beaten enfield

File: 21169241_1787828138169708_113168788_o (1).jpg (297KB, 2048x1152px) Image search: [Google]

297KB, 2048x1152px

>>35005397

File: 21150800_1787828134836375_280630262_n.jpg (44KB, 544x960px) Image search: [Google]

44KB, 544x960px

>>35005404

year, model, maker?

>>35005397
Great deal assuming everything headspaces right.

>>35005422
I didn't even think to look. Its a no 4 mk 1 made in England.

>>35005427
pawn shop said he had it head spaced by their gunsmith and said it checked out.

>>35005448
Rear sight and grooved foreend were north american designs.

>>35005397
Holes in inside of the receiver are bubba from the looks of it. Steer clear.

>>35005566
That's not quite true, grooved handguards were common from a variety of manufacturers in the '41-42 period, and the Mk2 expedient sights were made by virtually everyone not just on Mk1* rifles. Of course this all means nothing since all kinds of parts from all over were put on them both during and post war.

>>35005397
>What you think /k/?
Not with those holes drilled through the receiver wall. At some point someone tried to scope it.

Those holes in the receiver are a little funky....
I'd still buy it. $250 for an Enfield is a steal in 2017. That's 2010 prices, buddy.

>>35006811
So put a scope on it. What's the problem? This isn't a museum piece. Can you imagine if someone drilled holes on you for an attachment, and suddenly you were considered garbage by neckbeards and passed over for your added functionality?

Guns are people too.