New Engines for the J-20

File: c4a9a039gw1f8w2zussm7j21yv1b6u0x.jpg (99KB, 1622x1080px) Image search: [Google]

99KB, 1622x1080px

>>35056816
Previous engines related.

Note the deeper flameholder.

File: {728E4E0E-D76F-49E8-B7C4-F05976FB03EE}.jpg (424KB, 2044x1219px) Image search: [Google]

424KB, 2044x1219px

will bestkorea bring us soon J-20 vs. F22 ?

>>35056816
How feasible would it be to remove the canards? That's really the only thing stopping it from BTFOing an F-35

File: clipped canards 10-20 GHz X-band Ku-band RCS -30 dbsqm F-22 level stealth.jpg (158KB, 789x1010px)

158KB, 789x1010px

>>35056829
Canards are less the problem than the backend.

Canards themselves do not produce as big of a radar spike as the rear part, especially since they can be coated in RAM and built with radar absorbing material.

File: {0577FAD2-45F4-4959-B7FB-93C9E06EA0E7}.jpg (455KB, 1271x1220px)

455KB, 1271x1220px

>crosses your path

File: canards grey metal white radio transparent composites.jpg (26KB, 548x714px)

26KB, 548x714px

>>35056835
*built with composites.

>>35056835
>Canards are not a problem to stealth
I'd love to see a source for this

File: F-XX Boeing.jpg (553KB, 1600x900px)

553KB, 1600x900px

>>35056840

>>35056829
>That's really the only thing stopping it from BTFOing an F-35
Sure thing, LingLing

>>35056816
So, 300kN for a plane two meters smaller than a Flanker.

That's really not bad.

>>35056846
>One reactor goes off

File: J-11B + WS-10A rear mod.jpg (402KB, 959x1057px)

402KB, 959x1057px

>>35056816
>>35056824

Nice.

That's clearly a WS-10 derivate. The internal structure is a tell-tale sign.

Now, the J-20 is 100% indigenously producible, without relying on Russia anymore for the engines.

This fact alone would give China considerable strategic advantages over their asian rivals.