Why wouldn't North Korea put some of its bulky nuclear weapons inside its submarines? They could attempt to take out a aircraft carrier or sneak them into enemy ports.
I would expect a nuclear SLBM to be North Koreas ace in the hole if there's a serious threat of attack.
>>34816766
Because their loud, shitty subs would be detected 500 billion lightyears away and sunk.
>>34816766
Too risky against the all powerful fishing net
>rust
But mainly what
>>34817077
said
>>34816766
They can do anything that sounds scary enough to justify increased defense spending.
>>34816766
>painting your subs green
>>34816766
They have an SSB.
http://www.hisutton.com/Analysis%20-%20Sinpo%20Class%20Ballistic%20Missile%20Sub.html
North korean submarines were obsolete in 1960.
They were fucking designed in 1949.
>>34817077
>Because their loud
What does North Korean weed have to do with subs? You think we're talking about sandwiches?
>>34817077
>>34817375
The north Korean sub fleet is 70 boats strong. Most of these are old, but they're diesels, so they can just turn the engines off and wait.
>>34817375
It's not green, it's copper.
>>34817077
How big do you think the world is?
>>34819318
The superpowers basically have microphone buoys everywhere, the US moreso than anyone else; unless you're extremely quiet, your chances of evasion are extremely limited.
>>34816766
Smuggle parts into China, assemble it in a conex box, bribe their way onto a ship.