I'm sick of having to decipher people. I don't care that you're a ContraStirnerist Anchorite Soy-Accelerationist. From now on specify all political positions in terms of who you want to kill. I don't want to have to wade through an ocean of fucking bullshit memes and references just to figure out whether you need me to die or not.
>but I don't want to kill anyone
If people won't do what you want, you'll have to kill them. If you won't, you're an anarchist and I'm not spending any more time on categorizing you.
>>8637269
>If people won't do what you want, you'll have to kill them. If you won't, you're an anarchist
boy, (You) sure do have a nuanced view on politics
>>8637302
Murder is the only relevant political act. Everything else is merely a lead-up to it. I don't have the time for anything but the absolute bone-bare outline of WHO GETS KILLED WHY.
>>8637441
How's high school treating you?
>>8637441
holy smokes, i'd kill you, what does that make me though?
>>8637482
An asshole who passive-aggressively demands that I figure out what the fuck the Hindi quote in his bio means while he belts out edgelord hot takes that make me nervous and changes his opinions more often than his underwear.
I don't know why that other guy is calling this immature. Identifying friend-or-foe is the most basic shit for anything that's alive. There's an untapped efficiency in just streamlining the fuck out of it. No more reading some pleb's content and then realizing a day later that you're fundamentally incompatible. No more squandering brain cycles on useless dead ends.
>>8637543
disagreeing with someone on political matters doesnt make them your "foe" though
neither is there any reason to want someone like that dead
in fact no one does
are we a society of anarchists
>>8637809
Eventually, most political programs require people to be murdered in order to function. Just because it's in the future doesn't make it any less lethal.