Legit question. Why is it so important for MtFs to cut their

Male privilege

>>5967592

Maybe because they're afraid of "men" raping women in the bathroom. Although I'm pretty sure the SRS requirement for ID change is required for FtMs as well.

>>5967592
Because straight people hath sayeth so.

>>5967592
Patriarchy
Reeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee

>>5967611
It isn't. All that's really required for them is either a hysterectomy or a masectomy. They aren't required to get frankendicks.

Because the average straight dude doesn't think about what equipment other dudes are packing.

File: 1458668868356.jpg (95KB, 640x574px) Image search: [Google]

95KB, 640x574px

Well, surgeons have completely forgotten to invent a decent FTM bottom surgery, so there's that but also it's transmisogyny (if you'll excuse the tumblr-y word). Right-winged men aren't really as rape-hysteric about themselves as they are about their women...and certainly not by one.

>>5967763
lol, are you being sarcastic?

>>5967611
Depends highly on the jurisdiction/state. The US government doesn't require any surgery in order to change your passport or social security records. In my state, you don't need any surgery to change your birth certificate or state ID.

>>5967592
>>5967607
>>5967680

because society doesnt have a place for transwomen, in the eyes of the fearful MTFs are men who don't follow the rules

not to be crude but try to think about it abstractly:

>tl:dr, cause patriarchy
figuratively speaking a 'dickless' man is impotent and not a concern to the powers at be because he's not 'really' a man, he's safe and docile

whereas a woman with a pair of balls is something to be fearful and wary of because who knows how far she could go to disrupt the status quo if her dick is big enough

When people say they don't want to share bathrooms with trannies its never because theyre afraid of FTMs going in mens bathrooms, theyre worried what could happen if a man could sneak into the womens bathroom with their wife and daughters

>>5968579
>theyre worried what could happen if a man could sneak into the womens bathroom with their wife and daughters
As opposed to this being completely legal before anyone proposed a "bathroom bill"

>>5968616
I'm not sure what you meant by this, I'm not saying the thinking is rational but that bill is just a harsher reinforcement of a norm that already existed to keep men in their place


with the growth of LGBT acceptance and visibility, probably more transwomen than ever feel brave enough to break the status and that's what those people are afraid of

in their eyes when you transition and become a woman they literally still say you're a man pretending to be a woman so you can circumvent their social norms and they are afraid of men they can't control

File: fear and safety.png (41KB, 725x242px) Image search: [Google]

41KB, 725x242px

>>5968682
>>5968616
it's a mix of pa
>it's about keeping people from being exposed to the opposite genitalia
>for safety and comfort

except nobody is afraid of vaginas so what makes them uncomfortable?
they want to keep the DICKS OUT and in check,
which goes back to OP when people ask
"Does 'she' still have a penis?"
"Did 'she' cut it off?
"Did 'she' have the surgery?"
what they're asking is
"Is HE still a threat?"
"Is HE going to follow the rules?"

>>5967592
they can't help but be afraid of you until you get rid of the dick, men have dicks
once you've got no dick you're a 'real' woman that they can 'control' and oppress

>>5968730
Makes sense. People are afraid of dicks and any person of any age who happens to have a Y chromosome is passively demonized as a latent rape monster by our culture. Meanwhile females are placated and infantilized as delicate little flowers that can do no harm. The sexism in the double standard is perpetuated by both the paternalistic and moralist patriarchy and "progressive" radical feminists, so it's unlikely to go away anytime soon.

Also what's the deal about 'safety from being exposed to the opposite genitalia'? Nobody's genitals should be exposed, it's a goddamn bathroom.

>>5968579
she could disrupt my status quo :'D

>>5968851
Yeah it's still not really rational seeing as how there's no urinals in womens restrooms
but my guess is it's just the idea of a penis being in the relatively close of vicinity of vaginas in a private nonsexual space like a bathroom immediately brings the thought and fear of sexual violence to mind