Is the Glock 17 too big?
For you.
For carry. That's why I bought a 34 for the range; in for a penny in for a pound.
>>34900370
>>34900370
It doesn't need to exist when the 34 exists.
>>34900384
Too big for carry too small for range?
>>34900370
No
>>34900376
Sorry you have a small dick
>>34900384
No, manlet... its not. Stop being little.
>>34900391
>Too big for carry too small for range?
Pretty much.
>>34900397
My Johnson already prints, how am I gonna look if my gun does too?
>>34900489
By johnson im sure you mean iver johnson... and youre right to not call it a gun.
>>34900370
For You.
I carry a glock 17 comfortably.
You can do it if you're not some faggot manlet.
>>34900489
>My cock already prints
Well how about you stop dressing like a fucking fag in tight pants then, eh?
Only for manlets or people with delicate girl hands.
Reminder that a 17 with grip shortened to 19 length is the ideal ccw
>>34900370
Bitch please.
>>34900370
Needlessly large for carry. Outshadowed by the 34 for range/competition. It really is pointless.
>>34900390
but the 17 existed first...
>>34900390
>>34900384
>34
>Not a 35 converted to 9mm for even less recoil
Pleb desu
>>34902887
For duty use it's superior, the glock 19 doesn't have enough rail space for some lights. Sorry to shit on your parade. 19 for carry, 17 for military and police, 34 for competition. Either of them could work for the other role but they would incur some kind of disadvantage.
>>34900370
>using glock products other than maybe the 26 after the advent of the PPQ
SHIGGY
>>34902919
Seems like a lot of needless work for a minor change only weak twisted manlets would even notice
>>34902241
Stop buying into stupid memes you shithead, the extra barrel length/ sight radius makes no difference whatsoever.
t. shot a 17 and a 19 back to back
>>34902985
It's mostly for competition so I can shoot major/minor power factor.
>>34900370
For 9mm, yes.
>>34902993
>can't tell the difference
Go shoot more, kid.
Best full size Glock is 21SF 45ACP.
Why doesn't Glock hurry up and make a reliable 22lr?
>>34902985
>A lot of needless work
A $110 barrel swap is needless work? I mean if you want to get 100% reliable you can do the extractor/ejector swap also but that's unnecessary for plinking.
>>34903218
Lol if you want it to be reliable you have to put in work but who needs that?
If you need less recoil from a glock 34 to be competitive your a ladyboy who should stick to 22
The 17 is a fine carry gun. We cut down the grip on the 17 so it can accept a 19 mag if needed. The 19 makes for a nice back up.
>>34901885
If your dick doesn't print in sweatpants, do you even have one or at that point is it just an inflamed clit?