>Wore this to primary school.
>Carried around a glass bottle.
>Read the communist manifesto in class.
>Sung the USSR national anthem in class.
>Gets suspended for a fidget spinner.
>>8242123
Suspending you for being a communist would infringe on your first amendment rights.
>>8242123
Kys, commie faggot. Nobody wants your dirty ass.
>>8242129
School suspensions aren't the same as actual legal punishments, even if it's a public school, so it doesn't apply. I'm pretty sure if some tenth grader started shouting in class that Jews should be gassed, they would be suspended for it as it's a violation of school regulations, without it being a violation of 1A rights.
>>8242123
>communist
>lgbt
why?
just why?
>>8245353
Why not?
>>8245344
>School suspensions aren't the same as actual legal punishments, even if it's a public school,
It should be if it's a public institution you don't choose to go to.
>>8242123
>Fidget Spinner
>A a new trendy toy, commonly used to help children with ADD/ADHD/Autism either focus or calm down.
Sure explains a lot.
>>8245344
>School suspensions aren't the same as actual legal punishments, even if it's a public school, so it doesn't apply.
Public schools pretty much always take federal money, so the government should be able to hold them accountable to federal laws. Such was the argument with the Department of Education trying to get schools to allow trans students into the bathrooms of their preferred gender.
>Jews should be gassed
That's hate speech, which apparently is not covered by the first amendment.
>>8248156
>That's hate speech, which apparently is not covered by the first amendment.
this is not true. Hate speech is not a legal concept in the united states
>>8247825
No, it shouldn't. That would make schools incapable of functioning. How are you supposed to teach a class when your students spend the whole class talking about irrelevant nonsense and you can't stop them without violating federal law?
>>8248156
>Public schools pretty much always take federal money, so the government should be able to hold them accountable to federal laws. Such was the argument with the Department of Education trying to get schools to allow trans students into the bathrooms of their preferred gender.
No, the fact that it's federal jurisdiction isn't relevant. The fact of the matter is that it isn't punishment in the legal sense, no matter where the school gets their funding from.
>That's hate speech, which apparently is not covered by the first amendment.
People say it all the time online, yet as far as I know they don't get arrested for it.
>>8248260
>How are you supposed to teach a class when your students spend the whole class talking about irrelevant nonsense and you can't stop them without violating federal law?
By following due process.
>>8242123
autism