if you remove the trigger from a semi auto ar15, load a magazine in, pull the bolt back and then release it, would it expend the entire magazine in automatic fire since there is nothing there - mechanically - to catch the hammer?
also - would this be considered a felony?
The hammer would probably just ride the carrier as it goes forward and not have enough momentum to smack the firing pin hard enough to fire.
>>34999958
shit you're right
it would be worth a try, though
>>34999939
>if you remove the trigger from a semi auto ar15, load a magazine in, pull the bolt back and then release it, would it expend the entire magazine in automatic fire since there is nothing there - mechanically - to catch the hammer?
No, it wouldn't.
hexes
>>34999981
party pooper
I would assume the hammer would lock the bolt up on a half chambered round similarly to how removing the disconnecter supposedly messes shit up
Some fella did this with a Sten, called a 'sputter gun', labeled a machine gun by the ATF
>>34999939
yes, and this is why we need a new assault weapons ban. no american needs to have firearms like this. also, no one is trying to take your guns aways, mouth breather.
>>35000146
>mouth breather
the 2017 term is "incel virgin" btw
>>35000160
incel?
>>35000177
INvoluntary CELibacy
i.e. someone who can't get laid no matter how much he wants it
If you can fire an ar15 without a trigger that'd be useful to me since in trying to save money in all parts of my build