Am I gay if I want to fuck traps? I want to cum inside their

Just follow the roman rule its been followed for over two thousand years. Dominating and fucking someone as a man, no matter who they are, is masculine and straight. Getting fucked or sucking a dick is submissive and gay.

In fact dominating another masculine man is arguable more straight than fucking a women who is much weaker and easy prey. Its natural instinct: lions and alpha wolfs fuck other males into submission all the time and everyone ones animals can't be gay.

And vice versa getting "pegged" or eating pussy is gay as shit in comparison.

>>8276659
I'm going to save this because this is exactly how I feel.

>>8276561

It's not gay if your balls don't touch.

I don't understand.

What the point of fucking a trap if their dick isn't involved? Just get a girl.

>>8276561
Dude that's still gay, your just a dominant gay rather than a submissive one.

If you want to have sex with a man you are gay

>>8276561
To be fair if you also like fucking women you may just be bisexual rather than being a full-blown (badum tshh) gay person.

>>8276659
Topping guys is gay as fuck. You're specifically seeking out guys rather than girls. You're not masculine and "straight" just because you top, get over yourself.

>>8276765
>>8276783

If you want to fuck women or traps (that look like women) you are 110% straight.

>>8276796
In what universe?

File: 73[1].jpg (68KB, 534x762px) Image search: [Google]

68KB, 534x762px

>>8276788

Lol no tell me what is gay:

A: Getting fucked in the ass by pic related "female" wearing a strap on a sucking her test enlarged clit

or

B: Fucking a qt trap in his soft warm hole and getting your dick sucked by him for your own pleasure

Don't lie to yourself.

File: 12224200_956252357754171_129140087_n.jpg (86KB, 1080x767px) Image search: [Google]

86KB, 1080x767px

>>8276765
>man

>>8276659

>Follow the roman rule
>Doing X is straight
>Doing Y is gay

At least say honorable and dishonorable or something, if you're saying this you're admitting the categories of gay and straight didn't exist back then

>>8276659
You should read Foucalt's History of Sexuality if you haven't. It says something similar in a better way

http://www.sparknotes.com/philosophy/histofsex/summary.html

>>8276861
I'm downloading this.

I read something of his the other day about socialism and it piqued my interest.

>>8276815
Probably in both situations there's at least bisexual tendencies.

>>8276911

lmao you are deluded, A is 9000 times gayer than B. No women is perfect, some have masculine features, and traps look more like women than a lot of actual women who you wouldn't say its gay to fuck. Fucking a trap is like 1% gay maybe if you touch the dick and 109% straight. Fucking a weak and naturally submissive women is taking the easy path which is at least 10% gay.

>>8276828
Without those clothes, you're still a guy.

>>8276561
You are not gay. You are androgynemorphophilic.

File: Capture.png (77KB, 1164x597px) Image search: [Google]

77KB, 1164x597px

>>8277022

>>8276983
Being gay has nothing to do with how "easy" or submissive your partner is.
It's not like you have to be completely gay to fuck an mtf or a trap or whatever but at least on some level there's some degree of bisexuality. It's really not a big deal unless you're insecure about yourself.

>>8277035

So if you fuck a woman with any sort of masculine trait, harry vag, abs, you're automatically bisexual? Of course not. Fucking a trap is not gay or bisexual unless you are claiming everyone on earth is bisexual.

>>8277060
You're not bisexual just for having sex with a woman with masculine traits. Maybe if she was a huge powerlifter like above and was fucking you in the ass there's some degree of bisexuality just because they've intentionally worked toward making themselves as masculine as possible.
Traps work towards femininity so it's probably not what people think of with standard homosexuality but it's still a male that worked to make themselves appear more feminine so there's a degree of bisexuality to it.

But yes I believe research has shown most people have some bisexual tendencies, it's just often not enough to warrant people to act upon them so for the most part people consider themselves straight just because there's no chance of them pursuing any gay-interests.

>>8277079

I agree everyone has at least some bisexual tendency. But the degree on which you act on extremely slight bisexual tendencies doesn't make you more or less gay.

A guy who fucks traps because hes an alpha and he knows what he wants and gets it can be a lot less gay than a low test married cuck who only fucks his wife in the missionary position with the lights off when she lets him.

In fact some of the biggest fags are married cucks who are monogamous relationships with women. Thats why most sissy porn is written by 40 yo married dudes (married to wymen). They are repressed cucks who only fuck one woman IRL but are in reality the gayest people on earth.

But being a dominate male and knowing yourself and what you want, a qt trap trying his best to be your girl, and taking what is yours is straighter than most casual "heterosexual" encounters who spend hours beating around the bush just to do mundane ass vagina sex for like 8 minutes then fall asleep.

>>8277034
Do you imply that I am a neologist?

File: 4chan.jpg (1MB, 1652x2424px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1652x2424px

>>8277034
I think anon was referring to this fresh new meme (GAMP).