genders

Isn't that, like, common knowledge??? i thought this was a already addressed

cheese 'n rice

>>8619536
gender expression is, by the notion that someone can be "more feminine" or "more masculine" than someone else

if you mean sex, ofc it isn't

>>8619536
Don't worry, there will be more and more ways to smash it up. If you think you can defend gender now, just wait until new perversions will come around.

When that happens, lots of cool stuff can be expected, like toy dogs getting taken out, I can't even tell what's worse, such a pathetic sycophantic abomination of a creature, or the grotesque mindless "people" who actually need the affirmation of such a walking joke. The whole frivolity of 'murica will be chiped away at from any angle, and the freaks can block off the most obvious angles of defence against them, but they'll always be targets, the sickening people will pay directly of indrectly.

>>8619558
this, there's only like 6 to 10 sexes.

>>8619536
I disagree. There is a gender spectrum. However distribution is an inverted gauss curve.

File: image.jpg (62KB, 570x450px) Image search: [Google]

62KB, 570x450px

>>8619536
You're right, it's more of an n-dimensional manifold.

>>8619696
LOL

>>8619696
this is every bit as legitimate as any published gendertheory/whatever paper

>>8619696
gender is a fidget spinner

>>8619750
this