that a fictional character that's depicted with a dick is a man, and a pussy in a futa is optional, which makes it a man. A trap is a man in a skirt, and shota are usually drawn as young traps.

>>8737196
Nah, at this point you're just arguing from your feelings and I don't give a fuck. You can't change what words mean just because you feel a certain way. Futa is a woman with a dick, traps a boy in girls clothes, shota is a little boy. That's what those words mean. That's what they're agreed upon to mean. Your feelings have no place in this argument.

>>8734759
i had the book that pictures from as a kid

>>8737215
And, again, a man that only looks like a woman and even still has his dick is a man. Saying that he may have a pussy just makes an exception to the rule. That's the objective truth.

But if you imagine getting dicked by a guy and the only way you can cum is to think "she's a girl" over and over again, I just want to let you know that you're still straight and you just have a fetish. I just hope someday when you're older, that you accept that futa are men.

>>8737254
futa aren't men.
they are imaginary characters.

>>8737254
Futa aren't men. And I certainly don't think about girls when getting fucked I'm a fucking faggot. That's why I'm on this board. My only stake in this is that I have a crush on a straight boy who likes futa.

Anyways futa aren't men who look like women. That's traps. Futa are by definition women with dicks. That's the definition of that shit, women with dicks. You're in denial.

>>8737308
Heracles wasn't a man, he was an imaginary creature

>this shemale fetishist "straight" anti-logic fed by blanchardfaggotry

>>8737314
>Heracles was a cartoon drawing

you're confused

>>8737369

Pay off denbts greek LARPer

File: YOUR KIND IS NOT WELCOME HERE.jpg (62KB, 625x419px) Image search: [Google]

62KB, 625x419px

>>8736488
>I'm actually 0% attracted to the same sex
LEAVE THIS PLACE YOU FOUL ABOMINATION

File: BB9B3A18-067C-42B3-9877-4F915C8ECB3F-165-0000002819B63293.jpg (245KB, 1400x1000px) Image search: [Google]

245KB, 1400x1000px

>>8736352
Gay men are salty because we can love women unlike them.

>>8736797
Because I was bored and autistic gays and trannies make some funny memes.

>>8737387
Ok

>>8734759

It's about letting others know they are gay, so other gays can be gay with them. I fucking hate gay people, makes me want to kill someone everytime I hear them speak like faggots.