are humans naturally meant to be homosexual?

>>7556469
>Anal sex causes aids
That's not even close to correct. Everything else you said about the prostate was though

>Besides that, men want domination, women want to submit, and they play into each other well...
Is this b8?

>>7556469
Holy shit you sound like a retarded 12 year old who wandered here from /b/.

>>7556469
but I'm a male with 1.0 2d:4d and I like to submit

>>7556562
>>7556469
You sound like someone who hasnt ever taken the std education for sex ed, because aids doesnt just spawn from it, you have to have sex with someone who has it, and also condoms

>>7556617
> not even sure what those numbers mean, but obviously you had shit happen to you to form that way of thinking

prenatal testosterone exposure

it's the ratio of the 2nd digit to the 4th, which is to say index finger is the same length as my ring finger

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digit_ratio

File: 201602_1721_affdi_sm.png (29KB, 300x291px) Image search: [Google]

29KB, 300x291px

>>7556469
Nice post

I'm with OP on this one. Gay love is purest love.

>>7556375
no, humans are naturally bisexual
t. historical human sexuality

>>7556375
I have absolutely nothing to say but the fact that I love that photo.

File: careyshocked.jpg (150KB, 702x756px) Image search: [Google]

150KB, 702x756px

>>7556375
>only
Go back to critical reasoning class you dolt.

>>7556375
Depends on what you mean by natural

Some people will have homosexual by default, but we know this isn't the norm. Is that natural? It's up to you to decided your definitions.

There are a lot of people who would define what is natural as what happens without outside interference, if that's the case then it's pretty clear that the vast majority of people are straight or at least mostly straight.

Some people would define natural as what makes sense from a purely logical perspective. I.E. X+3=Y and X=4 therefor naturally Y=7. From this perspective we can go in two directions, either you can say that the only logical way for humanity to survive is for heterosexual couples to produce offspring, or you can imply that homosexual couples might have an advantage when it comes to pleasuring their partners.

Some people would just define natural as some nebulous term with no clear meaning that is used in arguments to appeal to someone's emotions without any intention of following up if someone calls them out on their bullshit.

In that case, it's clear that individual is naturally a faggot.

That is to say, you're being a faggot, OP. Not the good kind either. Define your terms and then we can talk about it, until that we're all just shitposting here, myself included if you haven't noticed.

>>7556469
I don't know, it seems awfully convienent how accesible the prostate is. Yet the anus cannot handle rough sex like the vagina.

>>7556597
I've an AGP with a 1.0 ratio. I'd prefer to be submissive sometimes but being a man and an adult thats not a good idea. I'm not really dominant naturally, best I can do is be neutral. However, i'm large and kinda masc so I suspect i'm viewed as more dominant than I feel.

>>7556469
MGTOW: The Post

What a sad and pathetic "human" "being" you are.

File: tumblr_nvcwb7gGtH1udbwfeo1_1280.jpg (96KB, 1200x800px) Image search: [Google]

96KB, 1200x800px

>>7556375
>For females, they have a clit. 70% of females cannot cum from PIV. And in porn you always see them flicking their bean even when they're getting fucked. Naturally, lesbian sex involves a lot more eating pussy, fingering, rubbing there and other activities that the clit actually gets aroused by.

true, straight men only know how to please themselves, and each other

>>7556469
Anal sex causes aids?

Roflmao

>>7556375
Homosexuality is not a default its a mental and hormonal illness and abnormality

>>7558104
Higher infecting chances

>>7556469
>anal polyps
NOPE
>AIDS
stds are not exclusive to anal intercourse

Many organs feel extreme pain when directly touched if the prostate is not one of them it's for a rason.

>>7556562
You sound like someone who hasn't spoken with a male OR a female in over two decades.

>>7556562
Aids has had 0 effect on our evolution. It's only existed since the late 70s.

It can't be an argument for why anal sex is bad evolutionarily because it never existed in humans until now.

>>7558123
AIDS has nothing to do with OP's arguments that if anal sex for mean wasn't somewhat beneficial there would be no pleasure for the bottom, you just want to find something to complain about gay sex, even though countless straight couples also practice anal.

>>7556375
You're framing this argument to fit your opinion. Sex is pleasurable probably because we need it to procreate. "Naturally" a majority of the population is straight. I think that homosexuality is a natural phenomenon but I don't think it's the default setting for humans. We're here to make babies.

>>7556375
We all know that the evil that is women stole the ability to reproduce from homosexual men.

>>7558338
>We're here to make babies.
>You're framing this argument to fit your opinion.
You can take your own advice, thanks.

File: 1334895844576.jpg (114KB, 769x672px) Image search: [Google]

114KB, 769x672px

>>7556375

>Is a species naturally meant to do the opposite of reproduction and genetic propagation

This is so utterly fucking retarded it's baffling.