Would Gay people exist/have legal marriage rights if women couldn't vote? I think not.
:thinking:
>>8401969
Dumb phone poster.
>>8401969
>Would Gay people exist/have legal marriage rights if women couldn't vote? I think not.
Job Cohen is a man.
And a jew but that wasn't part of the question.
>>8401969
>aware that women voting is the problem
>still rallies against gays
hetcuck please
No, because minorities tend to be more tolerant of each other. Not 100% of course, since minorities are still human and therefore xenophobic and stupid. And religious minorities tend to hate sexual minorities, so there are exceptions. But women tend to be more inclusive of others, and more progressive.
Did gay rights exist before women could vote? No.
So there's your answer.
>>8402263
>But women tend to be more inclusive of others, and more progressive.
Where are the FTM-exclusionary MRAs?
>>8402263
Also, in b4 'women are not a minority'.
Sure, they're 50% of the world population, so they should have 50% of the power. But they don't, do they? So they're a suppressed group, which is what people generally mean when they say 'minority'.
>>8402284
>But they don't, do they?
No, they have far more.
>>8402284
>But they don't, do they?
[citation needed]
>>8402263
>Did gay rights exist before women could vote? No.
Actually that depends on what constitutes as a "gay right".
After all the decriminalisation of homosexual acts can be argued to be a gay right.
>>8401969
>Ancient Romans, Greeks, and Mesopotamians had same sex unions. >All were predominantly run by men.
You thought wrong.
>>8402284
>Minority, A relatively small group of people.
Women are not minorities, anyone who uses the term in this way are retarded.
>So they're a suppressed group
>Suppressed, prevent the development, action, or expression of
In Third World shitholes, yes. But in the first world, they're women CEO's, Defense Ministers, World Leaders, Judges, Activists, etc.
Honestly though, I hate gays. and women.