Why is there so much heterosexual media (entertainment, news)?

Because heterosexuals are the majority like it or not

>>8357327
But there are plenty of other kinds of minorities in media

>>8357323
Why is the cute guy all blurry and the dumb bitch in focus?

>>8357338
there are plenty of homos in media too.

Because we run this shit fucking faggot.

>>8357323
>giraffe neck

>>8357323
then there's the occasional "gay" music dance track on a local terrestrial radio station.

>>8357323
Gay people are 3% of the population. If you look at the fact that every show has gay people at a ratio higher than that, were actually over represented.

We're a tiny minority. Get over it.

>>8358074
Thanks for clearing that up, I almost thought it was an extra terrestrial radio station.

>>8358352
>3% meme

Come on.

>>8358369
What do you choose to believe? The 10% meme that was from literally the first real attempt on predicting it?

Just because it "feels" like there are more doesn't mean there are.

>>8358401
>What do you choose to believe?
Reality, which has a straight bias. A lot of people aren't truthful in real life and struggle with their sexuality, you should know it. Even if you want to gay by stat 14% experience same sex attraction at one point.

>>8358405
>14%
Oh I'm laffin.

I jerked off to straight porn when I was 12, does that make me straight?

>>8358425
Yeah, because a dude fapping to straight born is the same as dudes fapping to gay porn.

It's not like society tells you should be straight.

>>8358585
Nobody ever told me to gap to straight porn. I just googled porn and was turned on. I was legitimately aroused by the sight it female nudity in my early years of puberty. The idea that someone would be the same way in the opposite direction is not absurd.

What is absurd is proposing many times more the best estimate for gay people for no reason other than a supposed bias in anonymous surveys. Now I would agree there's potential to that, but to make the leap that if said cultural bias were removed we'd have like 4 times more gays is silly.

>>8358594
>What is absurd is proposing many times more the best estimate for gay people for no reason other than a supposed bias in anonymous surveys. Now I would agree there's potential to that, but to make the leap that if said cultural bias were removed we'd have like 4 times more gays is silly.
And yet this is what is happening nowadays, you think we don't have more gay guys compared to the 80?

Because (((they))) want it that way so they can keep the LGBT master race down.

File: white people control the media meme.jpg (278KB, 746x966px) Image search: [Google]

278KB, 746x966px

>>8357397
stfu no we fucking don't, this is just a myth liberal retards say to feel rebellious.

File: 0YNIsHW[1].png (1015KB, 1699x1638px) Image search: [Google]

1015KB, 1699x1638px

>>8357397

>>8362203
honestly this whole conspiracy breaks down when you consider the odds of two jews working together on anything, much less all of them

This is good.

>>8358595
>And yet this is what is happening nowadays
And you have no sources to back this up.

>you think we don't have more gay guys compared to the 80?
I'm sure we do have more open gay men, but not several times more.

The fucking 10% stat came from Kinsey's study in the fucking 1940s, so your logic of a repressive society doesnt really even hold for the research done during even more repressive eras.

>>8362203
Viacom is owned by CBS.

File: 1470765369529.jpg (398KB, 1766x1734px) Image search: [Google]

398KB, 1766x1734px

>>8362246
Less than a dozen billionaires all getting together to collude on how to make the most money and spread their politics? No that's insane that would never happen not in a million years

1) Heterosexual is the vast majority etc.
2) Heterosexual is the source of all mammalian life. And bird/reptile life too and fish life too. All the life that is worth caring about comes from heterosexual. Nothing comes from homosexual except higher STDs and domestic abuse rates.

>>8362861
>their politics
>Implying they all agree

>>8362246
>honestly this whole conspiracy breaks down when you consider

How i wish that was true.

It's a net work of double loyalty, many small secret societies of rich people protecting others, they keep themselves in check by having blackmail on each other. When one gets out of like they kill them or out them.

Here are examples on the blackmailing https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wSPZ5Sw6pQI

And here are examples on how the jews have a special place over the various groups https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DTihERs5s9k

>>8362941
>what is cultural Marxism.

>>8362846

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Viacom
>because Viacom is held by National Amusements, Inc., a privately owned theater company controlled by the billionaire Sumner Redstone. Redstone also holds – via National Amusements – a controlling stake in CBS Corporation.

Who is Summer Readstone?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sumner_Redstone
>Sumner was born to a Jewish family
>his father agreed to change the family surname from "Rothstein" to "Redstone"[3] ("Red stone" is a literal translation of the German-Jewish name, "Rothstein")

yes, yes, i know I'm "linking Wiki", but this is common knowledge, and you're not always going to have the perfect sources in a world were they keep encroaching on freedom of speech.

>>8362958
>>8362974
It must be scary to live in the paranoid /pol/tard's world.

>>8362868
Why do you folks always pretend like homosexual behavior isn't well documented and frequent among animals?

>>8357350
>Why is the cute guy all blurry and the dumb bitch in focus?
He's running faster. Male superiority.

>>8357350
>Why is the cute guy all blurry and the dumb bitch in focus?

Why is the guy hotter and younger than the bitch? Why would a guy like that be with a woman that has already hit the wall?

>>8362991

>Why do you folks always pretend like homosexual behavior isn't well documented and frequent among animals?

What are you talking about?? Like, yeah I know a dog will hump whatever BUT who cares? What does that have to do with what I wrote? Who is """you folks"""?

>>8357323
I`m actually wondering why nowadays we have so much homosexual stuff in the tv considering we are the minority by far.

If we had indian TV shows it would make more sense since they are probably a bigger part of the population lel.

>>8362990
You live in this world as well, you may as well know who is controlling it and where they're taking you so you're not a marking your forehead or hand in submission.

>paranoid
It's not an irrational fear if it's true,

>A relatively mild mental illness that is not caused by organic disease, involving symptoms of stress (depression, anxiety, obsessive behavior, hypochondria)

>but not a radical loss of touch with reality.

neurosis would be the correct diagnosis

>>8362991
>>8363024

Like, when I mentioned animals I said it was the SOURCE OF LIFE. Which it is. Heterosexuality is where most animal life comes from (minus I think starfish or whatever asexual creatures).

Now of course animals hump on whatever, they are animals. Many don't care about gender or even species, and pretty much none care about consent. But the only type of sexual relationship which involves the creation of new life is heterosexual.

>>8363024
Many duck species mate for life. Some of those pair bonded couples are same-sex.

>>8363039
Creating life is only step one. Rearing new life is more important.

And we are a social species. It's there are other ways to benefit the species besides just putting sperm in eggs. A good teacher for instance can be more beneficial to the rearing of children than most people with kids, and definitely more than somebody who got drunk and fucked without a condom.

>>8357327

This.

File: 762760b2886cff631c6c982e7fb6f209.jpg (181KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

181KB, 1920x1080px

>>8357327
Not only this but you must all recognize that no matter how accepted most of you are, you're always a deviation from the norm.

A deviation that those in power are trying to push on everyone who isn't like you, but a deviation none the less.

>>8363040
What does that have to do with anything at all in the whole universe.

Also lol ducks are the biggest rapists wtf. I think you are thinking of geese?

>>8363048
>Creating life is only step one. Rearing new life is more important.
No, rearing new life is not more important than the CREATION of life. Rearing requires creation, not vice versa. First you must create a life, then (depending on species) tend it to an age of independence.

>And we are a social species. It's there are other ways to benefit the species besides just putting sperm in eggs.
Who cares. Did I say "homosexuals can never benefit the species"? Did I say "homosexuals can never be a good teacher"? No. I said heterosexuality is the source of life. Which it is. Why does that scare you so much?

Also make sure to distinguish between homosexuals and homosexuality. Like a gay guy can still engage in hetero sex and create new life.

>>8363094
>Did I say "homosexuals can never benefit the species"?

The first comment in this chain is >>8362868. Is that not you?

And I'm glad that you think jerking off in a cup for drug money is more important than raising a foster child. It shows how myopic. Your worldview is. Reproduction is retard easy. But human infants are literally incapable of supporting themselves, so by your definition of furthering the species, rearing is at least AS important as reproduction. If nobody fertilized eggs, nobody would be alive. But if nobody picked up the infant after birth and took care for it, nobody would be alive either. Both are equally necessary.

>>8363179
Yeah thats me. When I said "homosexual" I meant "homosexual sex" not every individual gay person. Get over yourself. I'm bisexual and I choose to stick with men because that was how I knew I was going to have a family, whereas with other women? I'd get nothing but elevated abuse rates. One is way better than the other. That's life.

>It shows how myopic. Your worldview is.
What is """"""""my worldview"""""""""?

>Reproduction is retard easy.
No humans just make it look easy. The creation of life is amazing and thus far only ever seen on Earth. The more you learn biology and the more you realize how fragile life is, the more amazing it will be.

>rearing is at least AS important as reproduction. If nobody fertilized eggs, nobody would be alive. But if nobody picked up the infant after birth and took care for it, nobody would be alive either. Both are equally necessary.
Sure, yes, as mammals we do need to care for infants (thus why we developed mammary glands to feed them). Other animals don't. It depends. >99% of rearing is done by heterosexual or bisexuals too though (especially women).

>>8363195
>Sure, yes, as mammals we do need to care for infants
Thank you for conceding.

>>8363195
>I chose to love only one group of people because of a statistic that could be avoided by just choosing non-abusive partners

Life isn't roulette. There are other factors than just dumb luck.

>>8363203

>I chose to love only one group of people because of a statistic that could be avoided by just choosing non-abusive partners
Nah because I wanted a family. Didn't you read?

>I choose to stick with men because that was how I knew I was going to have a family

It's PB&J as opposed to P&B.

Never understood the people who just ate straight peanut butter and bread. What a bunch of f r e a k s.