No other bird even comes close.
And don't even bring up the Rafale, that shit's ugly as balls.
>>35047452
because it was designed by Brits.
>>35047452
>Rafale
>shit's ugly as balls
Sure
>>35047452
It looks like someone bought a second hand F-16 and put on aftermarket bodykit to look like a Rafale.
>>35048127
>>35048131
>t. frogs
Raf literally only looks decent from the front, any other angle looks boring and uninspired. Like 3rd gen garbage.
>>35048146
Lies, latest Rafale versions is like, atleast 3,5th gen. Maybe even 4th gen
>>35047452
FACT: f-4 phantoms are the most powerful race in the world
>>35048697
That's what it is, not how it looks. You dumb autist.
>>35048910
post the viggen please
posting some bunda
>>35049009
post more
>>35048112
except it wasnt :>>>
>>35047452
It looks like a freaking RC toy.
>>35049023
hell yes
>>35049081
You look like an RC toy.
>>35047452
Gripen in one solid color is sex af.
Also my planefu
>>35047452
The Gripen not only doesn't have a good aesthetic, but also fails its only job of being a capable low-cost fighter.
Instead it's design is uninspired and it offers mediocre performance for above average cost.
its shit
>>35049317
The latest E variant is performing beyond all expectations and you're uninspired.
>>35049350
i don't like the gripen but that's a model plane
>>35049350
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8yf_QTbDeWM
>>35049373
The Gripen E also costs 15 million more than an F-16C Block 50/52 with modern system upgrades while having comparable performance and a smaller load of fuel and ordnance.
>>35047452
Even though she is expensive, still would ram.
this is swedens true fighter
HIC
SUNT
DRACONES
>>35049023
>>35048112
>British jets
>Not being abhorrently ugly
Pick one.
>>35050848
>Expensive
Wut
Cost is the only thing Gripen has going for it.
>>35051687
Supposedly has a really nice pilot interface as well
>>35051687
its like 80 million now
why are swedes such cucks
i think its because of karma and vikings or something