important question about the blue board Are breasts nsfw on

>>6804868
If it looks female they ban, if it looks male they don't ban.

>>6804888
desu should just ban all chests. This subjectivity is kill.

File: tumblr_m1t6msuVMG1qa2wg5o1_1280.jpg (132KB, 1200x799px) Image search: [Google]

132KB, 1200x799px

This can't be considered pornographic.

I'm sure it depends on context. If it's in a pornographic context I'm sure it'd be a ban, but in a non-sexual context I don't see any problem.

>>6804943
fucking racists

>>6804955
I think this is probably the sane approach.

But it should apply to both sexes.
sexualised topless guy = sexualised topless woman

>>6805085
T b h, as long as it's not hardcore porno, I don't see the bfd. That's just my opinion though.

>>6805167
>>6804955
You'd think, but I've been banned for having breasts in an objectively non-sexual post.

It probably depends on a) the mod and b) if it is reported or not

>>6805193
I didn't get banned but my non-porn, non-sexual selfie showing my breasts got pulled down.

>>6804868
>What is the official 'party line' of mods and janitors?
Of they get a boner you get a ban.

>>6805193
>>6805405
If it's not an object or body part being shoved into a bodily orifice, or someone masturbating, then I don't see the issue. Breasts are breasts.

>>6804943
Radical feminists turn me on.
Hnnnnnng

>>6804943
they look qt.

File: image.png (1MB, 1334x750px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1334x750px

>>6804943
>Muslim women
>lets get naked
I'm confused.

>>6805853
>>6804888
so I guess this is the real way to know if you're a passing MtF