"gay" Rights?

>>8027605
Bepниcь нa cocaч, пидopaхa

>>8027605
This is some weak bait but I'm bored enough. What rights are gay people trying to get that straights do not have?

Why should someone's belief in fairy tales grant them special rights?

File: 1490707184600.jpg (119KB, 625x626px) Image search: [Google]

119KB, 625x626px

>>8027605

>>8027738

For example changing marriage to accommodate their sexual fetish. Why would we allow pederast marriage for instance just cause someone is oriented to fetishize such relations isn't a good argument. Or necrophiliacs, like they are trying to normalize in Sweden.

>>8027738

If you think God and morality are fairy tales then so are "human rights" , you have no foundation for them. So your position eats itself.

File: 1424559150034.jpg (36KB, 279x276px) Image search: [Google]

36KB, 279x276px

>>8027605
>whence cometh

>>8030382
What part of consenting adults do you not understand? Why block consenting adults?

>>8030382
I base my morality on the understanding of cause and effect. Human rights are a social contract between the government and citizenry. No mythology needed.

>>8030672

Cause and effect is just what IS.
is =/= ought.
Fallacy.

Social contracts are arbitrary without a metaphysical grounding in morality.

>>8030659

Consent is not sufficient in itself to qualify good behavior. We can consent to incest and necrophilia and being cannibalized.

>>8030961
>incest
>necrophilia
>cannibalism
literally none of these things are morally wrong

>>8030382
It's simple, we perceive that human rights exist because we have made them ourselves. Our morality as a society or race comes from the culture, not the religion.

>>8030911
"Ought" arises from avoiding those things that are likely to lead to a negative outcome. If I point a gun at my head and pull the trigger, then I am very likely to die. That's pure causal analysis. But when we bring in the fact that I don't want to die, that leads to the conclusion that I ought not to aim a gun at my head and pull the trigger. Any sense of "ought" that is totally divorced from causation is utterly meaningless, because the behavior driven by that "ought" is no better than chance to lead to positive outcomes.

everybody in this thread is a retard who needs to realise that morality doesn't matter.

>>8030911
>Social contracts are arbitrary without a metaphysical grounding in morality.
Indeed, whatever could we do without a skyfairy telling us to rape and pillage?

>>8030382
>For example changing marriage to accommodate their sexual fetish.
So what you take for "special rights" is just "right to be married"?

From the start the law wasn't supposed to differentiate between men and women, so there's no shit like "everyone has the same right... to marry the other gender" and you'd only think ilke that if you're an autistic fat kid.

Also don't bother with pedos, we hate them here.

File: 1482914303882224.jpg (8KB, 197x239px) Image search: [Google]

8KB, 197x239px

>>8027605
Homosexuality isn't a sexual fetish. If you weren't inflected with the disease of religion then you'd know this. As a Doctor, I can confirm this and urge you to take your Domestos.

>>8030911
>Christian "morality"

Make serious consideration to killing yourself

>>8030911
>Social contracts are arbitrary
Yep, that is life. Religion continues because people fear death and irrelevance. You are not important. Yeshua was not the son of YHWH. Human life is not inherently valuable. One day you will die and eventually be forgotten.