What's the ATF's stance on pistol bipods?

>>35014075
Modified Weaver, to accurately hit that pup of yours.

>>35014075
Retarded just like you

File: bidenlaugh.gif (504KB, 209x209px) Image search: [Google]

504KB, 209x209px

highly illegal

>>35014075
Rip dingo

File: 1504057629140.jpg (117KB, 652x876px) Image search: [Google]

117KB, 652x876px

>>35014075
not sure but hide dog

Bipods on handguns are perfectly fine unless it is something like a grip-pod, or any other bipod that readily doubles as a vfg.

>>35014075
pretty sure they ok they're a thing with chargers and other rifle caliber pistols

Only blankshit, but hey who cares.

File: IMG-20170809-WA0000.jpg (998KB, 4608x2592px) Image search: [Google]

998KB, 4608x2592px

>>35016132
Forgot pic.

>>35014134
Lmao this is good

>>35014075
No. Bi-pods come standard on 22 Chargers...so ATF cant do shit