Does round nose FMJ ammo have any positives at all?

>>34949269
Penetration.
(More) Reliable feeding
Cheaper than HP or other boutique cartridge types.

>>34949269

Exit wounds cause tons of trauma and blood loss.

>>34949270
Generally slightly better ballistics as well, but the difference is generally so small it's not really worth mentioning.

it's not illegal for use in war

>>34949275
Would it have better aerodynamics?

>>34949269
More comfortable anal penetration.

>>34949310
I mean, it really depends on what you're comparing it to, but generally speaking yes.

>>34949269
They killed a lot of people before internet happened and armchair operators made anything under a JHP 9mm +P+ literally incapable of harming living things.

protip: FMJ will continue to kill for a very long time, friend.

File: d21902fcf2503074b7c71f2c9ecdd99b.jpg (146KB, 871x651px) Image search: [Google]

146KB, 871x651px

>>34949269

It's clearly the most a e s t h e t I c

Also ball ammo out of a rifle produces a ton of internal damage and has horrendous exit wounds

>>34949311
at handgun calibers you might just as well use the other end first

>>34949434
So how much farther would say, +P FMJ be effective than +P HP or even JHP?

>>34949278
All is fair in war.