Beta orbiters

>>7089334
Afraid you've got one?

>>7089334
I don't think there is a heap of difference to be honest. Betas are attracted to Alphas in the same way beta women are attracted to Alpha males etc. It's just more risky for gay people because obviously they don't know if the other person is gay.

>>7089401
No im just genuinely curious because i couldn't picture any gay dude i know either being or having an orbiter

>>7089334
Yeah, except instead of "beta" and "alpha" it's "bottom" and "top".

>>7089415
Not gonna lie I've done it with a guy I know.

File: 148284_430718833793611_422249967199404021_n.jpg (89KB, 640x636px) Image search: [Google]

89KB, 640x636px

it's all personal. I have a personality like a lot of people find me real cool, but I never pretend to like people, so if someone likes me nd i don't like em back, I kind of just give em the cold shoulder. there is no reason to have lames hangin around me. some people think see a fool use a fool, to me that is not right.

A super attractive gay guy that "has his pick" is almost always going to be a top. In the same way that an average girl that tries to hang around an attractive guy is never really an orbiter, a submissive bottom can't really orbit an alpha top because part of orbiting is the compulsion and deluded belief that they're somehow projecting their object of attraction. Very very rarely so in these cases because bottoms are in high supply.

>>7095620
Isn't a girl a bottom?

>>7096027
you sexist fucker

>>7096049
A dominant girl would be a power bottom no? Is a girl with a strap-on a top?

>>7089405
Also there's the risk of some insecure straight guy going gay panic defense on you.