What do you call someone who only likes traps, trannies and femboys?

>>8523074
A faggot

>>8523074
A disgusting chaser.

>>8523074
a trans girl

>>8523074
Garbage

>>8523074
GAMP

>>8523078
This.

>>8523074
Gay or more politically correct a faggot

In the closet.

>>8523074
/r9k/

>>8523074
My future bf or maybe gf (male)

>>8523074
A man of fine taste.

>>8523074
an egg

Faggot in denial

me

>>8523074
straight if your male
lesbian if youre female

File: forever_alone_by_foreveraloneplz.png (25KB, 325x306px) Image search: [Google]

25KB, 325x306px

>>8523074
forever alone

porn addict

>>8523074
>tfw that is me and I consider myself bisexual

>>8523074
repressing hardcore

>>8531510
>wanting to fuck something cute and feminine means wanting to become cute and feminine

kys yourself

>>8523586
London.txt

>>8523074
gynandromorphile
>>8523078
>>8523560
it's closer to being straight than gay
gays don't like boobs

>>8531535
gay or not gay isn't really helpful because people use it to mean attracted to anything that's male but also anything that's masculine so in some senses it's gay and in some it's not.

this is gay though, really gay.

>>8523074
If you want them to fuck you then you're gay.
If you want to fuck them then you're straight.

Robin

>>8531544
>gay or not gay isn't really helpful
that's why I used that complicated word (I screwed up spelling it https://en.m.wiktionary.org/wiki/gynandromorphophilia)
being attracted to transwomen doesn't say anything about someones orientation
>this is gay though, really gay.
what??

>>8531640
if you're attracted to a transwomen because they're trans then you're attracted to their body because you're making that distinction between cis and trans women (or you're projecting what you think their personality will be onto them), so you're probably attracted to dicks, and that's gay.

File: qt trans gf pen.jpg (774KB, 1080x1080px) Image search: [Google]

774KB, 1080x1080px

>>8531648
I'm attracted to both cis and transwomen

zero attraction to dicks

if I ever got with a transwoman, I'd only ever fuck her bussy, never touch her dick

this is speculative though, bc I'm a manlet NEET, I never even leave the house and I'm not even attractive enough to get a cis gf, let alone a hot passing trans gf with cute feminine benis

pic related: it's the qt anime trans gf I will never have, never hold and whisper sweet nothings into her ear

hold me /b/ros

s a d b o i s

>>8532519
>zero attraction to dicks
>cute feminine benis
what is it about transwomen that you find attractive in a way that's different from cis women apart from the dick which you seem to have conflicting thoughts on?

>>8532524
>cute feminine benis
>the dick which you seem to have conflicting thoughts on
how new r u?

did I need to explicitly spell it out for you?
did you need that " /s " symbol at the end to detect sarcasm?
am I speaking to a brainlet?

anyhow, I'm attracted to the femininity of transwomen, the more passable they are the harder my benis obviously, the chin, the delicate limbs and thighs (assuming they follow some kind of heavily cardio-based workout regimen to shape their body to be as delicate and feminine as possible).
the sense of me wanting to protect her smile and hold her hand and love her openly no matter what anti-trans bigots say or do, protect her with my physical strength and presence just like I would with any cis woman

the sense of making her feel sexy and appreciated so that she worships my benis and never feels like I love her less for not being cis

basically that desu

>>8532537
(cont)
also, dat feel when I can blow my load in her tight bussy as much as I want (with her consent ofc, that's a given) without ever needing to use a condom because she can't get pregnant

File: 19598933_10207401265388858_3265686326949782114_n.jpg (65KB, 750x924px) Image search: [Google]

65KB, 750x924px

>>8531599
he's 28 in Rebuild 3.33, okay? that means it isn't pedo anymore

>>8532537
(cont)
I forgot to mention small waist obviously

my ideal cute trans gf would be in good shape

good enough shape to take multiple of my hot, fat, gunky, cummy loads exploding deep into her tight little bussy over and over again (I can see myself spending a whole weekend doing that desu, with only bathroom breaks and water/hydration breaks plus home cooked dinner with wine or weed, topping it all off with showering off together when we're done, except I pump my hard benis into her tight little bussy while we're showering also)

fuck I'm very hard now

sucks I only have my right hand doe :(

>>8532537
usually it's chasers who become belligerent immediately after somebody points out how they've been talking about transwomen's genitals, why are you doing it?

what past of cute feminine benis was meant to be sarcasm because that doesn't seem to scan right, was the whole part sarcasm? like actually it would be easy to get a 'a hot passing trans gf with cute feminine benis'?


>I'm attracted to the femininity of transwomen
>just like I would with any cis woman
yes but I'm asking why single out transwomen specifically, just so you can feel good about protecting them from anti-trans bigots? not trying to find a gotcha here just curious

>the sense of making her feel sexy and appreciated so that she worships my benis and never feels like I love her less for not being cis
starting to sound a little like a twisted saviour/charity complex going on there, offering pity to somebody like that seems kinda weird

>when I can blow my load in her tight bussy as much as I want
now that's creepy
>without ever needing to use a condom because she can't get pregnant
what are STIs? and who says they'll let you? and can't you screw cis women in the behind? seems kind of exploitative to expect lots of anal sex from somebody because they can't do it many other ways. is your idea of transwoman that they're basically all nymphomaniacs?

>>8532551
that's a little TMI but I'm not really seeing why that's specific to cis women, I get the feeling you think trans women will be more receptive or submissive or something?

>>8532560
*why that's specific to trans woman

>>8532556
>chasers who become belligerent immediately
m8, chill.
I wasn't being belligerent. I take it you've never been out partying with friends and taken some light teasing/ribbing/roasting? I wasn't trying to seriously insult you when I called you a brainlet, it was just some mild joshing m8. Lighten up. Srs. sorry if I came off as aggressive, not my intention at all. we /friendly/

the sarcasm part was the "cute feminine benis" part. bc that's a meme phrase that I've seen over and over again on the chans, I thought you would recognize it.

>actually it would be easy to get a hot passing trans gf?
Nooo. Quite the opposite. Especially considering I made explicitly clear that I'm a manlet (sub 6 foot) NEET who never leaves the house (in simpler terms: I'm not an attractive man.

you brought up a lot of points, so I will (cont), hold up a bit

>>8532569
>teasing/ribbing/roasting
I'm not one of the lads no sorry

>recognize it
I did which is why I questioned why you'd use it because the usage tends to imply an affection for what it describes, but I see you were just dropping that fire meme in there

>manlet (sub 6 foot) NEET who never leaves the house
>not an attractive man
who cares? are you a nice person and not a chaser? that's like 90% of the equation

>>8532556
(cont)
>why single out transwomen specifically?
I am attracted to both cis and transwomen. How does that equal singling out trans women? And yeah I would feel good about protecting my (hypothetical, probably never going to happen, I'll probably die a virgin, get me off this ride Mr. Bones) cute trans gf from bigots and muggers and other aggressors. Not just for the fuck of it, but because I would feel obliged to. As the man in the relationship, I would feel a moral obligation and honor and duty to make her always feel safe and warm and loved and protected and cherished like the sweetest spring flower when she's by my side.

>starting to sound a little like a twisted saviour/charity complex
maybe it is? maybe it's a problem? I'm not even sure desu. I simply don't understand why it would be a problem to feel such a strong compulsion on my part to do everything in my power to make her feel protected. Is that not a healthy, pro-social behavior? A behavior of dignity and devotion to your partner and following the righteous/noble path?

>now that's creepy
why? isn't sex and enjoyment of sex a healthy part of most relationships? (keyword most, I have nothing against asexuals and I wish them the best)
>what are STIs?
if we're both committed then we're only fucking each other? and if she did have an STI from a previous relationship or fling before me, if she turned out to be what people call "the one" then frankly I wouldn't care.
>who says they'll let you?
re-read my post >>8532541
in brackets I clearly stated that all this is within the parameters/boundaries of her consent, aka no crossing of her boundaries.
>can't you screw cis women in the behind?
I could, but with a cis woman I would prefer P in V simply because from what I know it's less of a hassle since the vagina doesn't need to be as perfectly clean as the anal and you don't need lube like you do with anal.

not done, will (cont)

>>8532556
(cont)
>seems kind of exploitative to expect lots of anal sex from somebody...
I would not ever impose my will on my (hypothetical trans) gf. That's fucked and completely immoral, obviously. Everything is within the bounds of her consent. Her consent and her pleasure would always be at the top of my priority. I guess what I had trouble conveying was basically this: I would want to have sex with her as much as she would allow me to and have the time/energy for.
>is your idea of transwoman that they're basically all nymphomaniacs?
no, you got it switched up. my idea of myself is that I am the male equivalent of a nymphomaniac because I know that I'm horny very, very often.
>you think trans women will be more receptive or submissive or something?
I don't have this notion that all transwomen are receptive and submissive. I'm simply saying that my (keyword: my) ideal cute trans gf would be delicate, receptive and submissive in her personality.

File: spurdo benzies.jpg (63KB, 800x680px) Image search: [Google]

63KB, 800x680px

>>8532583
>who cares? are you a nice person and not a chaser? that's like 90% of the equation
>90% of the equation
>90%
I fucking wish it was that simple for an unattractive, short, shitposting NEET like me to get a cute trans gf.
I fucking wish.
fuck.
who /jaded/ here?

>>8532641
you're not jaded, you are just a loser.

>>8532605
>How does that equal singling out trans women?
well maybe you're not then

>Is that not a healthy, pro-social behavior?
not really, when you start to treat your partner more like a child that's a bit odd.

>why?
well it's creepy for two reasons, it's creepy because you're saying something that's majorly upsetting for transwomen is a pro point to you (no female genitals), and it's creepy because you're sounding like you think transwomen are fuckdolls to be used like objects.

would you say it'd be great to have a cis gf because you'd get to bang her whenever you want? probably not right?

>if we're both committed then we're only fucking each other
I mean still kind of gross but ok
>parameters/boundaries of her consent
I think you might be setting yourself up for disappointment if you're assuming you're going to be able to cum in them every day is all I'm saying, it's a lot of effort for people to get ready and it's effort to clean up the mess you'll make up there.

>I know it's less of a hassle
surely that's a positive for cis women then and a negative for transwomen?

>>8532626
>my ideal cute trans gf would be delicate, receptive and submissive in her personality
and would the same be said of your idea cis gf?

>>8532641
>to get a cute trans gf
why specifically mention trans?

>>8532648
fuck. I am a loser. I'm completely pathetic. at this point, I'm not even sure what I'm still doing here. the only reason I haven't offed myself is bc I'm a coward and afraid of becoming nothingness, of being obliterated into the void.

>when you start to treat your partner more like a child
desu I probably went a bit overboard with the flowery language. of course I'd treat her as an independent person and not be clingy and smothering and shit. what I was trying to convey is this: whenever she is with me and we're walking together somewhere I would hope that I can convey enough of a commanding, alpha male presence/aura and vibe to both ward off potential aggressors and keep her feeling secure in my presence. exactly as I would with a cis gf.

>majorly upsetting for transwomen is a pro point to you (no female genitals)
now that I read that exact line, it seems obvious to me now why that's no bueno. I did not know why that would be the case before. Thanks for letting me know, I'll definitely keep that in mind and make sure not to say that from now on.

>like you think transwomen are fuckdolls to be used like objects
>would you say it'd be great to have a cis gf because you'd get to bang her whenever you want? probably not right?
no, I wouldn't. You're right. I don't think transwomen are fuckdolls to be used like objects. Her needs and wants would always come first, which is why I now feel remorse for saying what I said in such a crude, demeaning, disrespectful way that I gave off that impression.

>I think you might be setting yourself up for disappointment
of course, you're right that being able to cum in her every day is probably unrealistic. what I said was more my fantasy than anything, I guess.

>surely that's a positive for cis women and a negative for transwomen?
but if that trans woman is beautiful and "the one" and she gives me butterflies in the stomach and I love her then the extra hassle would mean nothing to me. :3

not done will (cont)

>>8532754
^ this is intended for >>8532651

(cont)
>and would the same be said of your idea cis gf?
yes. although, now that I think about it a bit more: I wouldn't want my hypothetical gf to be completely receptive/submissive/delicate. I'd want her to have enough of a confidence and commanding energy to at least be able to keep me in check when I've fucked up and keep me "honest" in a sense. (for example: getting on my case if I'm not doing my job as a good bf by helping/doing my part of the household chores, not being a good listener etc.)

>why specifically mention trans?
because a cute trans gf would be exponentially harder for me to find than a cute cis gf since there are so much fewer trans women than there are cis women in the world.

>>8532785
*so much more cis women than there are trans women in the world

>>8532754
>commanding, alpha male presence/aura
>ward off potential aggressors
do you really believe this alpha male nonsense?
I guess some people still want the guy to be lord protector but that's w/e

>make sure not to say that from now on
well I don't want to police your language but for me personally when somebody says it's a real positive that they get to have anal all the time it does kind of feel like they're ignoring that it takes a major negative to be there for the other person. kind of like saying it's so great that your gf was hideously burned in an accident because it means you can teach them how to play vidya all day because they can't go outside.

>extra hassle would mean nothing to me
well if you're the one cleaning out their bum alright then :^)

File: angeryboi.png (18KB, 128x128px) Image search: [Google]

18KB, 128x128px

>>8523579
this tbqfh famalino

oreganoli originaloe

File: 1453235971105.gif (346KB, 500x500px) Image search: [Google]

346KB, 500x500px

>>8532846
>do you really believe this alpha male nonsense?
what matters more here is not belief, but practical result.
I'm clearly a beta male (short, NEET vidya-anime-4chan shitposter, the complete opposite of the big /muscles/ frat bro Chad).
As a beta male, no girl (cis or trans) has ever liked me.
All the alpha Chads I've ever known in my life, on the other hand, have never had any problems with getting cute gf's.
So forgive me if I use my own observational skills honed over 24 years of my life experience and decide that I want to emulate what has already been proven to work.

>they're ignoring that it takes a major negative to be there for the other person
I'm not ignoring that negative. Clearly it's a problem. But I can't cure all of their dysphoria, even if I tried. I'm simply not qualified/do not have the skills/expertise to do so. So perhaps I was a bit simplistic in my thinking of "make the best of what you have/find the positives in the shit situations". How do you suggest I do better in this aspect?

>well if you're the one cleaning out their bum alright then :^)
I'd happily clean out her bum if I loved her enough to want to be with her in a committed relationship.

>>8532912
>I'm clearly a beta male (short, NEET vidya-anime-4chan shitposter, the complete opposite of the big /muscles/ frat bro Chad).
the only people that care about this are r9k and the alpha/beta thing is debunked it's pseudo science, and frat bros are gross that's why everybody hates them. I think you're being too hard on yourself, you don't have to beat yourself up for being short or neet, loneliness and not meeting people is a massive problem for our generation right now, I'm sure there are women out there who'd like you for you, the trouble is we're all stuck indoors.

>emulate what has already been proven to work
you're going to change your height and personality? you have to be you in life or what's the point.

>How do you suggest I do better in this aspect?
just being mindful of how other people feel and talking to them about it which I'm sure you'd do you seem like a nice person.

>>8532945
>alpha/beta thing is debunked it's pseudo science
proofs if tru? I'm not a dogmatist so I try to always update my views based on logic/rationality and evidence.

>I'm sure there are women out there who'd like you for you
Has not happened yet, not for lack of trying. So I sure hope so.

>you have to be you in life or what's the point.
tru

>you seem like a nice person
thanks. I sure hope people feel that way about me IRL.

>>8533013
the guy that wrote the book the alpha/beta thing came from debunked it themselves, alpha wolves are usually just the parents of the pack.

http://knowledgenuts.com/2014/01/11/the-alpha-wolfe-is-an-outdated-myth/
https://content.time.com/time/health/article/0,8599,2007250,00.html
http://www.davemech.org/news.html

there's no evidence anywhere that it applies to humans, probably why r9k and pol can never settle on how many different categories there are, as it turns out we're all individuals.

File: bench city outskirts.jpg (792KB, 1261x891px) Image search: [Google]

792KB, 1261x891px

>>8532945
>I think you're being too hard on yourself
wew. shit just got real personal.
I guess that might be a problem, huh? The fact that I've never felt like I ever deserved to be loved.

oh boy.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WlEKiy_NkYM

>>8533031
https://youtu.be/r52agZeuU8c