Is it acceptable for there to be a double standard, where in, it's okay to be "homophobic" by invalidating trans-lesbian identities, but it's not okay to be """""homophobic"""""" by attacking straight trans women for their personalities and sexuality?
homophobia is a weaponized buzzword
>>8660529
No one actually cares what you think is valid or invalid.
Go watch your cartoons.
>>8660529
>straight trans women
>personalities
>>8660529
>Global Rules
>13. Do not use avatars or attach signatures to your posts.
though you can technically get away with sigs since email field is gone
>>8660742
sorry
╔═════════════════
:
: .ılı.——Cara——.ılı.
: ▄ █ ▄ █ ▄ ▄ █ ▄ █ ▄ █
:
:
:
╚═════════════════
Literally fuck off and die, you annoying cunt.
>>8660539
maybe if you're only talking about """"""""""""""""homophobia""""""""""""""""" against trans-molesbians
>>8660742
>being an unironic rulecuck
>>8662052
>allowing shitposters to shitpost instead of forcing them to use up all their phone service provider's IP range
Why haven't you offed yourself yet?
>>8662067
>being a phonecuck on top of being a rulecuck