Im super interested in women but traps are really interesting to me and i wouldn't mind having sex with one. Does this mean im gay?
>>8666491
It sounds like your a pederast. Your only into males when they're boyish/feminine.
googled it and nah mate not into little boys
>>8666506
Pederast means attraction to adolescent boys, so about 14-21.
Do you consider them girls?
If so, I would say it's not gay. You're having sex with someone who looks like a girl, someone you consider a girl.
If you consider them to be feminine men, it's at least bisexual
yeh nah im not much into that mainly boys who look like girls or women
>>8666520
> boys who look like girls or women
That's just another way of saying boys who look young.
>>8666520
If you're considering them to be boys, then you're bisexual or gay
That's an Asian man so yeah you are super gay, my man.
Also your attraction to his hairless ephebe body makes me think you are a latent pedophile tbqh.
t. armchair psychiatrist
>>8666529
>latent pedophile
Pederast or ephebeophile. Pedophile is attraction to prepubescents, that guy is obviously not prepubescent.
not old enough to be a pedo
>>8666542
That's not how it works, children can be pedophiles.
maybe pic is like not related and maybe op just meant traps in general
>>8666556
Traps in general are just sublimated pederasty. It's just a semi socially acceptable way to indulge in an attraction to teenage boys.
>>8666541
Well considering he wants to have sex with short tiny-framed Asian men who are known for their highly neotenous features (compared to Asians, whites look like rugged cavemen) there is a chance he uses Thai "trap" porn for his pedophile urges tbqh.
>>8666578
Definitely not pedophilia. Asians look young as adults but they do not look prepubescent. Pederasty is the term for attraction to teenage boys.
>>8666565
>My family thinks otherwise but I told them they're retards
E D G E
>>8666565
then bam, you're straight. Meaning you aren't gay
Problem solved
>>8666513
So... Normal sexual intrests?
>>8666652
I didn't say it wasn't normal, that's just the name for it.
>>8666587
>this much denial
Look at the picture OP posted.
Look at it.
Everything about it invokes prepubescence no matter what excuses you are going to use.
If it was pederasty, there would be at least some sign of virility and body hair that is present in teenage boys but in this case there is literally none. Even the penis looks underdeveloped.
>>8666688
Maybe, I would say that no could ever realistically think that person was younger than 14.