So that is it... revolvers are look nice and if you really want

Nice b8.
S&W .460, with low power variable scope and bipod. YES, I SAID BIPOD IN CONJUCTION WITH HANDGUN.
Eat shit SBR tax and reg.
Seriously though, if you are carrying revolvers matter only in lightweight small(er) frame .357 and handload or use quality .38.
Bears is serious doh.

>>34997771
The Russians made some gas-seal revolvers based on Nagants designs that could be suppressed. These were perfect for assassinations
>lower noise
>no brass
>conceals like any other handgun

Also revolvers don't jam as often as pistols

>>34997798

Yeah like I said just for the sake of big game hunting of course you COULD use a revolver but that is just a personal preference kind of thing when a rifle would fair better , but that is it.

I mean you could carry a light frame 38 but something like a glock 26 would be so much better self defense wise.

>>34997815

Yeah no one else made revolvers like that because they were still piss poor regardless of being able to be supressed, it serves no useful purpose unless it is your only gun. it also would conceal worse than modern semi autos.

And your last bit confirms nogunz because a well maintained quality semi auto will jam about as often as your S&W that is in good condition, whereas you taurus could easily fuck itself and be unable to fire or turn the cylinder because the release is fucked.

File: 002w9863.jpg (79KB, 695x489px) Image search: [Google]

79KB, 695x489px

>>34997798
>YES, I SAID BIPOD IN CONJUCTION WITH HANDGUN

Calm yo tits.

Oh good it's this thread again. It's totally useful and not someone with revolver shame.

Did a revolver touch you OP? Or perhaps did it touch the X ring a bunch and you came home and made this thread.

>>34997831
>whereas you taurus could easily fuck itself and be unable to fire or turn the cylinder because the release is fucked

No one worth their salt considers what Taurus makes a gun. Just like the orcs that make them, they have no souls and are not legitimate. Just like Jennings, Bryce, Jimenez, or Ruger. They look like a revolver but have some major flaw.

>>34997999
>or Ruger
was about to get a gp100

should I not??

>>34998035
Ruger's fine, ignore him.

>>34997771
Professional killers usually leave the gun at the crime scene.

>>34997771
>So that is it...
>Filename clearly taken straight from an article
Did you try to respond to someone and accidentally make a thread?
>weapon platform
JFC.

Do you have any personal experience with revolvers?

>>34997815
>revolvers don't jam as often as pistols
Fuddlore.

>>34998067
Got proof for that claim? Seems like an unnecessary risk.

File: 1503036306703.png (15KB, 634x155px) Image search: [Google]

15KB, 634x155px

>>34997771
>revolvers lose to semi autos as far as a weapon platform goes in pretty much every conceivable way

Is it useful to compare the platforms for any reason other than autism? Don't answer right away, you might be autistic. For instance, citizens who practice with and keep a revolver for self defese, I would wager 99% of them never find themselves in circumstances which a semi auto would have served them better.

It might be a more useful comparison to look at what applications semi autos and revolvers perform well at. Revolvers are extremely accurate, reliable, powerful, and can be shot quickly. There are many applications which can be fulfilled well by the use of revolvers despite modern semi-auto alternatives. However I suspect this is just a bait thread. 4/10 I replied at length.

>>34997831
<last bit confirmes noguns
They dont jam, and most of the "tap rack bang" problems you are prone to get in a semi is just anothet squeeze of the trigger to fix.
Obviously all guns are prone to critical failiures but thats mostly it for wheelgats.

You cant rely entirely on nutnfancy for your intel my dude.

File: 1501803262266.jpg (104KB, 987x674px) Image search: [Google]

104KB, 987x674px

>>34998067
>>34998075
No see what you do is you leave a completely unrelated gun at the scene so as to confuse 5-O

>>34998075
They use an untraceable weapon and leave it. Or promptly dispose of it. It's one less thing to get linked to the crime.

whats stronger a 357 magnum round or a 10mm

>>34998092
>most of the "tap rack bang" problems you are prone to get in a semi is just anothet squeeze of the trigger to fix
You don't get those problems in a revolver since there's no slide and no magazine. The issues you run into are things like poorly machined cartridges locking up the cylinder.

I'm with that other dude, you're noguns.

File: Yo proof.png (90KB, 500x427px) Image search: [Google]

90KB, 500x427px

>>34998102
Most firearms in the US are untraceable Anon, that ain't saying much. However, if at any point in the future that firearm is somehow linked to you you're fucked which is why I don't see why professional killers would usually leave the gun at the crime scene.

>>34998061
Rugers are cast. This is far from fine.

>>34997771
So?

>>34998075
>>revolvers don't jam as often as pistols
>Fuddlore.
I only own revolvers and I've put thousand of rounds through them. They've never jammed because it's impossible without an integral mechanical failure.

File: Manurhin_MR-88_Stainless_4inch.jpg (94KB, 1100x650px) Image search: [Google]

94KB, 1100x650px

>>34998475
>it's impossible without an integral mechanical failure
That's not true, all sorts of things can go wrong with the ammo and cause the cylinder to lock up, to include cheapass practice ammo fouling up the gun over time if you don't clean it.

The reason they haven't failed is because it's unlikely for any decent firearm to fail.

>>34998459
>Rugers are cast
And cast well enough that they often have their own sections in reloading manuals because they're quite strong.

File: 1487651979156.jpg (46KB, 976x510px) Image search: [Google]

46KB, 976x510px

>>34998526
Odd that Manurhin's MR73 uses a Smith-style cylinder release, while this MR88 uses a Ruger-style release.

>>34998609
That's because the MR88 actually uses a Ruger frame.

File: 20170702_145928.jpg (4MB, 4032x3024px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 4032x3024px

>>34998129
Im not even the first dude.
I'm saying ammunition related failiures (the most common failiure) is catastrophic for a semi whereas you just turn the swiss clockwork one more time on a wheelgat. (No taprackbang involved)

Also <noguns is not a good insult if the recipient has guns

>>34998662
Does Manurhin not manufacture their own frames?

>>34998143
>However, if at any point in the future that firearm is somehow linked to you you're fucked which is why I don't see why professional killers would usually leave the gun at the crime scene.

You literally explained it to yourself. So in the future you can't get linked to it.

>>34998690
>Handing evidence over to the police is a good way to make sure said evidence never comes back to bite you in the ass
I don't know about that. I'm still waiting on a source for that claim by the way.

>>34998112
.357 by a significant amount.
People who say 10mm can get close to .357 are comparing +p+ 10mm to low loaded .357

>>34998711
Godfather. Why he tells Michael multiple times to drop the revolver. As well as "leave the gun, grab the canolis". It's just common practice.
>proofs
Most hitmen don't right tutorials. How is leaving an unregistered weapon with no prints provide anything to the cops?

Hunting

>>34998685
AFAIK they do but I really don't know.

>>34998664
>ammunition related failiures (the most common failiure) is catastrophic for a semi
Didn't sound like it, especially since you brought up TRB which is a quick and easy way to clear most jams. If something can be fixed that easily it's not catastrophic. The only thing that pulling the trigger twice on a revolver gets around is a dud round and that could just end up boning you if the round goes off when it's not aligned with the barrel. Get your cylinder locked up and things can get complicated.

>>34998730
This guy gets it.
Also hot 357 from a 20inch barrel is touching on low 30-30.
Man i want me a levergat.

>>34998733
>Godfather.
This had better be Poe's law at work.
>How is leaving an unregistered weapon with no prints provide anything to the cops?
Let's look at the other side of that coin, what message does leaving the gun deliver if nobody knows it was your gun?

>>34998775
I'll take ballistics for $500 Alex.

>>34997771
>every conceivable way
How so? A .357 with a 4-5in bbl is proven man slayer. Not even debatable. Your average 9mm might take 5 rds or more to end the fight. Most PDs empty their guns and reload to kill one BG. The manual of arms is vastly easier to learn on revolver. Much lower maintenance. Never had a ftf on a wheel gun. Never had a magazine problem in wheel gun. How many zombies do you intend to shoot? IRL, not COD, real gun fights almost always obey the rule of three - 3 shots, from 3 yards or less, over in 3 seconds or less. Proof me wrong.

>>34998787
What about ballistics? You don't need a gun lying around to know that dudes got shot.

>>34998813
The ballistic can link gun to the brass. So pick up and destroy the primer, leave the gun, or destroy the gun. Doing a life sentence isn't worth nickel and diming to save a $500 weapon.

>>34998747
If you are worrying about out of battery detonation on a revolver ftf, why arent you mentioning the equally significant detonation of polymer pistol frames?

Also
>worrying about out of battery detonation in a self defence scenario
>not worrying more about imminent permanent darkness

File: Beretta catastrophic failure.jpg (273KB, 1024x768px) Image search: [Google]

273KB, 1024x768px

>>34998832
>If you're worried about one thing why aren't you mentioning a dissimilar thing?
Also I think it's odd that you specifically stated polymer frames, it's not like metal frames can't fuck up too. Not to mention you seem to be trying to move this from an abstract discussion. This isn't about what I'm more worried about, this is about things that can happen.

>>34998924
What the fuck happened here?

>>34997771
>But for the sake of everything else revolvers lose to semi autos as far as a weapon platform goes in pretty much every conceivable way
Simplicity of use. There is no slide, there is no safety, and there are no frills. You just unholster the revolver and point it at your target then pull the trigger. Reloading is really where revolvers fall short because they require much more training for being quickly reloaded under stress.

>>34998825
>The ballistic can link gun to the brass.
Not really. Bullet analysis is more common and even then the most you get out of that is a rating of likelihood from high to low.
>save a $500 weapon
Go ahead and point out where I said you should keep the murder weapon.

>>34998924
Story? I have seriously seen hundreds of berrettas with 10s of thousands of rounds through them, and I have never even heard of this. Mostly broken locking locking blocks but never this sort of KB.

>>34998945
>>34998962
Reloads were too hot.

Hammerhead snubnose wheeleguns are also the most retard proof handguns in existence and are as such good choices for women and other mentally deficient individuals.

>>34998955
Then why are you even arguing about it? If you're not keeping it, just leave the damn thing, without prints of course.

>>34998733
>As well as "leave the gun, grab the canolis"
That line was completely improvised. It was also fucking perfect.

>>34998993
>Then why are you even arguing about it?
A: Because you never backed up your claim and all of this nonsense is the result of you attempting to do so.
B: Because it's retarded to hand evidence over to the police instead of destroying it.

>>34999012
>attempting to do so.
*attempting to avoid doing so

>>34999012
It's not evidence if it proves nothing. I told you already there isn't going to be any proof, ever. Unless you're a homicide detective, which I know you're not because you're a dumbass.

>>34998075
>Fuddlore

A bobbed revolver can fire from pockrts, with the barrel pressed against something or someone. Most semis will go out of battery and malfunction

>>34999027
>It's not evidence if it proves nothing.
Fine, potential evidence if you're going to be a stickler about it.
>I told you already there isn't going to be any proof, ever.
So your claim about what most professional killers do was a complete asspull because you have no way of knowing what most professional killers do? Ironic that you're calling anyone a dumbass.

>>34999057
I'm a professional killer. I just can't prove it, it would risk my anonymity.

File: 1495739147307.jpg (58KB, 750x727px) Image search: [Google]

58KB, 750x727px

>>34999069
Knew it, Poe's law is at work here and I've been taken for a ruse cruise.

>>34998974
I have to wonder if the a1 would have handled it

>>34999040
>But if you take into account this ridiculously specific scenario where a semi-auto would actually still be fine revolvers look a little better

>>34998526
>And cast well enough that they often have their own sections in reloading manuals because they're quite strong.

Let me put it this way. Just because a Nigger is capable of working for you doesn't mean you want one.

It's design is inherantly flawed and they make up for it by making them fuck huge.

>>34998459
Better stay off of airplanes, apparently anon hasn't told engine manufacturers how inherently wrong it is to cast life-limited rotating parts like turbine blades yet.

Don't know how Rolls and GE could have missed it.

>>34999243
The GP100 and 686 both have similar overall lengths and weights assuming the same barrel length. At that point you're just looking at width and considering that the GP100 can fit into holsters marked for the S&W 586/686 I can't help but think that you're full of crap.

>>34999339
GE doesn't use the same technique or vetting that Ruger uses. The airline industry is pregnant with controls and requirements to keep things safe. Ruger is not.

>>34999341
Whatever you say, Bill. If they're good enough for you, have at them. They're not good enough for me.

>>34999508
>Passive-aggressive insults instead of substantive points
So yeah you're full of crap. Maybe next time you pull something out of your ass make sure it's not something that people can fact check.

>>34999508
Thank you for conceding that "cast = bad" is reductive and wrong.

>>34999547
You're dumb if you think that aerospace casting is anywhere close to gun casting.

>>34999560
Not all casting is the same. Ruger casting is miles from airline casting. Ruger casting is shit compared to quality forged and machined components.

>>34999547
>Maybe next time you pull something out of your ass make sure it's not something that people can fact check.

What the fuck did he pull out of his ass? There are tons of ways to cast things. They're vastly different in result. Even just what kind of material is cast has a huge affect on the end product. There is no fucking way Ruger goes to the same rigorous standards that are required in flight industries. You're going to have to post some goddamn proofs if you're claiming that.

File: yer post is fucking gay as niggers.gif (2MB, 360x240px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 360x240px

>>34997771
>revolvers lose to semi autos as far as a weapon platform goes in pretty much every conceivable way

High capacity revolvers exist you neanderthal
https://www.smith-wesson.com/firearms/performance-center-model-mp-r8
Suppressible revolvers exist you dirty negro
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nagant_M1895
Automatic revolvers exist you inbred pigfucker
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Automatic_revolver

>>35000329
You're dumb if you think that's what this is about.

>>35000371
>What the fuck did he pull out of his ass?
see>>34999243
>making them fuck huge

Y'all need to learn to read reply strings.

File: Mosin-Nagant_M1891.jpg (585KB, 2450x900px) Image search: [Google]

585KB, 2450x900px

Wow some Anon in here is ultra butthurt at Ruger.

Show me where Bill sporterized your milsurp Anon.

>>34997771
It's almost as if a weapons platform in common use nearly 60 years before the other was conceived of is less advanced in technology and design.

>>34998067
>not melting the gun with thermite and leaving it at the scene
It's like you want the gun to be identifiable to the police.

>>34997771
Revolvers for defensive use are like 1911s, outdated but not obsolete.

>>34998067
>Professional killers usually leave the gun at the crime scene.
Thats what niggers do.
They also think scraping the serial will get them outta trouble.
No, a pro would have a really expensive gun that works well and keep it.
Along with picking up shell casings left behind.
And using bullets that can fragment so the cops cannot find out what shoot the victim.
>No gun and no bullet?
>hard to make a case with no crime scene weapon.

>>35000348
Ruger has steel cast which is incredibly good

>>34998757
Got any data for that? I love my .357 levers but to think that it's potentially 30-30 tier is a stretch of my imagination.

>>34998143
How would it be linked? A simple pair of gloves will prevent that. On the other hand, not having the firearm on you after the deed is done if you are stopped and frisked a few blocks away will keep you in the clear.

I don't you think you grasp how difficult it is to actually link someone to a murder when the victim and perpetrator have no personal connection/history. It's nearly impossible without a major break like a confidential informant or snitch, especially if it is just a one time/no pattern thing.

>>34998067
Professionals don't use guns.

>>34998035
Mins is excellent and I suspect it'll last generations

>>34998990
Why is a hammerless snub more retard proof than a regular revolver

>>35002356
>How would it be linked?
Good question, and one that can be rendered moot by throwing the murder weapon in the ocean instead of almost literally handing it to the cops.

>>35000895
That is quite literally what it's about.

>>35000952
Cast M1a receivers.

>>35001675
The gun is left at the scene so the cops can't catch you with it. They have the murder weapon so they can't link it to other murders and you burn your clothes so they can't match GSR.

>>35001919
Said the anon who posted no proof whatsoever.

>>35000456
this

>>35003380
>Still can't read reply strings

>>35003604
God youre dumb.

>>35003625
>I'm apparently borderline illiterate but you're the dumb one
Like I said, read the reply string. Nowhere did I mention aerospace anything.

>>35003652
I did you fuck stick.

>>35003756
>I did
Yes, to me, in a reply that had nothing to do with what I'd been saying because you didn't read the reply string. That's why we're where we're at now.

>>34997771
I don't have to rack a slide or switch off a safety with my GP100

>>34997967

If you needed a semi-decent assassination weapon, and didn't want a .22lr Jamal, why wouldn't you use something like this?

>fits in any backpack
>Most coat pockets
>handgun caliber, so no one is out there looking for snipers on the rooftops
>can make relatively easy shots at 100 with anything that's not fuddy five, 200 with specialty hunting calibers
>still a handgun if you need it to defend yourself from retaliation/cops if you're a shitty assassin

Also, unrelated
Whats up with the cardboard? He can't load the bipod like that, so isn't it pretty much useless?

>>35004722

>I'm going to go play new vegas now.

File: JUST.jpg (59KB, 661x496px) Image search: [Google]

59KB, 661x496px

>Ruger never released an 8 shot .327 magnum snubbie
>Revolvers will never get to be objectively better than any single stack 9, even in capacity
Feels bad man

I'm this anon
>>34999339
>>34999560

Some of you people are dangerously retarded.

>Casting is bad
Cast parts keep your plane in the air
>Ruger's casting process is bad and the parts aren't as good as airplane cast parts
Great, you should have said that - or at least read the replies and responded to them.

sage because fucking retarded discussion with retards.

>>35006517
>Cast parts keep your plane in the air

Jesus fucking Christ. Everyone has acknowledged there is a difference between Ruger casting and aerospace casting.

Ruger uses the same method as lawnmower engine blocks, which are not precision parts.