Tanks

>>35067410
m84
my dad drove it in the war

Is the T14 a meme?

File: regnum_picture_15034326281221610_big.jpg (81KB, 640x428px) Image search: [Google]

81KB, 640x428px

>>35067502
No

File: stalin 2.jpg (56KB, 767x419px) Image search: [Google]

56KB, 767x419px

i like the IS-2. Armor enough to resist the KwK 36 and a gun that would shit on anything, short of maybe a Jagdtiger. And it looks great

File: post-3718277-0-16789200-1399298630.jpg (85KB, 700x537px) Image search: [Google]

85KB, 700x537px

Bob Semple

The little tank that could

File: bmp.png (1MB, 761x822px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 761x822px

bmp facts:
>bmp is fast
>bmp is bmp
>bmp shoot good
>bmp will deliver infantry to fuck u up at hihg sped
>bmp can swim
>bmp can bubbi tanks with atgms
>bmp bestiest friend of tank

Are Americans putting any effort into tanks at the moment besides marginal upgrades? It feels like we're just focusing on air-to-ground anti tank shit.

>>35067410
M1A2. Cause I'm a practical man and I like proven combat performance and high-quality Western engineering.

>>35069258
>It feels like we're just focusing on air-to-ground anti tank shit.
If we blow all enemy tanks then our tanks just become expensive to run, moving bunkers. At that point we might as well use cheaper, more maneuverable APCs and do the usually pin enemy down then 1000lb bomb their position.

>>35067410

T-72.

Ever since I nearly got run over by one while cycling a forest trail in Poland, I've been in love with this little machine that bites.

And it keeps the Muslim population in check as well, all across the globe.

File: ZTZ-99.jpg (295KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

295KB, 1920x1080px

ZTZ-99
>I like Chinese stuff, pls no bully

File: Otomatic.jpg (45KB, 600x430px) Image search: [Google]

45KB, 600x430px

>Hey Macaroni!
>What is it Lasagna?
>I have this brilliant ideaa
>What if we takea thisa 76mm dual purposeo gun..
>bibbiti
>..meant for the ships..
>bobbiti
>..and put it on a tank?
.
.
.
>Mama mia, it's a perfecto!

File: Stridsvagn_103_S_Tank_main_battle_tank_Swedish_Army_Sweden_015.jpg (69KB, 907x510px) Image search: [Google]

69KB, 907x510px

>>35067410
This thing right here

>>35069589

does anyone know how well this preforms in battle?

>>35069716
pretty well; it should go to battle already assembled from the factory

>>35069716
>76mm AP and HE rounds with variable setting fuzes
>meant to take down helicopters mainly, but more that capable in killing everything short of a modern MBT front

Gee, I wonder how well it would do..

Panzer IV G

It's sexy and not as meme-y as the Tiger.

>>35069605
Me too. The designers took an extremely unconventional idea, and went as far as they possibly could with it, and it worked well! I liked the audacity of it.

File: 35a01647830faef5588fc4f419aa6c32.jpg (197KB, 1500x933px) Image search: [Google]

197KB, 1500x933px

this is my patriotic choice

>>35069809
Ayyyyy my dude. PZ IV G is that good shit.
>Dem sideskirts

>>35069863
>M1A2 turret
>Tiger II (?) chassis

Same scale?

File: Panzer IV variations.jpg (884KB, 2400x800px) Image search: [Google]

884KB, 2400x800px

>>35067410
Can't really decide, generally I like WW2 tanks the most though. I'll post a few that I like.

File: Churchill Mark II tanks.jpg (472KB, 2000x1485px) Image search: [Google]

472KB, 2000x1485px

>>35069967

>>35069966
>Tiger II (?) chassis

File: M4 Sherman.jpg (366KB, 1280x1004px) Image search: [Google]

366KB, 1280x1004px

>>35069976

File: Comet tanks crossing the Weser at Petershagen, Germany, 7 April 1945.jpg (359KB, 1772x1787px) Image search: [Google]

359KB, 1772x1787px

>>35070001

File: M13-40 of Italian XX Armored Corps.jpg (381KB, 1600x1103px) Image search: [Google]

381KB, 1600x1103px

>>35070015

>>35069928
>>35069809
>PZ IV G is that good shit.
confirmed not knowing about PZIV

File: Panzer III on the Eastern Front.jpg (379KB, 3000x1936px) Image search: [Google]

379KB, 3000x1936px

>>35070027

File: Panzer V.jpg (513KB, 1920x1200px) Image search: [Google]

513KB, 1920x1200px

>>35070043

File: Stridsvagn 42 urban combat exercise 1944.jpg (405KB, 1600x1760px) Image search: [Google]

405KB, 1600x1760px

>>35070060

>>35069977
Well is it or isn't it?

Is it a Panther A chassis?

File: MexTank.jpg (97KB, 1335x742px) Image search: [Google]

97KB, 1335x742px

This thing.

>>35070101
ausf.d or a. also, that's a usmc m1a1 turret

File: AZ_tanks_ver1_small.jpg (268KB, 1000x2600px) Image search: [Google]

268KB, 1000x2600px

>>35067410

File: M26 Traverse.gif (2MB, 360x270px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 360x270px

>>35067560
Agreed, though I'm quite partial to the M26 as well.

File: Israeli Super Shermans during the Six-Day War.jpg (846KB, 1600x1002px) Image search: [Google]

846KB, 1600x1002px

>>>/wsg/1799541

File: pokpung-ho_ii.jpg (239KB, 740x486px) Image search: [Google]

239KB, 740x486px

>>35067410
POKPUNG-HO TANK! MOST SOPHISTICATED AND TECHNOLOGICAL EQUIPMENT OF POWERFUL AND ECONOMICALLY ADVANCED DEMOCRATIC PEOPLES REPUBLIC OF KOREA. UNDER DIVINE LEADERS GLORIOUS RULE THE PUNY IMPERIALIST US AND PIG DOG CHINA PUPPET WILL BE CRUSHED BENEATH ITS MIGHTY TREADS!

>>35067604
Really disappointing to me that they didn't keep on this route and instead went with the wunderweapon bullshit of the T-14 (or so it seems so far).

>>35067410
M1a2

File: Chieftain Stillbrew.jpg (3MB, 3648x2736px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 3648x2736px

Pure. Sex.

>>35070027
>Ravioli Ravioli Lost The War For The Third Reichioli

>>35069863

kind of cool looking

File: T30_Heavy_Tank.jpg (64KB, 778x396px) Image search: [Google]

64KB, 778x396px

>155mm
>5
>5
>m
>m

>>35069818
>The designers took an extremely unconventional idea
come on, it's StuG 2: The Return of AssGun

>>35071410
Don't you mean Stug 5

>>35067410
Historically: The Panzer V "Panther" because I think the idea of a gothic T-34 makes me hard.
Modern: Merkava IV, the Israelis have had more than half a century of armoured fighting and put it all in one beautiful, near-perfect machine of death and destruction.

>>35067410
the Sherman
fuck you thats why

File: 7-leopard-2-mbt.jpg (106KB, 600x400px) Image search: [Google]

106KB, 600x400px

Always and forever

>>35067410
Bob semple

You can take a nap while shooting

Sherman, half because I'm murican and therefore biased towards everything from this great nation of ours, half because it was the quintessential tank of WW2. It worked well, had acceptable upgrade potential and acceptable mobility, was able to coordinate well cuz radios and was reliable and easy enough to fix that we didn't have the problems the T-34 had when teething (at least not at the same scale) nor the same fuckery that the Panthers had. Most importantly, no other chassis was as versatile. For example, no other chassis could be a medium tank and heavy/assault tank (Jumbo) or even jury rig a bigger gun to allow it to fill the roles of a tank destroyer depending on what armor you welded on or what gun you gave it.Call them zippos all you want, but the fact is that when planning military strategy in a WW2 setting you'd be remiss to not at least consider the Sherman as a tank of choice.

File: m1a2-sep-USA[1].jpg (695KB, 1280x854px) Image search: [Google]

695KB, 1280x854px

The best of all time.

>>35069863
>MBT 2000 refitting

>>35070107
Funny to think that Mexicans had full-tracked APCs before everyone else...

File: abramssun.jpg (103KB, 1000x620px) Image search: [Google]

103KB, 1000x620px

>>35067410
OH SAY CAN YOU SEE

File: 1492890471571.jpg (120KB, 988x688px) Image search: [Google]

120KB, 988x688px

>>35072831
>B-but muh Ronson!
>5:1!!!
>bad gun!!!!!!!

File: M67 Zippo.jpg (674KB, 2089x1151px) Image search: [Google]

674KB, 2089x1151px

>>35072831
>Zippo
A few years ahead of yourself there...

>>35070176
That show was hot garbage.

>>35073278
>OH SAY CAN YOU SEE
IT'S THE YOU ESS EMM SEE

File: eYS9CuY.jpg (142KB, 1280x920px) Image search: [Google]

142KB, 1280x920px

>>35073194
I think they were the first to have tanks in South America.
Though, I don't know much about tanks, I should read more before I make statements like this.

>>35069716
It was never procured by any armed forces.

>>35067410
Merkava, the shape of the turret is great

File: Leclerc-openphotonet_PICT6015.jpg (212KB, 1280x851px) Image search: [Google]

212KB, 1280x851px

Always liked this guy

>>35067410
T-80
Thought it was cool when I was a kid, and it was fun in Wargame

File: PT-16.jpg (3MB, 3264x2064px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 3264x2064px

>>35067410
the look

File: 9be5815a3ac8be5c4c3050b094614133.jpg (761KB, 1399x1299px) Image search: [Google]

761KB, 1399x1299px

>>35067410
Good Allrounder

File: Char B1 Bis Flandres.jpg (2MB, 3072x2304px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3072x2304px

my favorite tank ever, it's adorable and was a badass

File: tank.jpg (216KB, 1920x1280px) Image search: [Google]

216KB, 1920x1280px

>>35067410
Prime kebab removing machine.
I like the 4m more, but damn this is a good picture.
I'm kinda biased to merkava though.

>>35070475
I can hear that North Korean broadcaster who sounds like Paul Bearer saying this.

File: 1499091943451.png (907KB, 960x540px) Image search: [Google]

907KB, 960x540px

This is technically a tank, right?

>>35071326
Wrong, they didn't help, but they didn't cause the defeat either.

>>35070475
I audibly expressed humoration.
I shouldn't have, but I did.

>>35073673
That jacket and stance is even more intimidating than ze machine.

>>35069846
>tam 2
i for one like it. it's like a panther fucked an m8ags

File: 8b1.png (666KB, 1126x845px) Image search: [Google]

666KB, 1126x845px

>>35076194
HUMOR IS DECADENT, THE GREATEST JOY IS THE JOY OF DUTY!

>>35067634
>bmp can swim
Track propulsion sucks. BMP can only swim in ideal conditions.

File: foto-tanque-argentino-mediano.jpg (48KB, 550x400px) Image search: [Google]

48KB, 550x400px

The TAM (Argentine Medium Tank)

>>35069425
>high-quality Western engineering
>american made
Pick one

File: grK4Nrs.jpg (122KB, 800x554px) Image search: [Google]

122KB, 800x554px

idk how effective it really is but damn do i like its aesthetics

File: 501861-f48f3ecc-0d46-11e4-b520-c4b498d9eaca.jpg (61KB, 650x488px) Image search: [Google]

61KB, 650x488px

Definitely the Matilda.

I've long nursed the secret dream of somehow coming into the requisite money and time to build an aquatic facsimile of one with those trippy treads that work on both water and land, so I can putt around the harbor like some sort of retarded take on the Monitor ship concept. Go fishing. Sunbathe. Fire blanks out of the cannon to baffle ships full of Chinese tourists. The good life.

File: oplot.jpg (297KB, 1280x748px) Image search: [Google]

297KB, 1280x748px

2sex

>>35075508
>leave /k/ for a year
>come back to this
holy fuck tits

>>35070982
desu Armata has better (ie. *actual*) crew protection while new Oplots pretty much compete with the Black Eagle's capabilities, or even outshine it.

>>35076176
Its a tank support vehicle but yeah, its on a T-72 lol.

File: 20604453_1400523716650911_3569053914916595982_n.jpg (7KB, 250x250px) Image search: [Google]

7KB, 250x250px

>>35076209

I fucking love it, I love how german it looks

>>35067634
HIS NAME IS BEH EM PEH
Learn pronouns, shitlord

>>35076683
Иди нaхyй мyдилa

File: 3.jpg?x87865.jpg (76KB, 720x478px) Image search: [Google]

76KB, 720x478px

>>35076661
cool
>ywn drive a Terminator blessed by Assad himself
why live

>>35076277
Dubs don't lie.

>>35071410

Not in any way. There was tons of other assault guns, even in Sweden. If they would have wanted something like the Stug they would have invested in more IKVs...

>>35067501
I remember you anon

File: risunok-su-85-srednyaya-po.jpg (437KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

437KB, 1920x1080px

The SU-85.

>>35070475
Are... Are those T-62 ?

>>35067501
Stories?

File: 554874185848.jpg (500KB, 2050x1397px) Image search: [Google]

500KB, 2050x1397px

>>35077269
Not him but i remember his dads story, really comfy in a way.
The tank came from Slovenia, at the start of the total yugoslav war, the yugoslav army retreated under gunfire from slovenia and convoys of army equipment and made its way to bosnia, i think.
Then the war in bosnia started and the tank was in service of the Bosnian Serbs, broke trough the corridor 92 (famous battle) and got hit from the front by rpg 2 times, didnt penetrate.
Got used as a towing vehicle for many machines, kitchen and bathroom appliances, tv's, expensive furniture, everything worth something that was taken.
Marauding and smuggling is what the south slavs are known for.
Then at the end of the war if i remember correctly, nato got involved and serbs in croatia were all expelled, but that anon mentioned that he was a tiny kid back then and his dad got relieved and drove him in the tank just before the yugoslav army (Serbia) took it away across to their territory. Mentioned he saw the thank being repainted and tidied up before a parade when Putin shoved up in Belgrade for a visit.
His dads tank is still alive and in service, could end up in Kuwait, because they buy the serbshit a lot.
I forgot the nickname of the tank.
The tank is basically a modified t72.

And he mentioned 8ball from Kelly's heroes for some reason i cant remember

>>35077328
Cool

File: aQe4MPr_700b.jpg (58KB, 640x711px) Image search: [Google]

58KB, 640x711px

https://www.wired.com/2015/06/heres-can-buy-russian-tank/

I dont need a new car, or a new computer, or new paint for the house, or a new cupboard, or a new washing machine.
Id even leave my gf for a t72, fuck, even a t55 if she had problems with me giving 50k for a tank. And barrels upon barrels of diesel.
Id go on adventures as soon as i found people that will let me drive it across their land, even take them with me.
In winter. Dressed and armed in slavshit.

File: leopard-2a4-mbt-germany-3d-model-obj-3ds-fbx-c4d-lwo-lw-lws.jpg (174KB, 1500x1125px) Image search: [Google]

174KB, 1500x1125px

>>35067410
I like the classical Leopard 2 A4 , tho not as well protected as later models I still like the simple turret design .

Also I knew online two persons who crew the leo2A4 at the time ( separate tanks )

one tied the Simpsons dolls to the rear antenna and got spray painted in pink "flower power" by some locals when their tank was on the train carriage that stop at the country side for some shit reason and the MPs that came over to take a look had a good laugh .

Then while on maneuver he (gunner) told me they could see bunnies making out at night (thermal night sight) at over 2000m . . .

File: thermal image.jpg (17KB, 320x240px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 320x240px

>>35077972
>Then while on maneuver he (gunner) told me they could see bunnies making out at night (thermal night sight) at over 2000m . . .

Thermal vision is scary, imagine you're an infantry soldier at night without a clue about the enemy...

M-82AN
Because wargame memes

File: avre165_g3.jpg (32KB, 489x258px) Image search: [Google]

32KB, 489x258px

>Destroys your bunker

File: Centurion tank.jpg (284KB, 1788x1083px) Image search: [Google]

284KB, 1788x1083px

>>35078119
>Looks /fa/

>>35076349
>High quality engineering
>Eastern made
Pick one

File: 16066374.jpg (30KB, 600x278px) Image search: [Google]

30KB, 600x278px

>>35067410
I just love how angry the T-90 looks.

File: 1503550419663.jpg (121KB, 750x745px) Image search: [Google]

121KB, 750x745px

>>35078528
PRIVYET COMRADE

File: Leopard2.jpg (18KB, 279x182px) Image search: [Google]

18KB, 279x182px

(1) Looks cool
(2) Good all round stats

There is an old game, Very old, called Steel Panthers 3. You can build custom scenarios or use some pre made ones. You can string together these scenarios into a Campaign. You get to keep your "army" from the previous scenario , even upgrade it. BUT you can grab scenarios from any time and stick them in there. So I made a custom game. 1st scenario had to be modern 1999 (highest year the game has) but the rest of the scenarios came from world war 2.

Premise of my campaign was Time traveling group goes back in time To save Germany in world war 2. So Modern Leopard 2s vs Hordes of soviet T-34s and IS 1s , Stopped the Russian advance over a series of battles , Swung west. took out hordes of Shermans.

You actually can lose tanks especially to air attacks but have a massive advantage in tech that off sets limited numbers. Fun as hell to play through even though I had to spend hours designing scenarios . Trying to get enemy army compostions at least plausible.

And that's why Leopard 2s are my favorite.

>>35080177
Forgot to mention, Turn based, and needs to run with an emulator. Found one for free on line that works great. Games free too if you can find it.

>>35080177
>(2) Good all round stats
Man, I wish it was true in [spoiler]Armored Warfare[/spoiler]

File: 4005.jpg (160KB, 500x332px) Image search: [Google]

160KB, 500x332px

>>35071354
>155
>not 183

this thing fired 200lb HESH shells

File: A8TigerTank.png (379KB, 1024x542px) Image search: [Google]

379KB, 1024x542px

>>35067410
I wish someone would built that one.

File: size.jpg (1MB, 1400x2342px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1400x2342px

But what if i like all of them

>>35080594
The trouble with Armored Warfare is that everything after the Fox feels like a massive disappointment.

>>35077174
It's probably T-72 variant, as it has 6 roadwheels.

The T-62 has 5 roadwheels, like the T-55. Best way to tell the T-55 and T-62 apart is roadwheel gaps--the T-55 has the big gap up front, the T-62 in rear.

>>35080177
Count me in. But I like it cuz I was smart enough to check the "tanks" field when they asked me what I'd like to do during military service :)

File: 1490082203092.jpg (103KB, 1280x691px) Image search: [Google]

103KB, 1280x691px

>>35067410

File: TsarTank 1.jpg (233KB, 1022x376px) Image search: [Google]

233KB, 1022x376px

Tsar Tank. If i ever win in the lottery, i will build it.

>>35081840
That thing would have sunk in the mud because of all the ground pressure.

Also I could totally see Yuri blowing a chunk of the front wheel off with the cannon.

>>35081725
The French certainly did make some aesthetic weapons of war.

File: AMX-13-latrun-2.jpg (163KB, 1124x752px) Image search: [Google]

163KB, 1124x752px

Amx 13 t
BecausE I want that cute fucker in my garage

How hard is it to buy one

File: australian-sentinel-ac1-mk1-cruiser-tank.jpg (76KB, 650x385px) Image search: [Google]

76KB, 650x385px

i'm a nogunz ausfag so i have to like this piece of shit

File: Leopard 2SG.jpg (3MB, 4000x3000px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 4000x3000px

>>35080656
>Soon, mein freund, soon

Actually good taste though.

>>35080177

Still the best military strategy game IMO. Doesn't seem like much at first glance but they get everything right. The best way to win is to use real world tactics.

>>35067583
God fucking bless

File: Armata.jpg (209KB, 1600x900px) Image search: [Google]

209KB, 1600x900px

Cause it's the best!

File: PL-01(1).jpg (332KB, 1280x743px) Image search: [Google]

332KB, 1280x743px

>>35083659
Serious question regarding the Armata;
They've designed it with all of these faceted surfaces in an attempt to reduce the vehicles RCS, right? So how come they left the barrel untouched? I know it was only a body-kit, but the PL-01 had an angular jacket around the barrel for this purpose. Why not just slap a bit of sheet metal on there?

>>35080712
>Brezhnev Eyebrows
>T72

File: 1200px-Type10MBT.jpg (244KB, 1200x800px) Image search: [Google]

244KB, 1200x800px

>>35067410
Banzai

>>35085164
this thing always seems to me to be like an up-armoured leo1

File: 140mm canon Leclerc mbt.jpg (75KB, 1000x541px) Image search: [Google]

75KB, 1000x541px

>>35067410
Brcause 140mm are sexy.

>>35083793
CV90 with a bodykit. Poland actually managed to rice a tank

>>35080682
Nah, the problem is the obvious russian bias of the devs, where russian tanks for some bizarre reason deal a fuckton more average damage than western ones, despite just 5mm of caliber difference, and also reload faster.

And then there are the truly OP tanks from the chinese line, but nobody complains because nobody plays chinkshit except good players who are smart enough to not complain to the devs about chink tanks being fucking amazing

Also for AFVs the new czech/polish AFV line is fucking magical

>>35086596
Your armament is invalid, it should say.

File: k penistank.jpg (855KB, 2590x1710px) Image search: [Google]

855KB, 2590x1710px

>>35081936
>can't unsee

>>35071598
>Merkava, one beautiful, near-perfect machine of death and destruction.
> the only modern tank known to have been destroyed several times by RPG-7
Anon, something's wrong here...

>>35080712
Retard. One of the specific things of note with the Pokpung-ho is the extended chassis with the six road wheel. It's a T-62 at heart dude, this is pretty well established. I bet you think the Romanian TR-85 is also a T-72 or some shit even though it's derived from the T-55.

>>35086824
Actually it's a combination of a Leopard 1 chassis and a Type 79 turret with a romanian designed gun and electronics.

>>35086855
Uh... no? Neither the Pokpung-ho nor the TR-85 is either of those things

>>35086855
>>35086908
The only Leopard 1 thing about the TR-85 is that it was based off the TR-77 that was extended for a Leopard 1 engine.

>>35070374

>[RARE] Newly uncovered footage shows a Panzer actually driving multiple meters without the transmission breaking!

File: sentinel.gif (4MB, 327x194px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 327x194px

>>35086737

File: Panzer IV.jpg (675KB, 2400x1554px) Image search: [Google]

675KB, 2400x1554px

>>35087273
>hurr durr Wehraboos made me angry that's why all German equipment was shit
these are Panzer IVs btw, a little outdated but very reliable vehicles. See here if you're interested in the Panther (yes, it was still comparatively unreliable): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SmXEly5_u38

File: Type-74.jpg (301KB, 1024x698px) Image search: [Google]

301KB, 1024x698px

This is my fav. Looks like someone mated a Russian tank turret with an American tank body.

>>35087367
>very reliable
late model pz.iv final drives were as fragile as the panther's

File: 123456789.jpg (43KB, 600x890px) Image search: [Google]

43KB, 600x890px

>>35087738
Unsupported track on a late 20th century tank?

File: Panther tank.webm (1MB, 320x240px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 320x240px

>>35087790
which model (Ausfuehrung) of the Panzer IV?

File: images.jpg (7KB, 259x194px) Image search: [Google]

7KB, 259x194px

>>35080177
I PLAYED that the memories, Germany vs soviet union was my favorite campaign as was the isreal Syria 1999

>>35083793
My guess, it isn`t "complete" set of equipment for T-14. In combat situation, at the very least, the "nakidka" IR-masking cover supposed to be used. Bad thing, it looks completely unimpressive, so, ill-suited for parade. Most likely, if the anglea are actually for RCS reduction, some kind of addon kit for barrel is also included.

>>35069605
Low profile

>>35082063
That body kit is not bad to easy to do upgrade the Leo2A4, only problem I see is that it keeps the gunner's sight gap in the armor. For the A5 they removed that weakness and moved the sight upwards which involved redoing the interior and welding and stuff.

>>35087307
lewd

>>35069586
What if Chinese people are like Linux people and just love when stuff breaks so they can fix it all the time and learn something new?

>>35076043

>Kebab removing machine

Lol no, the Zionists are the biggest ISIS enablers there are.

How many ISIS militants fell to the guns of the Merkava?

Oh right. Not fucking one, in fact, IS shares a border with Israel and there are no incidents alongside it...

Zionists are scum.

File: tumblr_nl7wsbs2Ho1t382eqo1_500.gif (2MB, 450x218px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 450x218px

T-80 rubs my cold war funny spot since I played OFP.

>>35089818
You got good taste, the RHS mod for arma 3 got it in different sexy versions

>>35087821
to be fair, Japan doesn't need tanks anyways, considering they aren't doing what 1900 Japan was doing

>>35089765
>Israel attacks somebody
>this is a humanitarian crisis how could you let this happen
>Israel doesn't attack somebody
>do they even care about human rights look at what everyone else in the region is doing

File: T90A.jpg (1MB, 2250x1500px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2250x1500px

>>35078528
>>35079553

Which specific versions of T-90 have the "angry eyes?" I have seen some versions with them (like the T-90A) and some without.

File: Type-61-uc-hardgraph.jpg (94KB, 761x506px) Image search: [Google]

94KB, 761x506px

Can it be fictional?

>>35069605
where is tank?? hello??

>>35090647
Why do the Zekes have a Feddie tank?

>>35090833
I believe the Zaku in the pic had been captured by the Feddies a la MS IGLOO.

>>35072853
What's that on the hull top is it a plow attachment or something?

>>35090833
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tZuZdykKwxE

File: pz3n.jpg (71KB, 700x465px) Image search: [Google]

71KB, 700x465px

Late war Panzer III's, particularly the Ausf N

>>35092888
Correct it is a mount for a mine plow or dozer blade.

>>35069589
>macaroni and lasagna
>not mario and luigi

File: sexu.jpg (3MB, 4755x3170px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 4755x3170px

>>35075630
Honestly, I wouldn't be surprised if Russia realizes the T-14 is beyond their capability to produce in number and end up going back to just upgrading and making more T-90A's and similar.

>>35093652
*upgrading their current fleet of T-90A to T-90AM and making more

>>35069605
why would you post picture of plain forest?

File: Sibmas_Malaysian_army_Malaysia_wheeled_armoured_combat_fighting_vehicle_002.jpg (48KB, 500x427px) Image search: [Google]

48KB, 500x427px

Can I play too, senpai? (90 mm armed Sibmas)

File: P0g31b.jpg (626KB, 2560x1573px) Image search: [Google]

626KB, 2560x1573px

>>35067410

>>35090646
I'd say these metal plates over them are just to cover them temporarily, in combat scenarions they are uncovered

File: agds_m1_by_1wyrmshadow1-d53kdnj.png (417KB, 1000x649px) Image search: [Google]

417KB, 1000x649px

>>35090647
how fictional do you want to go buddy

>>35093652
>>35093681
Russia's current procurement activity indicates a snall number of T-14/T-15 and most of their tank funds going to T-72B3, T-90M and T-80UE1 upgrades.

>>35069586
>ZTZ-99
That's a ZTZ-99A, big difference

File: armata bingo.jpg (146KB, 777x960px) Image search: [Google]

146KB, 777x960px

>>35067502
Yes

I don't come on here enough anymore

File: mineroller.jpg (76KB, 736x552px) Image search: [Google]

76KB, 736x552px

>>35092888
It's the mount for mine rollers

File: Schofield_1.jpg (46KB, 550x285px) Image search: [Google]

46KB, 550x285px

>Wheels behind you

Chinese battlemaster tank with uranium shells upgrade

File: 1496769311835.jpg (200KB, 1071x480px) Image search: [Google]

200KB, 1071x480px

>>35067410

File: 1944-Buick-M18-Hellcat-Tank-Destroyer-front-three-quarters-in-motion.jpg (1MB, 2048x1360px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2048x1360px

Gun Carrier, but it's close enough.
HELLCAT BEST CAT

>>35067410
The PZ V Panther because the Germans couldn't make a bad tank if they wanted to. Even the worst designed flops are hand crafted masterpieces.

This actually bit them in the ass as the Soviets basically swarmed them with kludged together pieces of crap but it's still nice to see a well made machine.

File: 1497234661982.png (523KB, 695x467px) Image search: [Google]

523KB, 695x467px

>>35073618
the ignited fuel looks more like a laser in this picture

File: 1492869228438.png (112KB, 777x786px) Image search: [Google]

112KB, 777x786px

>>35080648
>seven shot auto loader
if only it worked

>>35080648
>hit a tank in the side
>crew of 5 tanks behind it dies due to spalling

File: comettankisbesttank.jpg (15KB, 282x179px) Image search: [Google]

15KB, 282x179px

>>35067410
Fast, reliable, decent armour (for small arms, 20mm, and artillery fire) excellent QF 77mm (effectively a 17-pdr) with APDS, boiling vessel, British crew.

>implying anything more than Christie Suspension needs mentioning

File: 1402672209223.png (350KB, 1046x362px) Image search: [Google]

350KB, 1046x362px

>>35098199
oh, it did work it was just retarded

>>35098209

Comet would have been one of the best tanks of the war if it had entered production a few years earlier.

>>35098209
anything with the 17-pdr makes me hard

File: type10andtype74-1.jpg (712KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

712KB, 1920x1080px

>>35067410

File: p1000.jpg (58KB, 600x450px) Image search: [Google]

58KB, 600x450px

p1000 rattle it has fucking two 320mm main cannons and 20mm anti aircraft guns

File: Reservists_Training_to_be_Challenger_Tank_Crew_MOD_45156297.jpg (3MB, 3000x1997px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 3000x1997px

I mean, there's only really one choice.

File: Trojan_AVRE_Tank_Cuts_Through_the_Afghanistan_Desert_MOD_45152047.jpg (1MB, 3000x1886px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 3000x1886px

An cute!

File: Russian T-10 heavy tank Time Magazine.jpg (97KB, 590x792px) Image search: [Google]

97KB, 590x792px

I want to marry a T-10m

>>35098232
...
The only FV4005 prototypes is a few hours drive from me, I've seen it up close

File: 300px-T-10_tank.jpg (26KB, 300x188px) Image search: [Google]

26KB, 300x188px

>>35099535
Woops wrong pic

>>35069605
HOW DOES IT SHOOT A MOVING TARGET?????

File: 1502366719034.jpg (338KB, 1679x1022px) Image search: [Google]

338KB, 1679x1022px

>>35092979
>Pz. III
My african american

>>35078015
I am in the german army and a guy recently showed me the thermal sight of the Fennek scouting vehicle.
Damn you could literally see what people had in their hands from multiple hundred meters away.

>>35099595
traverse all of it. It was a very precise system

>>35076683
I laughed way too hard at this

>>35098232
I want to know what kind of APDS performance you could get out of a fuckhuge gun like that. Or even just pure AP like the M103 had.

File: trojan 2.jpg (117KB, 800x600px) Image search: [Google]

117KB, 800x600px

>>35099475
I know the Trojan is, as AVREs go, under-armed (seeing as previous ones like >>35078119 have had big ol' demolition guns on them), but it just looks mean

File: trojan.jpg (39KB, 550x369px) Image search: [Google]

39KB, 550x369px

>>35100151

File: Trojan_Armoured_Engineer_Vehicle_on_the_Salisbury_Plain_Training_Area._MOD_45157697.jpg (3MB, 3000x1997px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 3000x1997px

>>35100151
It's just the way battlefield constructions are nowadays. No need to break your way into a big fat bunker with a tank if you can drop a bomb directly on it instead
AVRE's are just for building, mineclearing, destroying sandpeople hovels, etc
Besides, we don't have AVRE's on their own in enemy territory. They have support.

File: Warriors_of_The_Royal_Regiment_of_Scotland_MOD_45156559.jpg (4MB, 2400x1597px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 2400x1597px

Warriors are so fucking hot
I kind of can't decide if I like them without all the trimmings or if the skirts and bags laden on them just add to the appeal

>>35099844
Okay, so it wasn't the standard 7.2 inch howitzer, it had a longer barrel

Wiki gives me 92kg and the only fucking place i can find the muzzle velocity for the lengthened tank version is the damn war thunder wiki at 716m/s

lets assume those values are correct, that is 23.5MJ of muzzle energy. Compared to about 28MJ for the 120mm M256 on the abrams

But that is firing HE, which usually has a smaller powder charge and kinetic energy favors velocity over weight (formula is (M'V^2)/2 )

the M256 firing a slow ammunition, like HEAT, get sonly 13 MJ of muzzle energy

Meaning if you use the M256 as a reference, and doubling the muzzle energy by using AP, the 183mm L4 gun will have almost 50MJ of muzzle energy

which is a lot

>>35096303
>backup sites
>sites

File: 1495945012407.jpg (83KB, 400x399px) Image search: [Google]

83KB, 400x399px

>>35085190
Funny, to me it looks like a chibi Leclerc. Not op.

m1 abrams

File: r9OIW4I.jpg (215KB, 2065x1264px) Image search: [Google]

215KB, 2065x1264px

>>35067410
North Korea is best Korea

File: 1504567655661.jpg (26KB, 320x264px) Image search: [Google]

26KB, 320x264px

>>35071310
(You)

File: FV4005 Stage I(1).jpg (101KB, 928x711px) Image search: [Google]

101KB, 928x711px

>>35098199
>>35098232
I'll just leave this here
https://pastebin.com/KnP4VNyx

>>35098478
>17-pdr

File: 1497229171483.jpg (176KB, 785x567px) Image search: [Google]

176KB, 785x567px

>>35100322
>50MJ of muzzle energy
fund
it

>>35067526
Yes it is Ivan

File: t-90 syria.jpg (56KB, 960x720px) Image search: [Google]

56KB, 960x720px

>>35090646
T-90 and T-90A have them, as well as M-84AS and T-80UK. T-90S and T-90MS don't.

>>35102892
>He's standing right behind me, isn't he?

File: t-90 bears.jpg (307KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

307KB, 1920x1080px

>>35102925
Lol.

File: post-1581-0-21471900-1459744282.jpg (77KB, 1200x577px) Image search: [Google]

77KB, 1200x577px

Ex-cuuuuse me

>>35095879
What's the difference?

>>35095879
To be fair, from that angle it's pretty hard to tell, at least for me; the main visual identifier between the two vehicles is the 99A's longer turret, but with the foreshortening in that image it's hard to tell how long the turret actually is.

Reminder that Russia is reactivating/updating it's T-80's for Arctic missions.

That means there will be T-72B3s, T-90AMs, T-14s, T-80UMs and T-80BVs being built/updated. How can Logistics/Maintenance ever compete?

>>35104788
you're excused actual fucking decepticon

File: t-90a (4).jpg (676KB, 2048x1536px) Image search: [Google]

676KB, 2048x1536px

>>35104788
EXCUSE ME FOR DROPPING IN

>>35087821
its a really light vehicle, as heavy as a T-55

>>35105036
What about the T-80's make them more adept for arctic conditions anyway?

>>35105505
gasoline doesnt freeze

>>35105441
>125mm
look at this faggot and his tiny gun

>>35105507
Diesel freezing? Do you mean the paraffin gelling? If so that makes sense then.

>>35105522
im just talking out of my ass, i dont fucking know what the fuck is going on anymore

>>35105527
>>35105522
You're not wrong though. Diesel will start to gell around 32F/0C which makes it thicker and can cause issues, versus gasoline (high octane) doesn't start to have issues until its like -70F. I was just asking that guy if there was anything else.

File: 1485709477583.jpg (606KB, 1380x1442px) Image search: [Google]

606KB, 1380x1442px

tanks have souls

>>35105036
Good old Soviet tradition of having 3 different MBT in service simultaneously.
>>35105505
Gas turbine.
>>35105512
Says who, a 120 mm western sissy boi?

File: t-72av (3).jpg (128KB, 1019x677px) Image search: [Google]

128KB, 1019x677px

>>35105552
Tanks are beasts of war.

what's the oldest tank to have shown up in action east recently?

>>35105652
>action east
In action in the middle east*

>>35080712

>It's probably T-72 variant, as it has 6 roadwheels.

Nope. It just has extended chassis. You can see the gunners sight on the right side of the tank and commander's cupola behind the gunners position and there is one more hatch on the left side of the tank so it's safe to assume it has a human loader.

What really baffles me is that they still haven't developed a periscopic gunners main sight with integrated LRF but instead even in their newest tanks there is an opening for the old T-62 style telescopic gunners sight on the turret front and the LRF is a box on top of the gun.

File: t-55 syria.jpg (584KB, 1600x1200px) Image search: [Google]

584KB, 1600x1200px

>>35105652
T-55 is used widely there.

File: DElY_EdV0AEX5hM.jpg (139KB, 1000x550px) Image search: [Google]

139KB, 1000x550px

>>35105647
Too right mate

>>35105652
t34

>>35105735
Really? Where? I think I saw SU-100, but that was somewhere in Africa, IIRC.

>>35067560
>IS-2
Pros
Lighter than Panther while being better armored than Tiger 1. Cannon had 3 times more KE than short 88. Didn't even needed to use AP rounds HE ussually was enough to give any tank a bad day. Impressive mobility for a heavy tank in WW2 standarts. Reliable transmission and powerfull diesel engine. Easy to maintain and carry on trains, so good logistics.
Cons
Cramped ass hell. After the turret ammo is used reloading became problematic. Okay FCS but no match to German ones. Lots of weakpoints in design, like guntrap.

>>35075630
Even though I like how new T-90 looks and all shtora system. Knowing that it uses weak diesel engine with WW2 levels of transmision makes me dislike that tank. Even IS-2 can reverse faster than T-90.

>>35105798
Yemen

File: su-100 yemen.jpg (67KB, 800x600px) Image search: [Google]

67KB, 800x600px

>>35106107
Shot, you're right. And the SU-100 I was talking about was apparently from Yemen too.

>>35106052
>it uses weak diesel engine
How is 1130 hp at 25,11 hp/t weak?
>WW2 levels of transmision
Well memed.

>>35070374
0.19 sec
>this kills the eardrums

File: t-90ms (2).jpg (2MB, 2250x1440px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2250x1440px

>>35106142
>at 25,11 hp/t
My bad, it's 1130/48=23,54. Still though, M1A2 is like 23,07 and Leo 2A5 is 24,07. So how is 23,54 hp/t weak?

>>35106142
>>35106173
T-90 is T-72B3+++ T-72s uses T-55/54 transmission T-55/54 is WW2 desing build in 1946. T-90s had 830hp V12 diesel engine 1130hp V12 is the new one. Ruskies better use that latest X12 engine that can give 2000hp in emergency 1500hp in normal situations. All T serries can't neutral steer or pivot like all modern tanks.

File: pt76 (1).jpg (85KB, 700x477px) Image search: [Google]

85KB, 700x477px

>>35067410
PT-76
High speed, low drag

>>35096303
>no driver's periscope

Are you blind?

>>35106249
Have those ever been successfully deployed? As far as I recall, the PT-76 has BTFO'd every time it has seen any major use.

>>35106238
>T-90 is T-72B3+++
No, T-90 is Object 188 that was originally intended to be called "T-72B Improved" and was essentially T-72B with T-80U electronics. T-90A is a T-90 with the turret of the rivalling Object 187, a completely new MBT that was cancelled due to the collapse of the USSR. The only think that barely resembles T-72 in modern T-90 is chassis.
>T-72s uses T-55/54 transmission
Well memed.
>T-90s had 830hp
T-90 had V-84MS with 840 hp. That's original T-90 from 1993. T-90A has 1000 hp V92S2 and we're talking about the new T-90MS here, dummy.
>1130hp V12 is the new one
It's called V-92S2F, nigger.
>V12 diesel engine
>Ruskies better use that latest X12 engine that can give 2000hp in emergency 1500hp in normal situations.
>All T serries can't neutral steer or pivot like all modern tanks.
Nigger, please, do be a troll elsewhere.

File: 243784.jpg (103KB, 1000x541px) Image search: [Google]

103KB, 1000x541px

>>35106259

Here's a photo of the tank. The arrangement is commander on the starboard, gunner on center, driver on port. There's something behind the driver and its not for the gunner.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=Yz0bLY7hXxI

>>35106400
I'm not talking about engine names I'm talking about their desings. 12 pistons aligned in V shape and X shaped 12 piston.

Tell me the reverse speeds of T-64/80/72/90 with showing sources. Prove me they're faster than 4km/h. Prove me if one of them can do this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aEPjfIO5jeg

File: t-14 (9).jpg (172KB, 1280x911px) Image search: [Google]

172KB, 1280x911px

>>35106411
Nigga u dum?

>>35106411
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=TQLG0bOy7SY

Reminder that Armata is so shitty that it even misses a straight up target.

>>35106435
No. What's you're point?

File: 6cbb001948c48389e268b441b43de9aa.png (153KB, 361x289px) Image search: [Google]

153KB, 361x289px

>>35106453
but that didn't miss....?

>>35106453
>misses
>shows clearly a hit in the center
kek

>>35067410
What if the T-14 is just a T-90 with an extra road wheel and some boxes attached?

>>35106431
>Prove me they're faster than 4km/h
It's 4.8 km/h and bout 30 km/h on T-90MS that we're talking about.
>Prove me if one of them can do this
http://hlamer.ru/video/666214-Tank_T-14_Armata
0:50. Go be fat elsewhere.

>>35106541
I knew you were going to say T-14 even after I said.
>T-64/80/72/90.
>one of them.

I>t's 4.8 km/h
Woah thats a lot faster than 4km/h.
>MS
finally ruskies realized reverse is something important for tanks.

>>35106596
You said >>35106238
>All T serries can't neutral steer or pivot like all modern tanks.
Then you moved goalposts probably realising you've fucked up.
>>35106596
>Woah thats a lot faster
Yeah, that's like 20% faster.

>>35106259
There are periscopes that the driver can use when the seat is reclined, they just don't work and can't see over the front of the vehicle and so they are never opened.

File: Challenger_2_Tank_Firing_a_Shell_at_Night_MOD_45157416.jpg (1MB, 3000x1688px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 3000x1688px

>>35099460
>That Dorchester

File: Challenger_2_Main_Battle_Tank_patrolling_outside_Basra,_Iraq_MOD_45148321.jpg (3MB, 4064x2704px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 4064x2704px

>>35106821
Everything about her is so beautiful
She's one of the very very few tanks I think looks better in sand yellow than any other colour

>>35106706
>they just don't work
Nice proofs you got there. A shame if its obvious your talking shit.

>>35093652
>I wouldn't be surprised if Russia realizes the T-14 is beyond their capability to produce in number and end up going back to just upgrading and making more T-90A's and similar.

They already have.
https://web.archive.org/web/20170831191753/http://www.janes.com/article/73474/analysis-russia-looks-to-bridge-armour-gap

File: MBT-70.jpg (36KB, 600x367px) Image search: [Google]

36KB, 600x367px

I like the general look of the MTB-70, it is a good combination of old and new.

File: Berlin_Brigade_Chal2.jpg (168KB, 1024x768px) Image search: [Google]

168KB, 1024x768px

>>35106917
Yeah I agree, the standard olive looks too dark.
How do you think they look in good old Berlin Chequerboard? I really like it, getting those Dazzle pattern disruptive vibes going on.

>>35067560
Couldn't it only be loaded with the gun at a specific orientation?

>>35086264
Tell that to the Ramka.

File: Challenger_2_Tank_Firing_at_BATUS_MOD_45157782.jpg (2MB, 3000x1231px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3000x1231px

>>35107182
It really doesn't work without the wheels being painted as well
Really, I can't say I like camo on tanks all that much
The best, aesthetically to me, are simple one or two tone paintjobs
Maybe it's all those unpainted/primed only prototypes have spoiled me on the idea of it

>>35107241
>Ramka
old news
the new hot shit is the Rosomak M1 friendo
>designate someone
>fire two self guided missiles
>2004 damage done in 6 seconds
>finish them with HESH autocannon

File: nuclear starship.jpg (394KB, 1156x812px) Image search: [Google]

394KB, 1156x812px

>>35107192
i've not heard anything about that. I know it was cramped and 2-piece ammunition is a bitch to load, but nothing about that

pic unrelated

>>35105652
Not a tank but SU-100 was filmed fighting in Yemen last year. One got blasted by an ATGM and went up like a volcano, as you'd expect

File: Zagan_Czolg_T34-85.jpg (826KB, 2507x1547px) Image search: [Google]

826KB, 2507x1547px

T-34-85, easily
>has a hidden armor plate behind the driver's hatch
>bounces just about every shot off its armor, otherwise shots taken at it just don't penetrate at all
>shoots APHE that can penetrate absolutely everything, practically ignores armor
>turret traverse speed is faster than any other tank during the war
>also the fastest tank of the war
>won the war
I cannot name a better tank than this one

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RYiLz-TSghE
I like about 12 of these in a strike unit punching trough the defenses, supported by migs, flame artillery and infantry from the BTR's.

File: tiger_tank.jpg (248KB, 900x592px) Image search: [Google]

248KB, 900x592px

>>35107330
"nein"

>>35107259
Only because I recall a coh2 commentary where the guy would spout random facts
And the is2 apparently had to level its gun to reload
I imagine the is2 was a shitty dueler
But then again you're never duelling when its Russian industry

>>35070001
that's actually the m4a1 sherman
not the m4

take notice of the cast hull

>>35107330
Did the 85 win the war?
I would've thought the il-2 played a big part
>undownable flying tonks versus disabled luftwaffe
Every documentary likes to forget who made the most tanks and planes of wwii when possible

>>35107420
It doesn't really matter who made the most what when half of its on fire.

>>35105507
you're saying t-80s use gasoline?

>>35106167
VAS

>>35107428
>the half of what's left is still as much as what your allies and enemies have left
>Combined

>>35107467
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gas_turbine#Tanks

>>35107749
you're saying the "gas" in "gas turbine" is derived from the word gasoline?

>>35107758
>running on diesel fuel, kerosene, gasoline or their mixtures in any proportion without readjustment;
http://klimov.ru/en/production/landmarine/GTD-1250/

>>35107770
yes, gas turbines can use many fuels, thanks. your links do not show that the t-80 runs on gasoline.

>>35107784
It literally says exactly that.

File: BoohBees.jpg (7KB, 280x239px) Image search: [Google]

7KB, 280x239px

>>35107259
>Inherent in the 152mm gun design was the potential for future nuclear warhead use.

File: Libya-USSR_T72M1_underpass.jpg (190KB, 768x1024px) Image search: [Google]

190KB, 768x1024px

T-72
There are dozens of different variants all across the world and the see combat everywhere. They are not particularity good but are actual weapons of war, rather then propaganda pieces which will never fire a round in anger.

>>35107825
oh sorry i didn't realize when it said "The engines of the GTD 1250 family are capable of running on diesel fuel, kerosene, gasoline or their mixtures in any proportion without readjustment" it meant the soviet/russia army used gasoline as a fuel in their battle tanks. the abrams engine can run on all that shit, too, but neither the us army or marines or anyone else who uses it runs it on gasoline. jesus christ.

>>35105507
>>35105538
Gasoline freezes.

File: t-80bv (7).jpg (350KB, 1920x1305px) Image search: [Google]

350KB, 1920x1305px

>>35107841
>neither the us army or marines or anyone else who uses it runs it on gasoline
Probably because the former think -10C is cold and real winter 'n shiet and the latter are literal sandniggers who have never seen snow in their entire life.

>>35107927
ok. i'll just be here waiting for you to back up the assertion.

>>35107902
Yeah, at like -50C or whatever was the exact value.

STuG a cute. But serious,i had a model Stug i loved looking at,gave it to my old bro manager when he left for a new job. Outside of that? Probably the T-80

>>35107937
Whatever, I'm not autistic enough to go around trying to prove I'm not a camel to a random assburger from /k.

>>35107965
nah, you're just a dipshit who says russia uses gasoline in its tanks

>>35107398
Oh like lower it. Well yeah that's not improbable, many big guns depress so they can be loaded easier

>>>35070032
Pz IV chassis pretty good though isn't it?
>Adapted to artillery
>adapted to 1-2 assault guns
>adapted to 2-3 SPG-AT roles
>adapted to 2 kinds of AA guns
You could say they were stretching its life beyond reason but an impressive lineage either way

File: 1444309205572.jpg (74KB, 600x600px) Image search: [Google]

74KB, 600x600px

>>35107979
They use aviation kerosene, assburger. And here's why:
>combat readiness of object 219 at low temperatures was 1.5 to 2 times higher than that of tanks with diesel engines
http://opoccuu.com/t-80.htm

>>35108110
>assburger
kek that was my entire point: they don't use fucking gasoline.

>>35107259
got the link to the book?

>>35108347
>Implying there's significant difference between kerosene and gasoline in the context of the subject
There isn't.

File: yourenotfoolinganyone.gif (2MB, 550x479px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 550x479px

>>35108370
afraid i don't