Post'em
Who here is a natsoc faggot?
>>7504122
Moar jpg
I am a tranny btw.
>>7504122
What's voluntary pedophilia?
here
>>7504196
The child and the adult are both consent
>>7504196
Non-existent
>>7504196
It doesn't exist
No choco in my drug harem
I'm alt lite. In that I think homosexuals can be trained to become non-degenerates. They can act like human beings if we try to teach them.
>>7504494
>implying a child can consent
It isn't very clear if “against” means I'm personally against or that I don't practice it.
>>7505232
Well, I'll assume both, then.
I'm pretty easy going for the most part
>>7505265
Why are you against discrimination, race mixing and inequality in pay?
>>7505357
Not him but I guess people againts discrimination and not againts race-mixing just aren't dicks
>>7505411
I mean that laisser-faire implies to let people discriminate or associate freely. With such a mindset, there's no reason to enforce a legal structure that prevents it.
>>7504122
Most points need explanations.
>Same-Sex Marriage
I believe marriage should be a strictly private matter. There should be no law whatsoever about marriage, and no legal "married" status.
>Transgenderism
I checked "personally against" to signify that I wouldn't advise to most people present-days procedures to change your biological sex.
>Polygamy
I believe that exclusive relationships are pointlessly restricting the fundamental liberties of their members. Jealousy is always irrational and destructive. As long as one still receives what s/he received before, s/he shouldn't be sad about one of his/her friends/lovers/whatever is doing outside of their relationship. Also, I refuse to categorize relationships. Each relationship is unique, and therefore must have its own rules and cannot be compared to any other in any way.
>Discrimination (sexual orientation/race)
I don't even understand the problem here. Who would be FOR such discriminations? It looks rather stupid. People should never be defined by their race or sexual orientation, these never matter.
>Equal pay
Again, I'm not sure what it means. I answered by considering that it meant that men and women shouldn't be paid differently for a same job and a same skill.
>Race mixing
I believe it is wrong to actively mix races, as it is some kind of racial discrimination. However, I'm not against accidental race mixing.
>Abortion
I believe it is an extremely complicated matter philosophically and I can see some strong arguments in both sides of the debate.
>Women in combat
Women and men shouldn't be treated differently when it comes to war or violence. However, physical ability can have an importance, independently of gender.
>>7504122
Question to those againts race-mixing why? What actual bothers you so much about two consenting two adults of differing races being in a sexual relationship and having children together? What possible way is it actually bad other than a personal opinion or view that you hold?
>>7505664
I'm >>7505620 (You)
I checked against because I don't want any measure to be taken to encourage race mixing. It would be some kind of racial discrimination.
However, I also believe that nothing should be done against race mixing if it is accidental.
Concretely, it means that having children with someone just because this person is of such or such race is wrong, but that having children with someone for a good reason is perfectly okay regardless of people's races.
Also, when I answered, I interpreted the term "race mixing" in a more social way - not mixing races biologically, but just enforcing quotas, for example for races in jobs, or in works of arts such as movies, or in city districts. My answer is this case is exactly the same, but makes more sense as it is indeed a problem (while noone, I believe, actively tries to mix races biologically).
>>7505620
>I'm not against accidental race mixing
>accidental race mixing
>"WHOOPS! I slipped and my dick accidentally fell in this person of another race for several minutes."
wat
>>7505693
I thinky by race-mixing it literally just meant to allow relationships between differing races like allowing marriage between same sexes, not some conspiracy to create mandatory ethnic cleansing laws.
>>7505620
>same-sex marriage
How would you handle the legal consequences of marriage? I refer to its relevance on inheritance, taxation, children allowance, qualification for a leave when it comes to getting married, parental leave or child illness, children custody, leg and donation, responsibility over assets and liabilities, establishement of a joint fund, hospitalized, incarcerated or incapacitated spouse, and the overall impact on the property regime?
>polygamy
It doesn't make sense on a political level if you're against marriage as an institution.
>discrimination
The question isn't whether you are for discrimination, but against it, and then advocating for an anti-discrimination apparatus. Provided you value freedom of the individual, if I get it correctly, would you defend a company from refusing a transgender or a Black person? I think that's what it meant. It's the same with the equal pay. Do you think a company has a right to remunerate with no restriction, or should it be regulated?
>>7505664
I dislike it, and don't mix. I have no problem with it, but I can understand that it comes down to what one's society is for some people, and how mixing is a threat to the conception they have of a racially uniform community.
>>7505734
>same-sex marriage
Inheritance is now defined by last will. If you want someone to inherit, you say "s/he will inherit". That's all.
I don't see why marriage should have any impact on taxation. Taxation therefore becomes strictly individual.
Children allowance is now given to people who educate children officially. They don't need to be married. Same for parental leave, child illness, children custofy.
Qualification for a leave when it comes to getting married: none. There's no reason for people who get married to work less. Anyone can invent the celebration or party that they want whenever they want and take a leave in a classical way.
For all other points of your list, everyone is treated as independent individuals, just like single people. And if you want to name someone as a person you trust, you can, and it doesn't require any legal apparatus other than a signed letter, like in various legal proxies. You can name anyone as a proxy as simply as that.
>Polygamy
Indeed. I believe that polygamy shouldn't be restricted or treated less seriously than monogomy, that's what I meant. But neither monogamy no polygamy should have a legal existence. These are private matters.
>Discrimination
I see, thank you for the explanation. Then it's a difficult matter. The main problem is that, if the anti-discrimination apparatus is badly done or too extreme, it becomes another kind of discrimination, as I explained here: >>7505700
I believe there should be an anti-discrimination apparatus, but not any. For example, when it comes to employment, I think that the process should be done without any visual contact between the candidate and the employer, unless of course the job is heavily dependent on physical appearance, like for example for actors. On the contrary, I am an extreme defendant of free speach and therefore I'm against the penalization of verbal abuse. I think that many cases need to have their own set of laws in this matter.
Quiver before my mediocrity
>On polygamy if the parties are aware of it then whatever
>On drugs and alcohol, I personally don't smoke, drink or take drugs (except prescription) but I do think harder more damaging/addictive drugs should be frowned upon
im for equal pay for the exact same occupation
>>7505959
My nigga
Hello
>Same Sex Marriage
I dont believe the state should recognize marriages desu, beneficiaries/representatives can easily be named for legal and medical matters. If the state is going to govern marriages then any 2 or more human adults should be able to be married.
>Pedophilia
The age of consent should be lowered in all states to 12 or 13, which is when children can be charged as adults for crimes they commit. I personally wouldnt bang a girl that was younger than 14 or 15. I dont think either of those age categories constitute "pedophilia" which is why I selected "netural/against".
>Drugs
All drugs should be legalized immediately, its the biggest scam of modern government. LMAO @ "hard drugs" vs "medium drugs". You fucking idiots do realize that the US Federal government classifies Marijuana as a "harder" drug than Cocaine right? "No legitimate recognized medical use" right? LMAO fucking plebs trusting government to do anything correctly. If you dont like a drug, then dont do it; government shouldnt be able to tell you what to put in your body.
>>7504122
I mostly don't care except for pedophilia which should be illegal in every circumstance and drugs where I don't think harder ones should be legal.
>>7504875
Exactly.
M-L Tranny
>>7504122
Gay man here
>>7506288
I like you, kid.
I'm fairly open on most stuff. there are some things that cannot be reasonably thought to be ok, though. Meth will fuck a person's life up. should it be legal, possibly, but only so those that need help getting treatment for addiction will actually seek it out.
I'm not morally opposed to marijuana, but I have no interest in using it.
>>7504122
Bisexual cis-scum male here.
>>7507276
>"I'm fairly open on blah blah"
>every political stance of his is based on his feelings
Brainlet spotted.
>all these filthy authorotarians
fucking tyranny up in here
>>7507477
I'm gonna tread on you so hard bb
>>7507488
seize my means of production, daddy
>>7507488
>>7507498
kek
Third world tranny here
>>7507531
I'd euthanize you tbqh
>>7507531
>Racemixing
>For Politically
>Against Personally
behold
>>7507714
I don't like your opinions, but I like how you put a bit more effort into it.
>voluntary pedophilia
Marriage can go fuck itself. Anyone who cares about marriage is a retarded idiot.
Transgenderism, so long as tax payer money ain't going its way it can do whatever it wants.
Nobody is entitled to taxpayer money unless they are doing something productive for society.
Polygamy, for. The fuckers who can get away with it deserve it, the fuckers who can't will suffer worse than a child rapist in jail.
Voluntary Pedophilia. Already happening in government institutions and religious institutions and among celebrities and in Hollywood. Might as well get it over it and legalize.
Discrimination, nope.
Equal Pay. Nope. My platter is more important than someone else's. Fuck financial equality. This is the jungle we live in with finite resources, and i'm gonna fight for them you shits.
Race Mixing. Yep.
Marijuana. Yep.
Medium Drugs. Yep.
Hard Drugs. Yep in injection center with proper regulation. Nope if personal injection.
Alcohol. Yep.
Pornography. Yep.
Abortion. Yep. Death is mercy over being born into forced living with such a dumb retarded bitch whose personality and retardation lead to a need for abortion.
Euthanasia. Only for people who vape.
Women in combat. Yep. Enemy soldiers need some fun time too.
>>7507948
>Marriage can go fuck itself. Anyone who cares about marriage is a retarded idiot.
Ow the edge
>>7507992
You don't need some stupid marriage to love someone,
and you definitely aren't getting married to validate your love towards someone (but to get social benefits);
so between me having an edge and you being a fraud, i'll take that insult with pride.
I'd personally ban marriage outright for everyone in this world, or at least ban all marriage welfare programs for EVERYONE and then see how adamant you are about it.
>>7508021
I will agree with you I think that marriage has become too much of an economic thing rather than an actual demonstration of love but I'd still marry someone even if all "welfare" programs for marriage were abolished. It's the ultimate showing of love
>>7508174
Marriage has always been economic.
>>7508621
It was a religious thing actually.
I stand firm.
Gay guy here.
btw marriage is a social/legal institution so everyone who fell for the "marriage is religious" meme is a moron
:3
What the fuck is the difference between believing something politically and personally?
>>7509361
do you lack the ability to have differing objective and subjective opinions on a single issue?
>>7504131
i would say i am
>>7504122
>all these people for polygamy
what the fuck?
>all the people who support mongrelization
JUST
>>7505664
because of the offspring and more importantly genetic problems that can arise after many generations
>>7504122
why is there a separate column for political versus personal? for example how can you be against equal pay politically but for it personally?
>>7506288
>If you dont like a drug, then dont do it; government shouldnt be able to tell you what to put in your body
i agree except in my country you have public healthcare where it DOES become an issue because when people fuck up their bodies through choosing to put shit in them they were always told was bad it translates into costs for everyone who doesnt use them
i dont see it as an issue in a place like the US where healthcare is private though
Age of consent should be lowered, but if you want to fuck kids you're a sick piece of shit. Otherwise, if it isn't your business, and it only hurts the person doing it, fuck off, it's not your business and that's the end of it
>>7509361
You might, for example, think marijuana should be legal but not be interested in using it yourself
>pic related
>>7509022
Why against marijuana but neutral on other drugs?
Other than that, pretty resonable
>>7511032
Forgot mine
Some kind of marxist
Fuck Stalin and Mao
RIP Lenin, Trotsky, and Castro
DPRK is run by psychopaths
>>7513585
here pic
>>7504122
Pedo here.
>>7504122
In a lot of them I checked neutral, mostly because I don't care like at all what are you doing with your life. You do you as long you're not hurting anyone.
>>7504122
>>7514518
Nice. I disagree on drugs and pedophilia (mfw I'm a pedo) but I admire how sure you are about everything
>>7514518
>>7504122
Get on my level
>>7515679
why neutral on alcohol?
>>7515715
Look, I gotta have my liquid jew, okay?
>>7504122
Radical leftist (anti-idpol & SJW shit) reporting in
>tfw almost everyone in this thread is a subhuman degenerate
>being unironically in favor of polygamy
>being unironically in favor of drugs
I'm not even memeing, this board is literally a cesspit of depraved trannies and leftism. This is coming from a faggot who doesn't even like /pol/ btw, so don't try to pull le /pol/ boogeyman on me. The truth of the matter is that the vast majority of those who've posted on this thread are bottom of the barrel subhuman sluts.
>>7504122
> Same Sex Marriage
Marry who you want.
>Transgenderism
People should be able to do what they want with their bodies. I don't like trans-trenders though.
> Polygamy
If people wanna cuck or have threesomes it's not really my business. Not sure about legal marriage though.
> 'Voluntary' Pedophilia
Minors can't consent. Also gross and creepy.
> Discrimination (Sexual Orientation)
You can't choose these, so you can't discriminate based on them
> Discrimination (Race)
You can't choose these, so you can't discriminate based on them
> Equal pay
Same pay for the same hours for the same effort for the same job. If you want to whine about average pay for each gender, then that's a whole new can of worms.
> Race mixing
Marry who you want.
> Marijuana
Drug cartels will lose money if you can just go to the CVS and buy a bag of weed. Also taxes.
> Medium Drugs (LSD, Shrooms, Ecstasy)
There's really not enough research about these.
> Hard Drugs (Meth, Heroin)
These are way too toxic and addictive.
> Alcohol
I don't drink, but if somebody else wants to, then that's their business.
> Pornography
More masturbation means less teen pregnancy.
> Abortion
Don't want one, don't get one. easy as that. I don't know if I'd want to have one, I've never been pregnant.
> Euthanasia
I have no idea. On one hand, doctors are sworn to try to keep their patients alive. On the other hand, sometimes it's best not to prolong suffering.
> Women in Combat
If a woman is fit enough to perform combat, then let her do it. If not, then don't.
>>7515727
Hitler didn't drink though.
Into the gas chamber with you, degenerate.
t. TruNazi
What the fuck is "voluntary pedophilia"?
>>7508021
Agreed but muh benefits, therefore I am for marriage (and gay marriage by extension).
>>7517800
Some people believe children are able to consent to sex, and that if the child says yes then it's fine.