Transwomen Are Ruining The LGBT Community

>>8636920
what are you?

>>8636920
It's almost as if they are..mentally ill?

Aren't men always boasting about furthering science, military and pretty much every area of knowledge more than women? Well, men are now exploring how far gender identity can go! Pushing boundaries!

>>8636935
> Most bitchy about pronouns
Really? Out of 10 "they/them" and fyrs and shirs I find out there, 9 are women.
Maybe men are more prone to enforcing correct pronouns, but they are not the ones keeping the ecosystem alive.

When is she going to show us her new qt face?

File: Little-girl-with-cucumber.jpg (833KB, 2946x4419px) Image search: [Google]

833KB, 2946x4419px

>>8636920
>The LGBT Community

This isn't actually a real thing, so it can't be ruined.
If you don't get along with transwomen then don't hang out with them.
It's not like there are that many of them.

>>8636935
You people would label me "cis" and a "terf", but I'm not really worried about what narcissistic control freaks care to label me.

>>8637328
So you do admit trans women are men? Also lol on the pronoun thing. Trans women are the worst at this. You can't even prefix a sentence with "dude" without them flipping their fucking shit.

>>8637366
I live in a very socially liberal city where I have to deal with them coming into my work and starting shit. They have also physically, sexually and emotionally abused people in my life. This is a pattern amongst trans "women". So yeah, I really don't care to hang out with them.

>>8637389
>I have to deal with them coming into my work and starting shit.

Do you work at McDonalds?

>>8637403
Nope gay bar actually. But now that you mention it, they do seem to be the ones always starting shit at McDonalds lol

>>8636920
Ok here is the mind blowing truth:

Transwomen ARE MEN after all. And most men are narcisstic, lying pieces of shit. Of course they are ruining your shit.

t. a man

>>8637418
Thank you

>>8636920
The vocal MtFs who take part in LGBT "activism" are pretty shitty people. They alienate me a hella lot even though I'm supposed to relate to some of them.

i'd honestly prefer being friends with an Transboy rather than be with another Transgirl

>>8637389
>So you do admit trans women are men?
What? I don't "admit" anything, I 100% think people are either men or women from birth, anything else is just irrelevant terminology.

And the rest of what you said is pretty much aligned with I just said, women are more numerous in the "pick your pronoun" train, but men are the ones flipping out about it the most.
Unless writing passive-aggressive Tumblr vents counts as flipping out, then women might have a chance to compete.

>>8637366
Its not hanging around them for me. Its being politically attached to them I disliked they really are a poison pill. Trying to get any where with them attached to you is super hard because they are to much.

They want to alter everything about everyone else's reality and it can be stifling and exhausting.

Not to mention they have made gay and trans synonymous. Its so bad when ever anything opposing trans comes up people yell out 'thats homophobic' but never use the term 'transophobic'.

Its as if trans people don't respect that they are having identity issues and not sexuality issues.

This in top of the fact that many of them identify as hetrosexuals. Why the hell would I ever need to stand up for a Hetro!

File: gingers.have.souls.gif (2MB, 500x291px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 500x291px

>>8637593
>people are either men or women from birth, anything else is just irrelevant terminology.

yeah, and there are only blondes or brunettes.
gingers don't have souls!

>>8636920
just be glad you aren't lumped together with them, op
> dying inside

>>8637776
I know you think you've got an argument there, but no, people either have lots of melanin on their hair or they don't.
A lot of black-haired people are "ginger", but since their black melanin is so high it doesn't show.

They seriously do ruin the trans name. I'm a transmale the only pronounds I correct is when my family does it and that's because they do it on purpose in front of new people. Their activism is harmful. Also I'm tired of everyone assuming anything trans is transfemale. (sadly I guess it follows in line with me being unable to get along with a large portion of females.)

>>8636920
Trannies are cool with me.
Just not the AGPs who I don't consider anything but perverted straight men.

>>8637806
>not knowing that there are 3 types of melanin

nigga, please try harder

>>8638255
The problem is, you can't really tell the difference since AGPs claim to be transgender outside of 4chan. There's multiple layers of deception, since they're pretending to be transwomen when they're really heterosexual men.

>another /pol/ thread

File: 13561555_1628402097488181_1168183812_n.jpg (173KB, 1080x1080px) Image search: [Google]

173KB, 1080x1080px

>>Trend of online transwomen being pedophiles
Just saying the reason for this, which is the reason why transsexualism is really a fucking joke in general, is because us pedophiles identify more as the female gender due to feminine stereotypes.
We aren't like men and are way more like women, we like kids, we're good with them, we care about them, we aren't super-sexual, we aren't lustful and dick-obsessed, etc.
Personally I identify more as a girl than a man, but I don't do anything about it is all.

I'm not being rude either, some people are genuinely dysphoric, but the vast majority (especially m->f) are not truly so, but rather conditions to be as such due to heavy gender stereotypes and norms.

Think, if all you wanted to do was be a parent and raise a little girl, and your whole gender is supposed to dislike children and prefer sports and stupid garbage of the sort, but instead you prefer simply playing silly games with kids, even as a very young teenager, what do you feel like? You feel much more like a girl/woman than a boy/man.
Plus we generally always preferred girl-things as kids ourselves. I always was more of a girl in terms of capabilities and friendships.

This same phenomenon is present in the radical left, where many times the general population is M->F while not really many more are F->M
I, and them, aren't really trans in my opinion.

>>8638281
Yeah I don't get it. They don't display a modicum of feminity. Even their hyper sexuality is incredibly masculine

>>8638287
Nice rebuttal. Continue being delusional.

>>8638295
Why do you think there has been so much abuse from trans women to cis women? Cis women find trans women creepy in general; the AGP straight men fetishist weirdos are even worse and have to revert to their masculine aggression.

>>8636920
And people wonder why we go stealth when all of us are being judged based on Riley Dennis and random AGPs

>>8638291
Now I am pedophile.

>>8638312
Go stealth and stay that way.

File: screenshot45.png (11KB, 518x85px) Image search: [Google]

11KB, 518x85px

Even in the geek community, CIS genders who run conventions are the major problem.

>>8638332
???
The same applies to pedos and asexuals in my opinion too though.
I still can't say which one I really am, but identify as the former simply because I'm hyper-emotional towards little girls, which can net some sexual feelings if I am not emotionally satisfied, however they're not lustful or sexual-based, as well as they go away if I have time with kids, so I'd argue I'm asexual for all intensive purposes at least.

I was put in that box before I even turned thirteen, maybe because that's just who I am, or maybe it's partially who they created me to be. Odds are if I was given what I wanted, which was a daughter-figure in my life, I'd have simply never even thought sexually of them and rather simply identified as an asexual who wants to be a parent.

>>8638368
Congratulations!
Your IP has been added to an FBI watchlist!

>>8638291
>>8638332
>>8638368
You're all horrible human beings. Children do not have the ability to consent. Thinking about them sexually is disgusting and you should be ashamed for even pontificating on this garbage.

>>8638346
Reading this guys whole tweet, he is just a horrible human being

File: a05c6265debee031d5a4d268ec587a5253a9515c8cd207da6d29153a5d5e4a78.jpg (166KB, 1663x1247px) Image search: [Google]

166KB, 1663x1247px

>>8638379
lol m8 search my username
I really don't care

>>8638390
Sigh, can't you just keep your bullshit to yourself?
Thinking about different sexual things is always disgusting, just as a regular straight person thinking of two guys having sex.
Get over it, bigot.

In regards to consent, it's a ridiculous thing to say they cannot, as if they cannot to sex they cannot to most things, and if that's the case their consent either (A) doesn't matter or (B) while it doesn't count it should be treated as such.
I'm sorry society is sick and cannot make up it's mind, but you can't either, and your position is irrational.

The only horrible person here is you.
I contributed and stayed on topic, and gave my perspective from my position that I did not choose. Then you come in and act vile and start harassing me, completely off-topic, simply because I was born liking little girls.
Piss off.

>>8638409
Nothing he said is incorrect.

>>8638416
> bigot
Being against pedophilia is bigotry now. Fucking kill yourself.

File: 1484040922226.jpg (874KB, 1200x1421px) Image search: [Google]

874KB, 1200x1421px

>>8638291
I always thought gays/trans were more related to pedophilia because, as "not-straight", they had a broader sexual spectrum. And such broadness ended up leading to liking all sorts of sexual stimuli, such as animals, objects and children.
I mean, I'm pretty sure pansexuals are within the LGBT scope, so it's only expected that a group with a less strict sexuality would end up having more people with illegal preferences.

>>8638748
That's the issue though, pedos are the opposite of that.
Pedos are the most "vanilla" of any group. Hetereosexuals have far more deviancies, fetishes, and weird (and really fucked up) desires. We don't.

While gays/trans may seem more deviant to an outsider, if you are an outsider to BOTH groups (like me) you can easily see how they're both extremely deviant.
Gay people (and trans) are just more honest and open about it. Normal people are waaaay more abusive and sick imo in general.

True pedophiles or gays or trans don't really find dogs, kids, objects, etc, attractive, nor do "pansexuals."
Those are just degenerates. They almost always start as hetereosexuals (likely because they're the majority) and then slowly just deviate into other things, going into traps to gay porn to beastiality to kids to rape to torture to necro, to gore, the whole deal.
They aren't genuinely gay, or pansexual, or pedos, as they do not actually experience a genuine attraction (nor an emotional one) but rather they're all just a collection of fetishes.

>>8638960
That doesn't make sense.
So if I rape a baby I can just tell the officer "lol I'm not a pedophile, it wasn't GENUINE attraction! :^)"?

>>8636920
Fuck Riley. That cunt needs to stop "representing us". Your SJW bullshit is not helping our cause.

I'm a closeted transwoman BTW

>>8638992
It probably wasn't.
Statistically only 84-98% of child molesters are pedophiles (or are attracted/aroused whatsoever by kids).
The pedos usually also have an average of 1-3 "victims" while the non-pedos have an average of 7-13.
Statistically speaking a non-pedo is more likely to molest per capita than a pedophile :^)

But LEGALLY that doesn't matter, and normal people have no fucking clue what a pedophile really is, which is why you have idiots like >>8638432 exist.
It's basically the whole thing that happened to gays fifty years ago that happens to us today, all the same lies that we're kidnapping kids, making more of ourselves by spreading it like a disease, raping non-consenting people, etc.

>>8639030
>Statistically speaking
Opps I meant if a child is molested statistically...
To molest, that's debatable, but is not significant either way, however the level of abuse is far lower amongst pedo "abusers."

>>8638960
>>8638416
You are literally defending child rape by saying pedophilia is "vanilla" and consent doesn't matter. You are the degenerate. People like you are the reason so many children get molested and grow up with psychological, emotional and sexual torment.

You are a sick, evil, predatory, piece of trash who is trying to normalize disgusting, destructive behavior under the guise of "sexual orientation".

I miss the days where it was acceptable to just put a bullet in the head of freaks like you.

>>8639030
> using statistics to defend child rape
Sorry, nope

>>8639050
>consent doesn't matter.
No, that's what you said by saying they cannot consent, as the logical conclusion to that is that their consent is irrelevant in general, which then would apply to sex as well.

I say kids can consent and their consent does matter, in everything, always.
It's vanilla because we simply want to be close, bond, and pleasure our partner/love, and in the simple basic ways. No weird fetishes, no disgusting savage behavior, no dense lust, no control. Just vanilla loving sex.

>I miss the days where it was acceptable to just put a bullet in the head of freaks like you.
This was unthinkable till the last century, before then nobody cared. Generally no age of consent was in place, and age of consent never was for consenting sex, and parents didn't mind courting or even mild sexual interactions.
Sorry you know nothing about history :)

>>8639062
>Have no argument
>say irrelevant vile garbage and hatred
Shoo shoo idiot

>>8639062
>defend
He's just pointing things how they are (gays and trans were no different from pedos a few decades ago), not defending it.

I agree to some extent, pedophiles are as ""normal"" as any other sexual orientation (or whatever is the right name for that), it's just their preferences cause more problems for society than what's currently legal, that's why it's outlawed. Doesn't mean every child would be abused, but there's an arbitrary age set to it so some kind of law can be established.

At the end of the day, that's a matter of how low you set the bar - I for one would ban pretty much any kind of non-vanilla sexual deviation. But as things are, there is a lot of weird sexual places humanity goes without questioning itself. For instance, I consider cuckoldry a bigger threat to social cohesion than pedophilia, and it's looked at as just a memegenre of porn.

>>8639079
Young children do not have understanding of the short term and long term implications of sex and do not have all of the knowledge to make informed decisions on sexual acts. Adults can easily manipulate or trick them into giving "consent" because they haven't had the level of socialization as adults have had.

That is why they cannot consent, you fucking retard. I've also reported you to the FBI. Enjoy jail, faggot.

>Doesn't care about the problems of anyone else or any other community, will drive friends and family crazy by attacking them for being cis and not understanding the "struggles of dysphoria"

I really hate this. one of my good friends is trans and all she does is attack me. i should just give up - it's an emotionally abusive relationship.

god forbid she would ever consider that I might have a problem too.

File: 3674449.png (48KB, 219x219px) Image search: [Google]

48KB, 219x219px

>>8639087
>it's just their preferences cause more problems for society than what's currently legal, that's why it's outlawed.
Lol that's not true though, not only because of the statistics I mentioned but because thirty years ago child pornography was legal and there were almost no cases of people being damaged after sex as a child, and cases were far rarer.

>to it so some kind of law can be established.
You don't need to have arbitrary bullshit like age when cases of non-consensual rape and/or dangerous acts are already illegal.
The only thing that gets restricted anymore is consensual acts, which obviously will only hurt more people, especially children.

>>8639106
>to make informed decisions on sexual acts
>to make informed decisions
Notice how that works?
As I said, by default, to it's logical conclusion, as sex isn't anything particularly hard to understand or requiring previous education, their consent doesn't matter to you, as it's violated day in day out every time a child does something, such as sports.

>Adults can easily manipulate or trick
Abuse is abuse and is easy to have in any group/relationship if the intentions are bad from one party or the other.
That's rape or abuse though, so how is it relevant? Abusive relationships are bad, duh, but not all relationships are abusive.

>>8639134
>Notice how that works?
>As I said, by default, to it's logical conclusion, as sex isn't anything particularly hard to understand or requiring previous education, their consent doesn't matter to you, as it's violated day in day out every time a child does something, such as sports.
Dude, what the fuck are you even arguing. Sex with children is NOT NORMAL. What don't you understand about this?

>>8639134
The "arbitrary bullshit" is based on a consensual inference. "At age 1x, most people are (or should be) able to give consent". It's an attempt to give a one-size-fits-all solution, because the law can't work going after a case-by-case approach. Unless another method is found to change how this is assessed, it is a valid approach.

Another factor is giving parents control of their children. If no laws existed, one could simply rape kids left and right and the parents wouldn't be able to do anything, whereas having laws make it so the family doesn't have to resort to violence/revenge killing.

Don't misunderstand me, I've been more mature than your average adult since I was 12 yo or so, could probably have consented to sex at 8 with no negative repercussions, but I understand where the law comes from.
Instead of just advocating against it, you should be looking into other objective solutions. Or not-so-objective ones, screaming and colluding worked for the LGBT. :^)

TERFS GET OUT REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

>>8639160
I've made it very simple and clear already.
If a child cannot consent to sex, they cannot consent to much of their lives, which means their consent doesn't matter (in this society).
If a child can consent, then their consent does matter, and if they choose to consent to sex that's their choice.

I'm not saying it's normal.

>>8639161
>The "arbitrary bullshit" is based on a consensual inference.
It's not though. Nobody had a big fuss about pedophiles whatsoever till the 1990s when the corporate media started publishing bullshit saying pedophiles raped and killed (X) child every fucking week.
Which wasn't true.
All these laws were decided by the elite a long time before anybody in society cared or supported it, and then society was conditioned to it. That's why in the 1800s people didn't care about the AoC still as THE HAND didn't get to them yet. Few generations later (now a single generation thanks to tech) and the hand consumes all.

>Another factor is giving parents control of their children.
Horrible idea
#ChildLiberationGang

>If no laws existed
Did you even read my post?

>Or not-so-objective ones, screaming and colluding worked for the LGBT. :^)
I literally provided one: Abolish it and use rape/abuse laws.
It's literally that fucking easy.
It worked for all of history.

>>8639189
The fact a law didn't exist before or that it was pushed by some sort of agenda doesn't mean it is illogical.
See, honor killings were a pretty normal thing back in the day, nowadays they are outlawed. It is a kind of law I agreed with (traitors should be necked), but I can completely understand and see why people think it is not an appropriate law.

Parents having no control over their children is way worse, you sound like that would be great because yay kiddy sex, but truth is the same elite people who pushed the anti-pedo laws would be the ones owning these liberated children's mind and bending them however they please.

In a traditional family setup, like it used to be the case, you have "pedo" couples (like everyone's grandma/grandpa), but with everything supervised by the family, so there a degree of protection to the little ones even though they are being put into a relationship with a grownup.

>>8637357
Ikr

>>8639222
>Parents having no control over their children is way worse
>but truth is the same elite people who pushed the anti-pedo laws would be the ones owning these liberated children's mind and bending them however they please.
lol no
Currently adults force their believes and indoctrinate their kids, and rather than their kids being able to choose what they want and change their life they're forced to suck down propaganda and abuse from their parents, which most parents (In America) do.

Parents should have no control over their children. The child should choose their caregiver and advocate and be able to switch it anytime they want (and are in a sane mind).

>so there a degree of protection
The issue is because THE HAND has already got the parents, they will only abuse their children and disallow such relationships because they're delusional. Cutting out the middleman and letting the child decide is far better.
The child isn't going to choose to be raped.

>doesn't mean it is illogical.
Yes but what I already explained does make it illogical and stupid.
Abuse is already covered, so the law ONLY makes it so consensual good relationships will be made to be abusive and lives destroyed.

>>8639189
> I've made it very simple and clear already.
> If a child cannot consent to sex, they cannot consent to much of their lives, which means their consent doesn't matter (in this society).
> If a child can consent, then their consent does matter, and if they choose to consent to sex that's their choice.
Except decision making isn't black or white like that. It's almost as if a child doesn't have a fully developed frontal lobe, pituitary gland or other important parts of the brain that are involved in making these sorts of long lasting decisions (sex very often affects the child's sexual development which permanently affects the adult later in life).

But see, you don't care about that. You're a selfish piece of shit who just wants to fuck kids. That's all you care about. You don't care about the long lasting effects of convincing children to give into your dark, twisted perversions. You don't care about children who grow up to become depressed and even suicidal due to being molested as a kid. You don't give a fuck. All you care about is getting your rocks off.

You are an evil person. Truly sick in the head.

>>8639242
> Parents are oppressors and should have no control, they should just give their kids to sexual predators. I'm a nice pedo, trust me!
I really hope you never come close to any children.

>>8639242
>Cutting out the middleman and letting the child decide is far better.
Okay, you lost me here. Adults are nothing more than big children, but they will statistically take less bad decisions in their lives. You were the statistic guys to point out pedos aren't as dangerous as regulars, so don't give me that crap.

Your system is perfectly fine - in an utopic society. Just like the current system.

>>8636920
The main problem is that everyone is allowed to call themselves trans today. 90% of trans people aren't really trans.
They have other mental problems and brainwashed themselves into thinking they have another gender. Then they "transition" (or not) but it doesn't fix anything because their problem isn't being trans but something else.

>>8639538
Most of 'em are either Transbian fucks or Tumblr girls that try to be "cute prettie uwu yaoi bois".

>>8639538
Tumblr calls them "transtrenders", and that's very fitting. I believe our generation will have a HUGE gap within a feel decades because all these people falling for le gender maymay will kill themselves or die prematurely.

>>8638419
Not the Anon you were replying to but the way he worded his tweet was very antagonizing if not, slightly weaponized.

File: 1499742782597.jpg (8KB, 173x214px) Image search: [Google]

8KB, 173x214px

this only applies to hons

>>8637418
cuck

>>8636920
You shouldn't cause we don't give a flying fuck about you so fuck off you whiny slut and go back to being a basic boring bitch.

>I don't understand why nature made boring cunts like poofs and dykes?

>>8637389
>They have also physically, sexually and emotionally abused people in my life.

Faggots and dykes are like the youngest child of the family, they cause the most trouble and yet get away with it by passing the blame onto someone else.

>Trend of online transwomen being pedophiles
There's actually a big overlap between anti-tranny and pro-pedo people and groups.
A lot of the worst anti-tranny spammers on this board are self-admitted pedophiles like kek the racist mexican lesbian who hits their mom and used to spam cp in lesgen, or that gay guy who admitted to being underage and morbidly obese though they later tried to change their story and say they were only slightly overweight, or more recently that spammer who would make multiple bait threads at once with that gay guy dressed as a nun for the op image who pulled out the classic "pedos deserve acceptance more but trannies are stealing it" bullshit.
It's not just shitposter online either, mchugh the disgraced doctor and medical starlet of the anti-trans movement advocates for pedos not being held legally responsible for raping kids and has pushed for harassing sexually explicit phonecalls to victims to be inadmissible as evidence.

How long until Riley give a face reveal, damn it?

>>8645515
Pedophiles get triggered at their utter lack of acceptance anywhere and spread FUD wherever they go as a result of their own bumsore and self-hatred.

They try so desperately to force their pedosexual crap when no one's buying it. No one will ever buy it. Nobody is ever going to sign off their kids to you, no matter how hard you force it's JUST CONSENTING ACTS.

>>8638368
>intensive purposes

File: IMG_3429.jpg (46KB, 500x375px) Image search: [Google]

46KB, 500x375px

Reminder than trans"men" are the ones who keep getting away with not putting any effort to not look feminine while wearing full on eyeliner and lipstick

>>8647734
also dfabs objectively have it way easier, no amount of hrt can grow our hips or shrink our shoulders or chins and cross dressing men are the second biggest LGBT laughing stocks next to cis gay men

>>8636920
Terfs spew hatred and don't help anyone but themselves.

Prove me wrong

File: kim-kanye.gif (1010KB, 366x224px) Image search: [Google]

1010KB, 366x224px

>>8636920
This pretty much only applies to triggered SJWs. That's why we need to be more compassionate and develop a better understanding of what causes gender identity issues. Stop pushing trans people into living the life you describe.

> Talks over ciswomen, invading their spaces and oftentimes sexually and emotionally abusing them
See, they're not all bad!

File: 1402844706426.png (1MB, 4655x4153px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 4655x4153px

>>8636920
>Tell me why I should respect transwomen again?
You shouldn't.

>>8647756
>being involved in a women's rights movement as a woman from the start is exactly the same as invading one as an entitled 30-year old man in a skirt
Your feefees will heal someday, maybe go for a walk instead?