Hey /k/ what's a real life fun that an ayyy would be caught with, real sleek stuff that reminds you of space age tech
>>35131385
g11
>>35131385
P90
>>35131385
>>35131421
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ucOPmeLC83g
Fs2000
M41A Pulse Rifle
>>35131385
RDB
>>35131590
so just an american g11?
>>35131385
TКБ-011
>>35131385
Obligatory posting of the sexy nickel plated Whitney Wolverine from the '50s.
Olympc Arms made a new one in polymer, but while it looks like it could be at home in Farscape or something, it doesn't capture the magic of the original.
>>35131945
It literally is a G11. ACR was the name of the selection program.
>>35133556
Didn't realize that photo was that bad, heres a marginally better quality one.
Though if Ayys are anything like us, in reality it'll probably be white and/or shiny, with a big winter trigger guard and maybe a lever action for charging rather than a traditional bolt handle.
Because trounds.
A Gyrojet rocket carbine, rifle, or pistol(pistol not pictured). Rocket bullets. Concept abandoned because shit accuracy and unreliable ammunition.
can guarantee that nagants will be in every corner of the verse
>>35133687
Funnily enough, shit accuracy would be much less of a problem for Ayys in Space because a lot of it was wind effects at the muzzle where velocity was lowest.
>>35133730
For literally what reason? They're objectively terrible rifles, they were just somewhat historically interesting and cheap as shit for a while.
Now if you said the M2 then you'd have an argument.
>>35133792
>For literally what reason?
sheer force of number of them around
they have been used in every war since their conception
37 million of them give or take a dozen million, they will be everywhere.
>>35132116
patrician taste
>>35133821
>they have been used in every war since their conception
Only because they're cheap and available. Taking a heavy, long rifle to space is not cheap. So nobody is going to take them.
And unlike a STEN or other tube gun, nobody is going to build them out there either because theres no reason to take the step backward even if you somehow technologically regress.
>>35133935
>Only because they're cheap and available. Taking a heavy, long rifle to space is not cheap.
>So nobody is going to take them.
I mean, I assume by the time that guns in space becomes a thing the cost of carting any kind of gun into space is cheap enough that the real cost is in the value of the guns themselves
which means mosins will end up in the hands of ayys
>>35131385
>ayyy
>raifu
stop talking like this
As to your question, probably not a gas-based rifle, since the gas tube would get super hot underneath the handguard of most rifles, unable to radiate away heat in a sensible amount of time. A recoil based or blowback design would be sensible.
>>35133972
what about a piston driven AR with a big fuckoff heatsink as a barrel nut?
https://pof-usa.com/revolution/
>>35133730
Very true anon, nuggets are eternal
Do firearms even work in space ?
>>35133972
So a makarov
>>35131590
Ugly
>>35134230
Yes, fucknut. The only problems are heat control and the state of your lubricants.
what's with all the /x/ posting lately. go home.
>>35131385
>>35131385
South African Vektor CR-21
It'll probably end up in space at some point. It's been everywhere else.