Well, what is it?

probably a white or a green

>>34854373
No finger grooves gen 5 would be the perfect handgun to me. Day 1 buy.

>>34854373
Some shit I still won't buy.

>>34854402
This

Finger-grooveless and pre-tapped for rmr sight.

>>34854373
if it's not in 7.62 tok I could give a shit

It wasn't made by glock USA

>>34854373
>polymer framed handgun in a common calibre but in combination with a frame and barrel size they haven't previously offered, with polygonal rifling, front slide serrations, and finger grooves.

Just my guess

>>34854373
Marsellus Wallaces brief case

Glock is doing lootboxes, fucking p2w bullshit

>>34854373
Its probably a tactical/practical 10mm

>>34854445
>front slide serrations

Fuck off with that homo shit

File: b72.jpg (19KB, 680x495px) Image search: [Google]

19KB, 680x495px

>>34854373
>Point Blank

>>34854464
They already have the g20/g29.

>>34854402
this. i hate the finger grooves so i bought a p320. now im (you)ing myself for that.

either what you said or the military trial glock. would buy asap.

>>34854469
front slide serrations are dope as hell

>>34854481

But no 10mm equivalent of the g34

File: IMG_1836.jpg (2MB, 3958x2666px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3958x2666px

>>34854481
And 40

>>34854483
Oh.. I could see it being the military one

maybe a glock with a fully supported chamber.

>>34854502
G40. Where have you been?

File: tumblr_osou8zMK0D1vuv9buo1_1280.jpg (229KB, 1280x960px) Image search: [Google]

229KB, 1280x960px

>>34854373
Front serrations standard across all guns forever. Fuck you tactifags for ruining handgun aesetic forever

.38 Super? 7.62 Tok like >>34854440 said? .357? .41? .44? I dunno.

Actually, now that I think about it, they don't have a .22LR offering, do they? It might be that.

>>34854373
Hopefully it will have a manual safety and have actual double action/single action capabilities then maybe I will buy a glock then.

>>34854486
>muh presschecks so I can tactically check my chamber like my favorite POG YouTube instructors
No they look like worse ass than billboard logos and have no functional purpose that couldn't be used with the rear serrations or just pinching the front part.

>>34854522

g40 is closer in dimensions to a 17L, not a 34

I GOT IT

10MM GAP

>>34854518
Not physically possible for any auto pistol. There are only degrees of more or less support.

>>34854567
>the same people who made Glocks and ARs popular and killed all innovation in the firearm market.

>>34854546
>da/sa AND manual safety

What the fuck why?

File: bf65effb331cce0e629bafb514e50b72.jpg (460KB, 1999x1369px) Image search: [Google]

460KB, 1999x1369px

If they were to go full retard -
An AR 15.

>>34854706
I'm ambivilant towards glocks but I share the sentiment. Absolutely disgusting and pointless.

>>34854422
/thread

>>34854373
nothing new whatsoever

>>34854534
there's some .22 conversion slides out there at stupidly expensive prices $300 on up.

>>34854724
>HK USP
>Taurus PT92
>>34854725
>AR-15 with a polymer lower AND upper for extra face shrapnel

I bet it's gonna be a glock that looks, feels and functions like every other glock

File: Px4Compact_3QT_R_BK.jpg (38KB, 600x600px) Image search: [Google]

38KB, 600x600px

>>34854676
Not if your barrel rotates.

RTF2 without the Snickers Tactical package.

>>34854373
Probably a Gen 5 or the 17M/19M

>>34854567
You can't make a glock look worse, so just add them

>>34854839
I love my .45. 10/10 would shoot all day

>>34854749
Oh I agree with you. I'm saying its because of these youtubers that these fads are taking place.

>>34854706
That's because there's nothing you can change to improve upon these glocks beyond aesthetic and ergonomic considerations, which are already subjective. This is why other companies like walther, hk, s&w, sig, cz, etc. are moving away from their legacy designs and trying to make minor variations on the glock formula. Until and unless ammunition improves significantly, there won't be any more efficiency gained by moving away from the glock paradigm.

>>34854928
Making a model without fucking polymer would probably be a good start.

>>34854567
Someone's a Fudd

>>34854886
Glocks are the best looking striker guns except for the gen 1 p99, so they should stay off or they'd risk looking like an XD or ppq.

the same shit as always
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3d957TracBI

>>34854945
That's the opposite of innovative. Metal guns are heavier for no real benefit beyond target shooting, which is why everyone moved away from them.

The Glock everyone wants (no fingergrooves, etc.) but chambered in .45 GAP.

>>34854945

Polymer reduces weight and makes manufacturing easier and cheaper. Weight and cost are what both manufacturers and end users care about

A single stack glock in .40
A 1911 glock
A civilian version of the MHS, 19 frame, 17 slide, with safety
An original idea.

>>34855243
>An original idea

This thread is about what it could be, not what it won't be.

>>34854459
I'll take a factory painted Glock | Weasel

it is either a .22lr trainer model or a single stack compact 40sw

File: 1494951721036.jpg (35KB, 640x621px) Image search: [Google]

35KB, 640x621px

>>34855243
>>34855269
Since other manufacturers only clone glocks nowadays, doesn't that mean glock is the most innovative?

>>34854373
Man, loot boxes are always disapointing, I keep getting sprays and voice lines instead gun or costume skins.

>>34855339
No, because Glock doesn't bring anything new. At least the other manufacturers give their guns a gimmick of some kind.

>>34855339
They're only Glock clones if you consider every polymer frame striker fired handgun to be a Glock clone. The actual designs are significantly different.

>>34854968
thats like being the tallest midget

File: 1466690128224.png (411KB, 500x503px) Image search: [Google]

411KB, 500x503px

>>34854968

File: Glock 19M.jpg (69KB, 750x528px) Image search: [Google]

69KB, 750x528px

It's going to be this. Screen cap this. And I will buy this fuck out of it. Small chance it could be the MHS version which would fucking suck. I don't like safeties, glocks don't need safeties. Especially the ugly 17 frame with 19 slide, like WTF why would you ever do that???

File: 1499125826146.jpg (26KB, 413x367px) Image search: [Google]

26KB, 413x367px

>it's already exploding

>>34854524

Front serrations only exist because Glock kept suing people because their Trademark actually includes the rear serrations with a square slide.

Front serrations are fucking stupid.

File: 1501379776973.png (61KB, 261x212px) Image search: [Google]

61KB, 261x212px

>>34855529

>>34854578
The g34 was only created for idpa boxes so I don't know why they would continue with that size for any other purpose

Gen 5.

RTF Frame without finger groves.
Double recoil spring
Cut for rmr
Front slide serrations
Factory night sights

File: 1499115427087.jpg (12KB, 250x250px) Image search: [Google]

12KB, 250x250px

>>34855588

File: the superior austrian striker.jpg (88KB, 855x694px) Image search: [Google]

88KB, 855x694px

>>34854968
*cough*

File: neato.jpg (21KB, 427x427px) Image search: [Google]

21KB, 427x427px

>>34855529

>>34855608
Steyr m9s are just fat mutilated glocks.

File: 1499470932968.png (264KB, 864x722px) Image search: [Google]

264KB, 864x722px

>>34855529

>>34855466
Such as?

>>34854373

A season-exclusive Glock model with an extra gimmick or two.

>>34855799
Are you serious?

>>34855021
Until you are actually in a firefight in which case the weight of the steel frame makes it feel like a Cadillac compared to a fucking pogo stick.

Plastic frame fags just want a reason to justify their use of 9mm. Not that 9mm is bad but 9mm in a full size steel frame pistol is better shooting and a much more sound option in the long run.

That 1911, except polymer, striker fired, and with bad sights, a 10lb trigger, and a wrong grip angle. Or they could finally be releasing the Glock 19L, the compact successor to the beloved 17L.

>>34854373
Glock stepped up from hand grenades to briefcase nukes huh?

>>34856090
top kek

File: killary.webm (686KB, 570x814px) Image search: [Google]

686KB, 570x814px

>>34854373
We have had our expert team of computer image analyzers deconstruct the data to display contents, you may need to brace yourselves for what we found...

>>34854373
Gen 5 Hi-point C9 clone with a factory night glowsights, aggressive finger groves worse warranty, single stack.

It's a ploy. Since all manufacturers will respond with their own dumb single stacks, Glock can coast on existing contracts while the polymer market follows the Gen 5 to its grave.

THEN glock reveals its Gen 6 unopposed.

>>34856335
this goof had potential. then you killed it.

File: Political-pictures-do-not-want-surprised-guy.jpg (18KB, 500x330px) Image search: [Google]

18KB, 500x330px

>>34856335

File: 1465784227641.jpg (14KB, 399x295px) Image search: [Google]

14KB, 399x295px

>>34856375
I thought it was pretty good

>>34856335
>MFW

>>34854373
It's going to be something dumb like a 42c or 43c

>>34856335
Finally, a Glock for snowflakes and antifa!

File: seen john.webm (681KB, 648x808px) Image search: [Google]

681KB, 648x808px

>>34856375

File: IMG_2643.jpg (48KB, 540x540px) Image search: [Google]

48KB, 540x540px

>>34856335

>>34855785
ur a tard

File: 1502050908883.png (91KB, 500x389px) Image search: [Google]

91KB, 500x389px

>>34855529

File: 1449319340945-1.png (282KB, 530x354px) Image search: [Google]

282KB, 530x354px

>>34856440
BA DA-DA-DAAAAAA

>/k/ needs webm's with sound

>>34854373
probably shit

>>34854373
A double stack, single action only glock with a frame mounted safety directly under your dominant hand that clicks down flush into a groove to gurantee it won't get bumped on by accident. Compatible with standard glock mags in the same caliber. Match style adjustable sights from the factory. Above average trigger pull on par with 800-900 dollar 1911's all at a price point of 650 dollars.

File: 1502245646277.jpg (30KB, 292x257px) Image search: [Google]

30KB, 292x257px

>>34856440

File: image.jpg (166KB, 720x960px) Image search: [Google]

166KB, 720x960px

>>34854402
This

>>34856440
mmm much better

File: IMG_0190.jpg (25KB, 491x713px) Image search: [Google]

25KB, 491x713px

>>34855529

File: fagger_niggot.webm (652KB, 584x810px) Image search: [Google]

652KB, 584x810px

>>34856572

>>34856490
I laughed way too hard at this.

>>34855529
>R A T E D

>>34856613
Not dickbutt?

File: proxy.php.jpg (176KB, 1242x1656px) Image search: [Google]

176KB, 1242x1656px

It's the Gen 5, probably a G17, G19 or both. There's a guy on Glocktalk who preordered a G17 Gen 5 through a Blue Label dealer.

https://www.glocktalk.com/threads/gen-5-on-pre-order.1671974/

According to some random dude in that thread, the changes are:

>A new tougher finish
>Changes in the rifling
>Longer recoil spring assembly
>Reinforced forward notch for the recoil spring assembly
>A smoother trigger similar to the G42/43
>Flared magwell
>No finger grooved
>Changes in the safety plunger
>Ambidextrous slide release
>Magazines have an extended front lip
>Magazine well cutout

>>34854440
Fucking this!!

>>34854373

Gen 5

No finger grooves is the only reason I'll be buying a new 19. Just can't shoot compact Glocks good due to them while full size and subcompacts are lasers..

>>34856713
So basically all the crap that people pay to modify on their glocks already?

What's wrong with finger grooves? Unless you have manlet hands, sausage or bony fingers they're not a problem desu

>>34856773
I don't know what that means. I've never modified a Glock.

>>34856713
No changes to that god awful hump I see

>>34856779
Because /k/ needs to find a reason to bitch about something, even if its honestly a non issue.

File: que-1235833042.jpg (29KB, 320x214px) Image search: [Google]

29KB, 320x214px

What if it's a metal-lower G17?

>>34855243

>All this hype
>Huge Glock unveiling
>The new Glock 44
>Subcompact single stack .40S&W
>Dozens of excited Glock owners

>>34856779
Finger grooves only ever tend to fit about 70% of people well. I don't mind the finger grooves on Glocks, but HK P30 and VP finger grooves are pushing it for me, and Smith and Wesson revolver finger grooves aren't grippable to me at all without putting a finger on one of the ridges. I also immediately remove the A2 pistol grip from a new AR-15 because it puts my ring finger right on the ridge.

Then again, I have pretty thin fingers. I imagine that anybody with thicker (more normally sized) fingers would find the Glock finger grooves too small to grip comfortably.

>>34856809
I would actually be interested in one of these, especially if they were able to fit 6 rounds in the magazine, and especially if they increased the grip length and/or circumference compared to the diminutive grip of the G43.

>>34856811
I have normal size fingers but large hands. Smith and Wesson finger grooves and Glock finger grooves fit me like they were custom made.

However like you A2 pistol grips really cramp my middle finger.

>>34856787
>"I get my opinions about guns from other people" :^)

>>34856811
>I also immediately remove the A2 pistol grip from a new AR-15 because it puts my ring finger right on the ridge.

The A2 grip on the AR, is a gigantic bag of dicks.

>>34856844
From personal experience, actually.

Hopefully a .25 or .32. Would make my eclectic self happy.

>>34856830
S&W M&P Shield 40

>>34857176
I've tried one and didn't like it. The recoil coupled with the slippery grip made it frequently come up out of my hands while shooting. I'm hoping a Glock would have better recoil management and better grip texture without having to go Talon tape.

>>34856830
Glock 36

>>34857461
It's on the list of guns to buy, hopefully they will release a gen 4 or 5 version...

>>34857103
>glock's big reveal
>calibers that don't work
>one has less muzzle energy than .22lr
"hi, Gaston Glock here to tell you about the new glock. It's a fullsize pistol chambered in 6mm flobert, complete with an elevation adjustable rear sight that allows you to shoot at both 100 and 200 inches. Single stack mag."

>>34854388
Got a good chuckle from me, here's a (you)

>>34857547
Lost it at 100 and 200 inches.

development lead here

If anyone remembers the private indoor ranges we built for testing, we're finally releasing a carbine. Both will fold a-la kel-tecs sub-2000, one will be be a full 16 inch carbine, one will be a "pistol" with an integral wrist brace. Marketing people are shooting for going for 500-550 msrp

>>34857621
>Glock building a firearm that doesn't fit into the standard Glock box
I don't believe you.

>>34857621
make one that's ca/ct/ny legal and we'll appreciate it
>also proof or gtfo

Metal frame and single action capability.

I wonder if gun companies make announcements like this just so they can do market research by reading all the message boards and so forth?

>>34855529
>>34854373
It will be the Glock 50, in .50 AE (Area of Effect), since bigger caliber=bigger explosion.

>>34857621
>marketing determines MSRP
lmao, try harder

>>34855297
I'd rather have a Wasteland Rebel

>>34857740
I'd buy it.

>>34855960
Even if you're a manlet or a woman, you don't need a metal frame to shoot 9mm quickly and comfortably. Same with .40 and .45 acp. .45 super, .460 Rowland, and 10mm, that would make sense though.

>>34856787
The hump is good. It makes the gun point naturally instead of low.

>>34856779
Because if you grip it slightly wrong, it's uncomfortable and harder to shoot well. Plus they look ugly.

>>34857621
I know you're just anon's dad and you work part time between glock and nintendo, but if that was seriously true, I'd buy like 3.

>>34854928
As much as I hate it. This is spot on.

>>34854928
Inb4 a hammer fired, single action only glock with a trigger so crisp with so little travel that 1911 users weep impotent tears of bottled rage, only to be further anally devastated when those selfsame SAO glocks use standard glock double stacks, BTFOing 1911 fudds are their manlet hands for all eternity.

>>34858107
pls no

File: 1501408183056.jpg (66KB, 419x249px) Image search: [Google]

66KB, 419x249px

>>34854945
The future is now old man.

>>34856713

If those are the changes, I have no interest. My fingers fit the finger grooves just fine and I've already cleaned up the trigger with the usual Ghost 3.5lb connector. Sounds like it'll be great for those getting a new Glock, but I see no reason to upgrade from a Gen 3 or 4 unless you hate the finger grooves (and if you do, why the fuck do you have a Glock and not another polymer wonder 9?).

Ambi slide release is pretty cool, though. Glocks really need one.

>>34855813
Exactly this. Glock wouldn't have a major product update be a tie-in with a random seller I've never heard of for a limited time. It'll be something like the 'summer special' in a weird color.

File: laughing caco.jpg (42KB, 466x486px) Image search: [Google]

42KB, 466x486px

>>34855529

File: 054.png (441KB, 600x600px) Image search: [Google]

441KB, 600x600px

Literally fucking nothing...
Probably some faggoty paint job or finish.

Or >>34856713 which pretty much is fucking nothing.

>>34854373
Maybe it's a carbine?

>>34854373
50 BMG Glock I'm calling it. Cap this post.

I like green Glocks.

>>34854373
38 special revolver with a safety. Also drop safe.

>>34854373
10mm subcompact

>>34854422
/thread

Civvie MHS?

>>34860335
foot gun?

>>34860335
Reminds me of that "ZIP 22" gun.

>>34859822
>>34860335
I would buy

>>34854373
Quadruple stack .357 sig

Glock SMG in 10mm
Like a Kriss Vector but less snowflakes

File: 1500504237642.jpg (109KB, 632x902px) Image search: [Google]

109KB, 632x902px

Hopefully something pre stippled and cut to shit so the tacticool™ faggots on armslist can save a step when they sell their Bubba masterpiece for more than retail

>>34854546
Double action is pointless on a glock

File: Fallout 4 gunsmithing.jpg (90KB, 714x960px) Image search: [Google]

90KB, 714x960px

Full size .25 ACP doublestack.

File: US Marshals.jpg (72KB, 960x940px) Image search: [Google]

72KB, 960x940px

>>34856809

I want one.

as would a lot of Police officers who carry G22s or G23s on duty

If Glock made a single stack .44magnum I would piss my pants with excitement and sell my 10mm immediately.

File: images (3).jpg (17KB, 512x288px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 512x288px

>>34854373
>Well, what is it?

>>34857429
Then u won't like whatever glock shits out, I shot home boys shield in .40 and was much Better then shorting a glock 23. Reason why shield .40 is soft recoil because heavy slide and heavy recoil spring.

Whatever glock comes out with in a single stack .40 will be worser then a g27

>>34867761
>complaining about recoil from a Glock
Now I've heard it all.

>>34854373
Looks like a loot box. Is it daily?

>>34855529
Jesus Christ

>>34865128
>G42: 380
>G43: 9mm
>G44: 44 Mag
>G45: 45 Winmag
>G46: 460 Mag
>G47: 7.62x39
>G48: 475 Wildey

I can dig it.

>>34867987
Glocks do literally nothing to dampen recoil...

>>34868336
Except they aren't chambered in anything bigger than 10mm and the 10mm guns have pretty heavy slides. Glocks also have nicely curved and rounded back straps in addition to be semi-auto pistols. There is absolutely nothing harsh about any Glock recoil with the possible exception of the 43 just because the grip is so small that it's hard to hold onto.

>>34854373
Glocks I would buy in a heartbeat:

1. Slim single stack .44mag
2. A bullpup Glock mag taking carbine in 10mm or 9mm.

I don't see anything else missing from their catalog. The Glock 19 is small enough that there's no reason for a single stack magazine.

>>34856779

Because it looks niggery.

>and I have 8.5 inch length hands.

>>34868852
Glock can't handle 44mag

File: 474853f1a1e05cavemanairforce.jpg (109KB, 360x450px) Image search: [Google]

109KB, 360x450px

A G43 sized 10mm.

>>34868889
They handle 460 Rowland just fine, and that's a higher pressure cartridge than 44m

>>34854567
If you don't ever bother to check whether a gun is loaded, you should not be allowed near firearms

>>34854373
Ar-15 clone?

>>34860335
what's the mag cap, like 4?

File: 1458940310188.png (13KB, 657x527px) Image search: [Google]

13KB, 657x527px

>>34868852
>Glock 19
>single stack mag

File: 1502639121925.jpg (5KB, 151x150px) Image search: [Google]

5KB, 151x150px

>>34856335

>>34868336
>low bore axis
>forward grip angle + hump
>dual recoil springs in gen 4

Literally better recoil mitigation than any other polymer handgun.

>>34855821
Completely serious.

All I can think of is forward slide serrations, which is a meme.

>>34854373
Hopefully anything other than an uninspired, polymer, striker fired handgun

>>34854373
You guys are all going to be disappointed.

It's going to be a single-stack .45 GAP in the 42/43 style frame.

>>34854440
The expression is "couldn't give a shit". You are implying that circumstances leave the possibility of you giving a shit. Could implies potential for shit-giving. If you're going to be monolingual you should at least be familiar with your mother tongue.

>>34854373
Regular compact sized (i.e. Glock 19 sized) 10mm that doesn't require a mag extension for a full grip. DO IT FAGGOTS YOU'RE SO FUCKING SCARED TO TAKE MY MONEY

>>34854373
Perhaps they've finally figured a way of making it out of porcelain.

File: them.jpg (60KB, 605x422px) Image search: [Google]

60KB, 605x422px

>>34869566

File: glockspace.jpg (21KB, 382x316px) Image search: [Google]

21KB, 382x316px

>Glock-brand buttplug

Glock 40 thug edition

>>34869464
>The gun no one asked for

>>34867987
>>34868658
>>34869230

Found the noguns. Where talking about recoil from a .40 cal not 9mm genius


Shoot a glock 43 n shield 9mm side by side n you'll see shield has least recoil.

I know this personally because my dads shield 9mm has less recoil den my glock 19 is it a problem no just something to take notice.

>>34870122
.45 Gay and Proud > .45 Actually Can't Penetrate

>>34870646
Glock 43 is smaller than a shield and hard to hold on to thanks to the tiny grip. It's the exception that proves the rule as I already mentioned in the very post you're responding to >>34868658, limp wristed faggot.

>>34856698
Go away, 9gag

>>34854373
I know the 19m and 17m are the most likely but if they hade a 20m I would finally fall for the 10mememeter

File: 1911gock.jpg (306KB, 1000x776px) Image search: [Google]

306KB, 1000x776px

>>34854373

>>34872039
Anon, haha. Where did you find this one?!

>>34872039
hahah, great pic.

File: FREEDOM.png (146KB, 500x333px) Image search: [Google]

146KB, 500x333px

>>34872039
I might actually pay money for this

File: Kriss vector .45acp mag extender.jpg (18KB, 317x600px) Image search: [Google]

18KB, 317x600px

Maybe it will be a 10mm with a 30 round mag?

File: 500px-Daewoo-K2.jpg (8KB, 500x134px) Image search: [Google]

8KB, 500x134px

A polymer Daewoo?

>>34854422
/thread

>>34870997
I don't have problems with recoil you projecting faggot. I'm telling the guy I replied to if he doesn't like his shield he won't,like a single stack glock in .40 cal since glock slides aren't heavier like a m&p slide.

File: retard alert.gif (473KB, 500x361px) Image search: [Google]

473KB, 500x361px

>>34855785

>>34877361
Cry more

File: image.jpg (114KB, 806x815px) Image search: [Google]

114KB, 806x815px

>>34855529

>>34854472
There is literally nothing wrong with point blank. I buy so many guns they don't even charge me for range time and I'm so deadly accurate they let me rapid fire.
Heck, I was next to a guy with a full auto uzi looking gun one day.

File: Made in Australia.png (512KB, 1010x466px) Image search: [Google]

512KB, 1010x466px

b... but if there's no finger grooves, how will I know where to put my fingers?

>>34880823
I think they could make some pretty nice target shooting pistol caliber carbines if they tried.

Considering they're easy to find for $400 new, and that they actually work and hold up quite well, they're hardly comparable to Apple products.

Kimber would be closer, all a bunch of flashy and expensive 1911s, that feature a nice trigger but often a shoddy everything else due to non-existent QC.
Also they used to be good once, so they actually fit Apple quite well.

If this >>>34874296 is true, rearranging the lines reveals a disturbing secret about the new gun.

-Changes in the safety plunger
-Ambidextrous slide release
-Longer recoil spring assembly
-Magazine well cutout

-No finger grooved
-A new tougher finish
-Reinforced forward notch for the recoil spring assembly
-Changes in the rifling

-Flared magwell
-A smoother trigger similar to the G42/43
-Magazines have an extended front lip

>Calm Narc Senpai

File: GWG.jpg (71KB, 500x375px) Image search: [Google]

71KB, 500x375px

>>34880957
Holy Shit, 100% verified.

>>34880957
Holy Shit! BOOF is still around?

>>34855527
>17 frame with a 19 slide
That's a thing? I've heard of the opposite being a thing, but that sounds a bit retarded.

>>34856698
xD

>>34855527
>>34881418
>17 frame with a 19 slide
wouldnt that be like pissing on your balls cause you have a chode?

>>34880823
Maybe they'll add a Grip Zone™

File: P220_Carry_L_sm-F.jpg (68KB, 802x600px) Image search: [Google]

68KB, 802x600px

>>34881534
>>34881418
>>34855527
SIG and Springfield/HS have been doing this for years and calling them "Carry" models. They're better for OWB and pleb-tier horizontal shoulder holsters. It's basically what happens when you take the Colt Commander/Springfield Champion concept to the extreme.

http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2017/06/27/glock-19-mhs-23-mhs-photos/

>>34881344
I know, he's got to be like 50.

I hope it's a 1911 or a revolver just so I can watch people lose their shit about it.

They're finally making a .22

>>34882302
LGS has a Kimber revolver... It'd be so sweet if it were black tenifer with a polygamy barrel.

>>34883579
You mean like one of them Mormon guns?

File: poison.png (84KB, 192x250px) Image search: [Google]

84KB, 192x250px

LOL>>34881590

>>34879579
Il bee crying with my glock 19. Rutgers security six and gp1975 ak Mr.noguns faggot.

>>34884840
You have bad taste.
Your Glock 19 is weak.
Your Rugers are inferior to S&W.

>>34884840
Can you even hit anything?
I don't think you can.
Mr. NoGroups

>>34884840
Fail

>>34854373

A literal hand grenade

>>34882010
And they are idiots who make guns that aren't drop safe and hate the very people they market guns to.

>>34854581
Gross
Get out and stay gone faggot.

File: IMG_1797.gif (2MB, 640x480px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 640x480px

>>34885438

It seems pretty obvious it's going to be the "carry model" with external safety.