To non-op MtFs

>>7242725
current surgery techniques are glorified butchery desu

I would rather have FFS paid for, although I also want an orchi.
I have the money for the orchi, I just don't have the ability to get a letter as demanded by surgeons, nor do I have the money to travel intercontinental for it done.

>>7242779

So you wouldn't do it even if you didn't have to pay a cent?

>>7242856
no
not until
>dilation unnecessary to prevent from closing up
>actual natural lubrication
>mucosal interior
>doesn't grow hair inside
basically stem cell

>>7242900
This

>>7242900
you're already 2/4
natural lubrication has been a thing for years + hair is completely avoidable

>>7242987
a little bit of precum is not "natural lubrication"

>>7242999
My doc (who I didn't go with yet and maybe never will) told me he uses part of the urethra for lubrication. Precum comes from the prostate.

>If someone offered to pay for your SRS surgery in its entirety, would you have it done even though you consider yourself non-op
No?
Do you know what non-op means? You probably meant pre-op, didn't you?

Come back when you can offer me ovaries and the entire womb, familia.

>>7242854
You don't need a letter.

>>7243022
you do need a letter. got sent away from the urologist willing to perform the procedure the first time around for not having a letter from a mental health professional. going back today with letter in hand. took 5months to get said letter.

>>7243081
Sorry you had to wait so long, anon. My procedure was done within the first month of contacting the surgeon, no letter required

>>7243108
i think it's more so to get authorization from the insurance company than anything. sometimes it can be a bit of a battle with them for coverage on things like the lupron depot i've had for the past year. i have blue cross blue shield for reference.

>>7243015

And doesn't the urethra carry fluid from the prostate, making it for sure that that lubrication is precum?

>>7243020

No, I definitely meant non-op. There is no point to asking someone who already plans to get surgery if they would get surgery if it was already paid for by someone else.

An anon once said the difference between a non-op and a pre-op trans girl is their bank account. I wanted to see if that held true.

Too many friends have had absolutely horrifying experiences with their "neovagina" for me to ever consider it.

1" depth hahah no that sounds like the beginning to a horror film.

>>7243654
> Too many friends have had absolutely horrifying experiences with their "neovagina" for me to ever consider it.
Can you share some stories? It's hard to get even anecdotal info on the current SRS techniques and their quality.

>>7242725

I'm one of those who actually tried penetrative sex before transition and clearly liked it.

Also, I don't have much dysphoria about my genitals, for me it's more of an "identity" and social thing.

I wouldn't get the srs. I love being a girl with cock. It's great, the most versatile option: attracts men that otherwise would be out of your league (but at the price that only half of the men would actually fuck with you, and only 1 in each 100 would marry you, but hey, I don't wanna marry!).

Also, I'm bi, so if I hang up with a girl, sex is much funnier with a cock.

>>7243125
The part urethra is seperated from the prostate. Vagina is not the same hole as the pee canal

>>7243671
Assume everyone on 4chan is lying when it comes to anything anecdotal anon. Or at the very least giving you 10% of the actual story.

>>7243671
yeah, in one case... literally 1" depth after about 4months post ... Has to go back for revisions. Wow that "super" Thai surgeon sure sounds great. (suporn)

In another case, this girl went to Chettawut... 3 months post and she was leaking fucking excrement from her neovag after going to the bathroom. Sure sounds like that technique of using parts of the colon is a "great advancement" in vaginoplasty.

Finally, a third horror story. This girl skipped electrolysis before surgery, cuz the surgeon said they cauterize all the tissue, preventing any hair groth. Lo and behold, not all the hair follicles were destroyed, and she had to have extremely invasive electro on the interior of her body. I feel for whoever had to go in there and treat those hairs.

Never. I will never fucking do this surgery till we get to >>7242900 anon's description.

>>7242725
Honestly I'm just lazy and don't want to deal with an axe wound between my legs. Orchi was fine. Testosterone was the focal point of my dysphoria. I'd rather have the tinkler removed than a neo-vagina put in. Straight up Alan Rickman in Dogma.

>>7242725
maybe, im mostly non-op because i dont mind what bits i have down there, and i wouldnt want to be stuck with something i dont want

>>7243962
>Trans-trender

>>7244034
yea easiest way to determine glorified "trutrans" people.

But i think most of the unpassable or not pretty ones just can't allow to lose their only sexual partners *ahem, chasers*