How to cripple north korea with only 11 trident missiles
>>34826831
Just to be clear, this covers almost all of the airbase HQs and all of the nuclear facilities in north korea. I forgot to nuke all the military bases, which there are significantly less of.
http://www.mitpressjournals.org/doi/full/10.1162/ISEC_a_00273
Here you go OP.
How to nuke NK, only kill a few hundred , win the qar, and doom humanity
Low yield b61 high accuracy, low casualty, pre-emtive attack vs w88 attack.
>>34826903
These nuclear strikes weren't surface detonations. They were airbursts which have little to no nuclear fallout. Your argument is nill
>>34826903
Also, B-61s are BOMBS W-88s are WARHEADS. The B-61 needs a bomber, which can be detected by radar, to deliver it to a target. While the W-88 only needs a trident missile, which can't be shot down. Also, koreans are commies, not people. You don't feel remorse for killing commies now, do you anon?
Those tabs....
Obligatory thread theme
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7XmDYJBZZdc
>>34827145
>>34827182
>>34826903
Does this diagram predate the new airburst fuses being built for the W88?
>>34827034
> what is a B2 for 500.
>>34826831
> those tabs
You're overdoing it.
>>34826997
>>34826903
Are not surface detonations either. For the w88.
This is from a white paper that discusses the new option of high accuracy low yield, low fallout attacks.
It uses b61-12 , becausr if dial-a-yeild and the upgraded guidence system that gets thrm a cep of less than 30 meters.
That accuracy and yeild control dont exist on w88. Even with the new errorncorrectibg fusing that w88 has , your still talking about a 455kt warhead.
The b61-12 attack uses a yeil less than 1kt
>>34828932
>B2 for 500
No, the B-2 is for 2.1B.
The B-21 is supposed to be for 500M.