Bisexual non-biromantic men

B-Biscum?

File: bisexual-gif.gif (404KB, 480x277px) Image search: [Google]

404KB, 480x277px

>>8119114
fake and gay

I'm 20% bisexual and 100% homoromantic

>>8119114
Fellow bisexual here.
As long as you enjoy their company, and find them attractive, then who cares who you pursue romanticall?

>>8119179
Same
Its fucking horrible

bisexual and 100% biromantic
but 100% demiromantic & 100% autistic
so the whole thing it's kinda pointless

Jaysus Chroist, I thought I knew a lot of this terminology already. Clearly not, and it's even crazier with the transgender stuff.

You're "97.5% straight" and using terminology I've never seen before, so I an't even give these percentages, having never really thought about it like that.

File: trump-wrong.gif (414KB, 480x287px) Image search: [Google]

414KB, 480x287px

>>8119159

File: 1476291474223.jpg (53KB, 600x585px) Image search: [Google]

53KB, 600x585px

>>8119114
kek, there's no reason to use the "-romantic" prefix if you're not asexual. if a guy says he's gay you would assume he dates men too, not just fucks them, bc sexuality and romance aren't completely seperate entities. just admit you are repressed biscum.

t. actual bi person who isn't in denial

>>8123460
i'm gynephilic androromantic tho

>>8119114
>as 5% bisexual and 100% heteroromantic
Sounds like what a stupid overcomplicated self-admiring prick would say.
Are you in men or women, after all?
Saying that you can fuck with men but can't love men, makes you a pathetic victim of internalized homophobia in my eyes.

File: 1487563224090.jpg (47KB, 645x968px) Image search: [Google]

47KB, 645x968px

it's sad that monosexuals (aka L&G and straights) have a narrow way of considering sexuality & relationship: grow up and you'll realize soon enough that everything is a spectrum.