Gimme your best 9mm pocket guns, preferably under $800

>>35106267
P938

>>35106267
It'll get said, but Glock 19/43

>>35106280
>Glock 19
>Pocket gun
Are JNCO's back or something?

>>35106280
Fucking richfags

File: IMG_1245.jpg (509KB, 2270x2270px) Image search: [Google]

509KB, 2270x2270px

Best of the best coming through

I took my G43 w/ flat trigger to the range and my buddy brought this beauty. At that point I had around 200 rounds through the 43... I picked up the sig and effortlessly produced better groups with the first mag. Needless to say the 43 is gone and this is my new favorite carry gun by far

>>35106267
walther pps.

>>35106352
>Glock
>richfags

>>35106564
Name of gun?

>>35106625
Sig P938

>>35106267
shield 45. fuck 9mm

File: IMG_1246.jpg (3MB, 3264x2448px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 3264x2448px

>>35106625
Sig p938

It's similar in appearance to a 1911 but it's based off of the Colt mustang, i.e. no grip safety and a pivoting trigger. The trigger is heavy enough to assuage concerns of an SAO carry gun but short and crisp enough to ensure good marksmanship.

It has less recoil than a comparable G43, but not as soft shooting as it's little brother, the sig p238.

You have to be willing to practice sweeping off the safety like you would with a 1911. It'll become muscle memory with a few hundred repetitions.

I'm much happier with this than any other carry gun I've had, and I've had plenty - Glock 19, Glock 26, Glock 42, Glock 43, Ruger LCR, Ruger SP101, M&P shield, PPS M2...

I've owned and carried them all. They are all great guns but I much prefer SAO guns over any other designs. If I had to have only one pistol, (and for now, I do only have one) it would be the p938.

Fresh OC for you

>>35106267
Shield aint a bad option. Never had a malfunction, its small, fits the hand well, and light. Not really a pocket gun though that said manual safety and a rather heavy trigger makes it mostly safe to carry in pocket without a holster.

>>35106605
He's gotta have deep pockets

>>35106564
i wish the grips looked better desu

File: IMG_1248.jpg (134KB, 880x680px) Image search: [Google]

134KB, 880x680px

>>35106775
There is a plethora of aftermarket grips out there...any flavor you want. Wood, carbon, punisher, Dixie ...

>938

Op asked for a good carry peice, not a lead weight

>>35106267
Kahr CM9. Is chambered in 9mm and can actually be carried in a pocket holster without printing like crazy. Single stack 6+1, but I carry with a second 8rd mag.

Retails for about $400. Runs fine. Takes down easy.

File: Screenshot_20170311-110905.jpg (1MB, 1332x1064px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1332x1064px

>>35106267
Pps m2

>>35106267
The thing I worry about most, OP, concerning pocket guns is reliability. When the mass of slides is reduced and all that stuff semiautos can get finnicky. That's why in my humble opinion you should only use a snubnosed revolver for pocket carry (either S&W or Ruger, avoid Taurus). They are incredibly reliable. Just use FBI approved loads for proper penetration and you're good.

>>35106829
lol. P938 Fully loaded is 21oz, the PPS is 21 oz empty dumb fuck

Sorry OT but I have a noob question.

I know a guy who carries his pistol with electric tapeover the muzzle logic being that it keeps the dust and lint and whatnot out of the barrel while not detracting from reliability or performance in the event he has to draw and fire (with tape still covering the muzzle). Is this actually a good idea?

>>35106873
M1>M2

>>35107003
Thats a nice opinion you have, friend :)

>>35107013
M2 doesnt even have a rail for your Viridian C5L.

>>35107029

who cares just point-shoot niqqa

>>35107029
I'm sorry. I don't need to pretend to be cod for a picky carry.

>>35106267
9mm is not a pocket cartridge. Even the smallest 9mm will not fit comfortably and be able to be drawn easily from a pocket. This is assuming you aren't a fat fuck obese wearing walmart clothing.

The best pocket gun is a ruger lcp ii

>>35106968
No. That's way worse than pocket lint.

It possibly wouldn't interfere much, but you're attaching the slide to the barrel and getting in the way of the slide moving back. If the first shot does not completely destroy the tape, it could bind up the action enough to jam the gun, and if you ever needed the gun that's something you just can't have. Depending on the gun and tape this could either rarely happen or happen every time you try to shoot it like that.

Get a good holster and you don't need to worry about dust getting into the muzzle which should be pointed down anyway so little should be getting in there in the first place.

>>35107044
>The best pocket gun is a ruger lcp ii
Shitty trigger (still), literally painful to shoot, sights are meh, only fits babbyhands.

If you are gonna go up to $800, it's the 938 no contest. Anything else, like a Glock or Shield would just be a way to save money. Having shot them all, the only one I'd actually want to use in a gunfight would be the SIG.

>>35107029
Lol viridian. Look at me, muh light comes on automatically as I draw. That's tactical, r-right guise?

>>35106968
Sounds like one of those bullshit rumors that on the surface sounds like sense. Like driving a truck with the tailgate down to reduce drag.

Unless you're carrying around steel beam that are just the right size to lodge in your barrel, there shouldn't really be anything in your pocket that's worse than an adhesive.

File: IMG_1249.jpg (38KB, 300x300px) Image search: [Google]

38KB, 300x300px

>>35107079
Mein nigger, you know what's up. I'll get another one for pic related

>>35106703
Thanks for this. I currently carry a G42 and have been considering picking up a P938 for carry if not just to standardize my handgun caliber to 9mm, it's my last holdout.

>>35107112
>beam
Should say bbs.

>>35106764
kek

File: IMG_1232.jpg (35KB, 930x621px) Image search: [Google]

35KB, 930x621px

>>35107115
I wanted to love the G42, but they don't work for me. My hands are too large and I can't get it to feed reliably with a two handed grip. One handed works fine but when I use both, I think I'm creating a gap behind the grip which simulates a limp wrist.

I couldn't be any happier with the sig. I love it far more than any Glock I've had by far. Never felt too comfortable with a .380 as a primary anyhow where I feel that 7+1 150 gr hst micros is plenty. The G43 just wasn't pleasant to shoot. The sig is just controllable enough to encourage plenty of range time.

I wouldn't have gotten it if I hadn't shot it first. It's that good. It weighs 5 oz more than a G42 but I'm fine with that considering the trade off.

I plan to get a true pocket pistol at some point, it'll be in the sub 10oz range as I can't stand having much in my pockets. Most likely it'll be a kektec p32 or even a NAA .22 or pic related.

File: IMG_1250.jpg (85KB, 1200x801px) Image search: [Google]

85KB, 1200x801px

These are just beginning production from what I've read

>>35107558
Is it chambered in .22CuteAF?

>>35107079
>Shield
>pocket
Confirming you for a liar, or a giant. Not to be trusted either way.

>>35106280
>light, short trigger pull
>no safety
>pocket gun
I'm not even going to mention the fact that the 19 is almost full size.

>>35106267
P938

File: CMJArktWIAAcvbL.png (23KB, 200x200px) Image search: [Google]

23KB, 200x200px

>>35106795
>aggie grips

>>35108689
You can always use a trigger guard holster on the 43, but yeah I don't know how this retard landed on the 19 being a pocket gun ahead of the 26.

>>35108592
Haha, sounds like another argument against the Shield, not that any more were needed.

I've only shot it, never carried it.

>>35108878
Don't worry it'll be under the counter at College Station Pawn in no time.

People are talking about the p938/238. Fantastic guns both.

Kimber just came out with the Micro 9 which I believe is 238 size in 9mm. I haven't shot it, but the microcarry (.380, basically a mustang/p238) is the best carry gun I've ever shot.

>>35109065
My friend has one of the kimbers, it's a jam-o-matic so he never carries it.

>>35109106
Hmmm. Fair enough. Mine is definitely not. I don't think its ever had a failure in ~800 rounds through it. Perhaps some are lemons.

Not trying to sound like an internet tough guy, but part of it may be grip. Lent mine to a friend once and he had two failures to eject in like 30 rounds. Which I found absolutely bizarre because I get limp-wrist failures with other autos sometimes and that's part of the reason I liked this one so much.

Also not trying to be a Kimber fanboy. SIG is also very nice.

>>35109163
We narrowed the problem down to ammo. Some brands it eats fine, others it just chokes. So the issue is all in ammo selection.

He has a P938 too which is what he carries mostly.

>>35109189
I've read on here several anons who owned these mentioning they literally work themselves apart with use. Anybody have any screenshots or info on this? I love the idea bwhind the sig but am wary about that and about its size in my hand.

Makarov, of course.

>>35110691
I think that's a meme. I can only speak from personal experience, but my friend and I have both put over 1k rounds through ours with no problems.

You know how it is, some limp-wristed fag posts online and memes spread from there.

There was only one real documented issue with the guide rod that affected the initial production runs back in 2011 or 2012 or so. That issue has long been fixed. Just like FN has long fixed their "squishy squishy" issue.

Kahr MK9. Steel > plastic 100% of the time in small handguns. Its still light enough to carry comfortably, but far more controllable than a shield or glock 43.

File: 1501549627055.jpg (3MB, 4128x2322px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 4128x2322px

>>35110909

>>35107113

>dat XBOX HUEG grip

File: mark_it_zero.jpg (249KB, 1600x1278px) Image search: [Google]

249KB, 1600x1278px

>>35111911

>1911
>best digits wasted on Ivan's cap gun

File: SigP938vG26.png (201KB, 773x559px) Image search: [Google]

201KB, 773x559px

>>35111973
It only looks big because the rest of the gun is tiny.

File: P938SAS-2_zps27758484.jpg (122KB, 1024x767px) Image search: [Google]

122KB, 1024x767px

Sexiest P938 model.

File: IMG_1251.jpg (496KB, 2423x1185px) Image search: [Google]

496KB, 2423x1185px

>>35112241
Not mine, but I randomly saved this pic because it looked funny.

>>35106267
lc9s are acceptable.

File: 938-9-ase.jpg (46KB, 581x461px) Image search: [Google]

46KB, 581x461px

>>35112241
No

>>35112727

I wish they'd make an all steel version.

>>35112170
>comparing it to a Glock26
you're retarded, compare it to a glock 42 or 43, or LCP or LC9(s)

>>35110995
You mean better for shooting with it? Why would you shoot a carry gun?

>>35106272

This x10000000

>>35113040
Maybe, but the 43 and 26 look roughly the same from that angle.

>>35115985
Aw yis.

File: image.png (4MB, 1266x1352px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 1266x1352px

>>35106605

>>35114296
>he doesnt want to precisely hit the thief repeatedly in their temple.

File: IMG_2128.jpg (15KB, 310x163px) Image search: [Google]

15KB, 310x163px

>>35107044
I agree with the first half of your statement. Not a single gun posted here actually works as a pocket gun unless you're using extremely baggy pants. It's not just enough for the pistol to fit in the pocket it has to be able to be quickly drawn as well. The one 9mm that gets close is the P/CM9

>>35115985
Jesus did people just have massive pockets in the 20s? I guess Trenchcoats weren't fedora Tier so maybe.

>>35114296
>why would you need to shoot your carry gun?
>why would you need to carry your gun?
>why would you need a gun?
Guns are made for shooting faggot, in a SD shituation you want a gun that's easy to shoot accurately, not just concealable

>>35106873
>m2
Disgusting. M1 or go home.

I have the performance center shield. Other than a long take up, the trigger is decent. It fits larger pockets fine, or disappears in an iwb holster.

File: image.jpg (2MB, 2592x1936px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2592x1936px

>>35116566
If you like the P/CM 9, check out the MK9.


Oh and no. Back in the day they made plenty of concealable handguns. I actually have a collection of antique vest guns, I'll try and find a picture for you of them.

First let's start with the basic bitch of the lot, and yes, the pony is real sterling silver.

File: image(6).jpg (2MB, 2592x1936px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2592x1936px

>>35116919
Check out this one. God I love german guns.

File: image(3).jpg (2MB, 2592x1936px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2592x1936px

>>35116945
Whoever guesses the manufacturer of this gets a golden star.

Hint, its from <1870

File: image(4).jpg (2MB, 2592x1936px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2592x1936px

>>35116961
This one is a Remington.

File: image(5).jpg (2MB, 2592x1936px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2592x1936px

>>35116974
Yes, it has five barrels. It's a .22 cal pepperbox.

File: image(1).jpg (2MB, 2592x1936px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2592x1936px

>>35116986
And my favorite. Guess the model.

>>35116999
You really don't want to know how expensive this little gun is.

File: image(2).jpg (2MB, 2592x1936px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2592x1936px

>>35117015
Forgot pic 2.

http://sigtalk.com/#/topics/7505

Man all this praise for the 938 on here. Then I find this link and I'm concerned about reliability issues.

Anyone here know of this issue?

>>35117066
>http://sigtalk.com/#/topics/7505
I tried to check but its just a main page for the forum. Screencap the post.

File: Screenshot_20170909-112523.png (546KB, 1080x1920px) Image search: [Google]

546KB, 1080x1920px

>>35110947
>>35117085
It appears my subhuman phone posting has provided you with a shitty link.

According to this anon the stuff produced these days aren't subject to the same bullshit.

File: 1503839651362.jpg (80KB, 480x602px) Image search: [Google]

80KB, 480x602px

Is the Diamondback DB9 worth a shit?

>>35116444
unlucky trips

I get practicing with it. I'm just saying I wouldn't very often unless I was in the mood and had a bunch of extra change for it. I'm just saying 99.9% of the time it's going to be a paper weight you carry around on you. I really do like the looks of those khar guns and been kind of pussy footing around about getting one. I got one steel pistol, and one polymer. (neither in 9) I figured the steel one would be the main one and the polymer would be the one for restrictive clothing once in a while. Realistically now it's like I don't see myself ever carrying the steel one over the polymer practically ever aside from a few situations like bigger critters being around.

>>35116566
>Guns are made for shooting faggot, in a SD shituation you want a gun that's easy to shoot accurately, not just concealable
Depends on the situation, numbskull. Sometimes carriability/concealment trumps that. I only applied for a ccw mainly since I've got a lot of death threats over the years. Realistically I don't think they're likely to try it. In my experience people will try to pick fights or arguments if they see you got a weapon on you. Concealing it seems like it'd just better in my situation most of the time.

>>35106267

Where in the fuck can you get a Boberg XR9S Platinum for under $800?

>>35106894
Shut up fudd. Reliable pocket semis have existed since at least the 50s

>>35117199
But its not like they are heavy. A single stack subcompact 9mm weighs next to nothing, even if it's steel. the mk9 weighs just slightly more than a shield.

Subcompacts suck to shoot, but with a metal frame they are far more pleasant. You say you cant imagine ever carrying a metal gun over polymer, but have you ever tried with a proper holster and belt? Its not even noticeable.

If your argument is that plastic guns are cheaper, and so if they are used, and seized by police, its a small monetary loss; fair enough.

File: walther-pps-m2-9.jpg (75KB, 661x496px) Image search: [Google]

75KB, 661x496px

>>35106267
The Best single stack subcompact 9mm handgun is the Walther PPS M.2 anyone who says otherwise is a no guns faggot.

File: IMG_0846.jpg (3MB, 4032x3024px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 4032x3024px

>>35117398
Says the guy posting a stock image.

No guns are hilarious.


>pic related isnt pocket sized, but it feels better than a dick in my hand.

File: IMG_20161224_135625.jpg (122KB, 709x945px) Image search: [Google]

122KB, 709x945px

>>35117416
>How will he recover

File: IMG_20161224_124541.jpg (148KB, 709x945px) Image search: [Google]

148KB, 709x945px

>>35117477
Some more funs stuff with that fun

It was a pretty cool Christmas

>>35117477
That sweater looks comfy

>>35117504
Thanks dude

>>35117477
By laughing at the fact that you have more writing on your gun than in Apple's Terms and Conditions. Christ I thought my sig looked cluttered until you posted this.

>>35117527
Yeah it does kind of suck, it doesnt fade either...

Small price to pay for its performance and ergonomics though.

>>35117477
>literally says warning read safety manual on the frame
Christ, what's next, is walter going to engrave "Caution, lead" on the barrel?

>>35117398
bait
>>35117416
hook
>>35117477
catch
excellent work anon.

>>35110691
Ive read on several forums that said they eject guide rods. Almost bought one and that put me off

File: IMG_20161224_150901.jpg (332KB, 1260x945px) Image search: [Google]

332KB, 1260x945px

>>35117579
Thanks anon

Have this giant dick and balls I blew up with tannerite that christmas

obv oc

>>35114296
To be as familiar with it as possible and confirm reliability. You're assuming your gun will work with the ammo in it, you're an idiot.

>>35117366
>If your argument is that plastic guns are cheaper, and so if they are used, and seized by police, its a small monetary loss; fair enough.

I'm not concerned about that at all.
As I stated before I have multiple pistols. I don't really have any unreasonable attachments they're just an assembly of mechanical parts. I don't really have any problems about using or getting another one if I have to.

My steel gun weights .02 ounces more than a shield. My polymer gun weights way under half of that, it's extremely noticeable. The steel one feels like a fucking brick.

I've never liked polymer guns, alloy always seemed more reliable/durable to physical abuse, but I been thinking about it on and off for a while I can't really see any advantages aside from a malfunction like a round explodes that alloy really has any functional advantages for a gun that will just get carried or, sit around in a safe where it won't see the light of day and be less prone to having problems from me sweating all over it.

>>35106280
>g19

Honestly just slit your wrists drink bleach and jump off of a bridge you fucking parrot

>>35117625
Once you've taken it apart, cleaned it, put it back together a few times. Tested POI or adjusted sights with that type of ammo, you're just over working yourself about reliability if you're not just practicing for the sake of practicing.

File: Kahr CM9.jpg (48KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

48KB, 1280x720px

Of course, the Kahr CM-9.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VCAb3sh9E5g

>>35117611
All balls, no dick. Wonderful style.

File: LC9sPro_01-1[1].jpg (52KB, 600x348px) Image search: [Google]

52KB, 600x348px

LC9s Pro

>>35118007
>you're just over working yourself about reliability
No such thing. I see people on /k/ talking about how their taurus/kimber/ect is reliable because they put 200 rounds of plinking ammo through it, and it's laughable how confident they are. 2k is the minimum for me. I wouldn't carry a gun I haven't put that many rounds through including prospective carry ammo.

>>35119091
Heh 2k rounds, that's over a grand worth of ammo for one of my carry guns. There is no way I'd use that much ammo just to test the function. If you're just testing it with plinking rounds and not the actual ammo you plan on carrying you're just throwing money away for the most part unless it's a really close ballistics match. If I were switching ammo brands or something I could see using maybe a few dozen rounds here or there to test out different stuff or if I just wanted to practice. If I had a grand to throw away on just ammo I'd probably put most of it away for my lawyer fund. I really have a hard time believing you have a grown up job or expenses if you got a grand to throw away on practice ammo.

>>35118855
I have an older LC9 and love it
Will never get LC9s because no safety and its retarded to carry a striker

File: pocket rockets.jpg (1MB, 2263x1600px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2263x1600px

>>35106267
Best is subjective, see the contents of this thread.

But in my opinion, the Shield 9mm is the best pocket gun. I carry it more than anything else, in a pocket.

It's smooth, thin, has adequate capacity, feels good in the hand, has options for caliber, sights and safeties and best of all is CHEAP. Don't forget what dangers carry guns face; scratching, dropping, confiscation.

Sig P938, if it can be found for less than $500, is also a really excellent choice. So is the PPS M2 with rebate (but not full price).

>>35119868
Your post doesn't make any sense. But I guess poor people aren't very smart. Enjoy rolling the dice yanking out your taurus in a pinch.

>>35119868

This could be his main hobby and spending 2k on your hobby after you buy the equipment isn't to crazy.

My family spends like 6-8k a year on race tires for 1 car.

Also 2k rounds over a grand? buying in bulk you'd pay $500-700 for that amount (depending on which bullets you buy) Unless you are buying from local store.

File: Do Want.gif (513KB, 500x330px) Image search: [Google]

513KB, 500x330px

>>35116974
>>35116986

>>35121774
>Also 2k rounds over a grand?
I was talking about the cheap plinking ammo for one of my guns. Higher speed hp' rounds run upwards of a buck each. Buying in bulk doesn't really bring that cost down. Not going to reload on a carry gun, if you had to use it to defend yourself some relative of the deceased would probably show up in some masked antifa outfit and tell you to start writing letters and get on good terms as a pen pal with 'bubba the butt rapist' in prison before they hire some ambulance chaser to sue you.

2k seems really excessive for every gun you intend on carrying unless you're trying some new prototype weapon nobody uses.

I'm not saying there is anything wrong with it. If you need 2k rounds to be proficient then yeah by all means go ahead. It's your life do what you want with it. I don't really think I need to get super proficient with most guns and would rather minimally invest until I find one I really like and want to stick with. Otherwise it just goes into the collection, and I'd practice with it till I felt reasonably confident with it if I feel like carrying it around.

I guess that kind of money wouldn't be a lot but I'm saving up most of my shooting budget as a nest egg for hiring a lawyer before I start spending it on practice or fun. Sometimes that also involves doing cheaper things shit posting on 4chan instead of going out and doing anything fun on a Saturday.

I can give you a glock that I don’t use anymore

File: photo_.jpg (279KB, 896x896px) Image search: [Google]

279KB, 896x896px

>>35106871
>>35116566
>>35118085

hello CM9 bros

>>35107531
And my hands are too big for the sig, at least if I want to use the safety. As much as I would love a pocket auto I may have to go snubby

>>35113040
The g43 has the same footprint as the g26, it's just thinner you twat

File: small-pistol-size-comparison.jpg (128KB, 1057x555px) Image search: [Google]

128KB, 1057x555px

>>35116566
The 1903/08 isn't a big gun, it's also thin as fuck

>>35120002
Carrying without a pocket holster is whats retarded

>>35117611
You put more effort into that dick than I have put effort into everything I've done this whole year.