Guys, I think FOAB is fake.

>>35133136
y?

>>35133225
He's a Chicom.

Doubt's everything Russian and American.

>>35133280
This. Goddamn chicoms

>>35133280
how do you know he is a chicom

>>35133136

Its just as real as your autism, no need to call it fake because you dont like it

>>35133136
>a really big bomb is fake
?

>>35133225

Only video shows a Blacjack, but it is actually dropped off a cargo plane. Estimate yield of 44 ton but clouds in video (with nothing to compare, that's true) seem to small, based on the velocity at which they move.

FOAB is fucking fake. Just a big air-combustible bomb, but nothing close to what they say about it.

>>35133610
True

Only China can make very powerful bomb with no analog anywhere of the world.

>>35133624

I'm a spaniard, what the fuck are you talking about.

>>35133610
MOAB is a guided air bursting conventional munition (the explosive is comp H6).

The FOAB is confirmed smaller. FOAB is 7.1 tonnes to MOAB's 10.3 tonnes, FOAB only has one guidance system (GLONASS) as opposd to the MOAB's GPS and redundant Inertial navigation system
BUT
FOAB is an airbursting thermobaric munition
thus FOAB has twice the blast radius and more than 2 times the TNT equivalency.

Thermobaric munitions are extremely powerful blast munitions (when they work right), russia is ahead in this field

Doctrinally they are different as well - he MOAB is a replacement for the daisy cutter that can also be used on large targets in the early stages after air supremacy is achieved

FOAB is a straight up conventional replacement for low yield tactical nukes

>>35133664
MOAB is also thermobaric you meganigger

>>35133668

I thought it was just a lot of HE.

>>35133664

>Replacement for tactical nukes.
>0.44 kt yield.

ok

>>35133664
FOAB is an fuel air explosive munition. Thermobaric has some similar principles but it is a different thing.

>>35133664
If FOAB is thermobaric

If FOAB is thermobaric, then why are they not making FOAB munitions for the TOS-1?

BTFO

>>35133136
Ur faek

>>35133668
No, it is just a shitload of high explosives.

And I swear to god if you try using the literal name translation as justification I will shoot my dog.

>>35133668
No its not

File: 1318392374736.png (246KB, 455x343px) Image search: [Google]

246KB, 455x343px

>>35133136
And I think you're retarded

File: 1477389146919.jpg (174KB, 780x495px) Image search: [Google]

174KB, 780x495px

>>35133701
they do, it has only 6km range because it's full of fuck and your friends in football sized area.

>>35133677
Its infact 0.044 kt.

Wich is about half of what a W48-warhead produced.

>>35133668
actually, at this scale it's hard to do thermobarics because you run out of air to mix with fuel.

File: flanders finger.png (182KB, 442x341px) Image search: [Google]

182KB, 442x341px

>>35133136
FOAB is probably real, but the infamous footage is an obvious fake. I suppose the secrecy was the issue, so they just glued some shit for TV together simply to announce it, since 99% of human population doesn't give a fuck anyway.

>>35133664
Literally any information on FOAB is nothing but pure concentrated speculation.