Why do you sick lesbians like killing little boys so much?

>>7867802
Do you have non anecdotal evidence?

File: Capture.png (46KB, 329x134px) Image search: [Google]

46KB, 329x134px

hm

>>7867802
We hate lesbians too OP.

>>7867851
He's right you know

>>7867819
Lesbians are disproportionately feminists.

File: 1488772398229.png (176KB, 1584x2016px) Image search: [Google]

176KB, 1584x2016px

>>7867802

>thing happens once
>why do all X always do this?

I bet you believe in the holocaust and white guilt too.

>>7867802

LGBT are mentally ill, you cannot expect them not to do mentally ill things.

>>7867802
>'''''''dog dirt'''''''
fuck the fucking Mirror

>>7867853
>>7867876
>>7867893
>>7867894
>>7870464
>>7870502
Do you have non anecdotal evidence?

Lesbians are no more likely to abuse and kill their infant male children than heterosexual women are. The issue is that there is a gender disparity where males are more likely to be murdered and abused and that disparity happened before the male is even born. Mothers of all sexualities are more likely to abort males and are more likely to abuse males. Studies where women watch a child being naughty have shown when the woman thinks the child is male she is more likely to say physical abuse is an appropriate punishment. Infanticide targets males mostly. Also abuse and lack of a father is the leading predictor for later life incarceration, why do you think so many black men are in jail, black women without a father are beating their asses.

>>7872878
>infanticide targets males mostly
Naw senpai. Infanticide is almost exclusively done to murder females. Which is why there is such a disproportionate number of males in the world - not only is a male child more likely to be born, the ratio has been swung off thanks to sexism killing girls.
>when the woman thinks the child is male she is more likely to say physical abuse is an appropriate punishment
I remember some of this. And the MAN was asked the same question and responded that the male child should be given physical punishment. So it's reinforced through fathers and mothers both. And physical punishment is not only meted out to boys. You also have to think about how male children behave and how female children behave or how people expect them to behave.

>>7872980
So female infanticide was a thing in China not because of sexism but because male children were required to take care of their parents and in a society where you only get one child and no social security not having a female child means you starve when you are too old to work.

In ALL first world countries women are more likely to choose a girl when getting artificial insemination, more likely to abort when they know it's male, more likely to give up male children and more likely to kill and abuse male children.

In the study the men were far more equal with their punishment and we also less likely to use physical punishment.

Female privilege starts before the womb it seems.

>>7873067
>So female infanticide was a thing in China not because of sexism but because male children were required to take care of their parents and in a society where you only get one child and no social security not having a female child means you starve when you are too old to work.
That's literally a consequence of sexism though. There's no inherent reason why females can't support their parents, it was because their culture was sexist to the point that it didn't allow females to have meaningful careers.

>In ALL first world countries women are more likely to choose a girl when getting artificial insemination, more likely to abort when they know it's male, more likely to give up male children and more likely to kill and abuse male children.
Do you have non anecdotal evidence?

the lesbos on this board really are starting to make me hate lesbians t b q h

>>7873067
You said infanticide. Infanticide targets females. If you mean sex selection in first world countries you need to provide evidence.

>>7867802
>lgbt infighting using incidental evidence from sensationalist news originally made with bigoted people as the target audience

Wew, (((they))) are more in control than you think...

>>7867802
>killing little boys

You mean future violent, rapists who take out their complex from having a defective chromosome on the fully-chromosomed humans.

File: 72_fig2.jpg (159KB, 911x662px) Image search: [Google]

159KB, 911x662px

>>7873162
Infanticide in the us targets males. Two out of three infants murdered are males.

>In most years, males have been more likely than females to be killed during the first year of life. In 2013, for example, the infant homicide rate for boys was 8.7 per 100,000 children under age one, and 5.5for girls. This gap has generally widened since 1970.

>>7873335
Apes have more of an evolutionary impetus to kill male babies, moreso when the ape colony is experiencing success, since in a successful colony murdering infant males becomes one of the only means of getting rid of competition.

>>7867802
why do straight women get so many abortions, just so they can carry on with their promiscuous life styles?

>>7873335
8.7 boys missing per 100000 children. 5.5 girls per 100000 children. An average of 3 more girls.

When approximately 10 million girls are missing. So I don't know why you want to ignore the issue of girls being killed in larger populations. So the death toll of female babies worldwide is much higher. Males are not missing in the millions.

>>7873594
They're still less promiscuous than straight guys. If gays got pregnant they'd be getting abortions even more.

>>7877533
*than gay guys
obviously

>>7867802
Why are lesbians such terrible people?

>>7867802
Wow, what makes all lesbians want to murder children? Is there any way to cure the psychopathy inherent in being a wlw?

>>7873686
Do you have the rates of infant genital mutilation too?

>>7867851
>tfw you will never get a good dicking from your dad
feels bad