how to solve this problem

>>34911590
Mentally change people to accept polygamy as a morally positive choice.

Yes, as any high school teacher could have told you, interspersing girls among the boys makes things calm down. It's when the immature shitstains get to clump together that you get trouble. Another thing you could try is to get sensible adults for your armed forces instead of sheltered manchilds.

>>34911590
Without medical intervention (drugs, hormones) no. It is embedded in our genetic code. Give a man a gun around women and he's going to compete with other men for the women. Our ultimate goal as an organism is to reproduce as often and as with as many females as possible. Civilization tried to do away with invention of monogamy and religion but even still we look away from that and cheat, become agnostic/atheist and always revert to our primal behaviors.

>>34911636
>group of males
>focused on objective

>put women into group of males
>men lose focus of objective and start competing for female attention

Smart plan, buster.

>>34911590
>give women feminine dicks
All world problems solved

>>34911590
Patriarchal monogamy.

>>34911872
fag

>>34911590
>endlessly fighting against human nature
OP is western society in a nutshell

File: ANCAP.jpg (29KB, 542x600px) Image search: [Google]

29KB, 542x600px

>>34911590
NAP

>>34911663
thats why autism is so L33t

>>34911590
Genetic engineering to remove undesireable instincts. That or Bluetooth controlled brain/glandular implants. Detect an undesirable brain pattern/hormone production, such as ocytocin caused by the presence of a potential mate, shut it down. Conversely, too much pain due to bullet, produce more adrenalin/endorphins.

>>34914942
But who polices the cities?

>>34911604
There's literally not a single technologically advanced culture that's capable of accepting polygamy since it's a telltale sign of primitivism and barbarism.

>>34911663
Intersperse them with women during their free time ensuring no clumps: fighting over women of all things should be discouraged and so should having many, since it indicates that the man puts too much value in them and too little in their own self, and proper ways of marking an individual mate as being in a pair should be standardized. A group of men without them will get restless long term: knowing they've got someone to go to close by helps keep their mind on track, thus the rape of the Sabine women was vital to going from a gang of dudes getting antsy in the hills, to a proper civilization with a future. Women mean there's a future. Separating men and women during work for focus is still the right track though. This problem has been solved for a while now: the weapons are optional even.

Men fight over Women when they become scarce and they become scarce mostly when women are concentrated, but they only do that because the group is living like wolves in captivity with all the infighting for dominance that entails. Spread the group out more. Wolves in the wild don't have alphas. They live in families. Every man and women need their own domain. They still have dominance hierarchies but they're situational and not as simple as the leader follower dynamics of captives. It's interesting then that liberals live like captive wolves, in close proximity with a bunch of unrelated people in overpopulated cities, and call for strengthening the "dominance" of the state. They're beta on a level most don't understand.

Parallel force structures.

>>34911590
as in the words of Corporal Ray Person, 'All modern conflict is because of the lack of pussy'
or something like that

We're apes. All apes exhibit basically the same behaviors, however physiologically different we are.

Men are biologically driven to gain the attention of women. Women are biologically driven to gain the attention of men.

Such reproductive rituals are a major disadvantage to behold on a battlefield.