Any CZ Brno Mod. 2/452/455 owners here? Definetely one of

>>34857659
I've owned a few, get a 452.

>>34857659
I've got the 455. It is wonderful.

>>34857668
Got a 452, I've won many competitions with it.

>>34857659
Got the full stock 455
Would recommend, CZ doesn't skimp on the wood.

File: P2050117.jpg (514KB, 1280x960px) Image search: [Google]

514KB, 1280x960px

First rifle I ever bought. They're great and fun to shoot, with .22lr I like bolt actions and single shots for that ultra relaxed plinking experience.

File: IMG_20170518_123801.jpg (1MB, 3264x1836px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 3264x1836px

>>34857659
I have a 455 and a 557.

They're both pretty great, as far as modern bolt actions under a grand go.

>>34857708
>techsights
nice

File: 2016-01-10_boltwood.jpg (853KB, 1920x946px) Image search: [Google]

853KB, 1920x946px

I'm going to be a contrarian and say I don't like my CZ452FS. I'm probably going to get rid of it.

I bought into the CZ hype a while back and came back disillusioned:
- The wood is super light and dents easy.
- Receiver shows wear from dragging the bolt handle against it for no reason whatsoever.
- The gun doesn't feed properly from 2 kinds of mags unless you run it pretty hard.
- Accuracy is acceptable, but mediocre.

If you want cheaper than cheap, I'd suggest Savage MkII. Looks less refined, but seems a better choice overall.
But other than that, I'd just suggest looking in the second hand market for a used Anschutz or something similar. Those things are tanks and don't wear easily, yet tend to be quite prominent on the second hand market if you look around.

>>34857755
Yeah, love the shit out of some good iron sights.