Why does every semi automatic ~9mm pistol look the same
>>34871657
I loved The Bouncer.
>>34871657
Form follows function.
By having the magazine in the grip, it is possible to have a reasonable barrel length without increasing overall length.
Trigger operated by forefinger allows thumb and other fingers to maintain grip on weapon and keep it pointed at target.
Etc.
>>34871657
I loved that game. Brings back good memories. Also what he
>>34871926
said
>>34871657
Because you don't know enough about them to be able to notice the differences?
>>34871926
This is why revolvers were btfo
>>34871926
I want something that looks like a cool .22 pistol but shoots bigger rounds
But everyfuckin one looks like a glock or some shit
>>34872086
Because the design works and works well
>>34872136
Eff you
Glock 28????
>>34872086
> tfw no ruger mk 3 or 4 in 9mm/45 acp
I know it isn't possible because of the size of the mk series, but think of all the big bux ruger could make if it was done.
Hey, if they made the mini 14 in 7.62x39 slav rounds, then they should do this for their next innovation.
>>34872195
buy me a glock
>>34872195
>if they made the mini 14 in 7.62x39
but they have
>>34871657
Because you're too nogunz to see the differences.
Oh I don't know, nothing to do with biomechanics or the basic function of the firearm I'm sure
>>34872086
So buy a luger, a C96, bergman-Bayard, automag, or an old high standard .380
>>34873123
That's what he said
>>34872195
They could do it, but it would be heavy. Most of the Ultramatic is bolt but the idea is sound, and if AMT and Wildey could pull off magnums a 9mm is possible. Just pretty close to pointless