An artillery barrage of questions

>>34923005
The idea of a trench, or a foxhole even, is a good concept when getting shelled. The only difference is now days weapons are pinpoint accurate.

>>34923005
>The hits seem almost directly on top of the trenches.IS there even hope for infantry who come under fire from artillery.What should they do, hunkerdown and pray or run like shit down a leg and hope they escape the blast radius in time.
they've already fucked up, you shouldn't let the enemy know what or where to use mortars/arty. guerrilla warfare 101, keep moving.

File: 1468202980830.png (134KB, 271x264px) Image search: [Google]

134KB, 271x264px

>>34923092
Thats not reassuring freindo.

So whats the point if you spend an hour or so digging in if your just going to get 'pinpoint' artty brought down on you.The only hope you have is that the spotters call it wrong ir that your dealing with shit teir soviet block guns lobbing lead at you.

>>34923100
Those are SAA vs. FSA forces both have a symmetric forces approach considering the FSA has a few defected SAA army units, so they may not be pulling guerrilla warfare card.

>>34923196
Well in Afghanistan we dug fighting holes (foxholes) all the time, even slept in them. The difference is I'm an American. Hadjis aren't pinpoint accurate, or accurate in general really, so it benefits us.

Granted because they don't have satellites that could count the whiskers on your face, and we do.