Americans explain yourselves

>>34778774
Obviously to perfect flying in all four dimensions

when two pilo... planes love each other very much...

File: Post_YFW.jpg (35KB, 745x768px) Image search: [Google]

35KB, 745x768px

Post YFW this flies overhead.

File: conan_thank-you.gif (445KB, 400x183px) Image search: [Google]

445KB, 400x183px

>>34778878
Here is me and I am not even natural American probably if I was: stiff boner.

File: i came.webm (716KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

716KB, 1280x720px

>>34778878

>>34778878
>someone just said something so stupid that 1940, 1980, and 2017 are all coming to kick their ass
god help them, and god bless the united states of america

>>34778878

What's the one on top? I recognize the rest. Is it another P-51 or something different?

File: 1447665543833.gif (1MB, 386x286px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 386x286px

>>34778878

>>34779231
Another P-51, yes

File: B-29x2.jpg (104KB, 1024x683px) Image search: [Google]

104KB, 1024x683px

>>34778774

File: Oh shit, nigger.jpg (10KB, 152x167px) Image search: [Google]

10KB, 152x167px

>>34778878
Fucking War Thunder matchmaking.

File: 294def4a722c719c1373d4c4d884ffbf305f06dae5f5d740b988b08a69eaa1d3.jpg (31KB, 481x439px) Image search: [Google]

31KB, 481x439px

>>34778878

File: 1497352531148.jpg (8KB, 320x256px) Image search: [Google]

8KB, 320x256px

>>34778878

>>34778774
Why not?

File: Blue Angels3.webm (323KB, 720x404px) Image search: [Google]

323KB, 720x404px

>>34778774
So you can do this.

File: image.jpg (156KB, 1280x739px) Image search: [Google]

156KB, 1280x739px

>>34778774
Because we're oddly prescient like that

>>34778953
take your trip off outside arg u autist

File: 1498711350396.gif (943KB, 500x275px) Image search: [Google]

943KB, 500x275px

>>34779656

>>34778878
it was pretty amazing 2 weeks ago
(oshkosh)

>>34779593
Lyl

>>34779593
fucking kek

File: general_dynamics_F-16_CCV_3.jpg (97KB, 750x300px) Image search: [Google]

97KB, 750x300px

>>34778774

wtf I love america now!

File: American planes.webm (455KB, 480x360px) Image search: [Google]

455KB, 480x360px

>>34778878

>>34779930
>P51 at max emergency power
>F15 and F22 about to stall

>>34779953
kek

>>34779665
no

>>34779953
>A10 pilot desperately trying to keep himself from BRRTing

File: A-10_Gun_Gas_Diverter_Photo_2.jpg (275KB, 1275x800px) Image search: [Google]

275KB, 1275x800px

>>34779993

hehehehe

>>34778878
SLOSHKOSH 2017

>>34779993
Gross

File: gau-8_meets_vw_type_1.jpg (200KB, 1800x1150px) Image search: [Google]

200KB, 1800x1150px

>>34780050
well you're just taking an overly sexual viewpoint on this, mate.

>>34779993
more like BRRRRAAAAAAPPPPP

File: 1462647306248.png (650KB, 587x600px) Image search: [Google]

650KB, 587x600px

>>34778878

>>34779953
bs, their stall speed isn't probably even much different otherwise they couldn't even land properly

File: 1329537444155.jpg (29KB, 602x604px) Image search: [Google]

29KB, 602x604px

>>34778878

>>34780102
Its very different. Jet fighters need much longer runways because they land much faster and are much heavier.

The MiG21 for instance even needs a drogue chute.

>>34779993
Probably removed that button. Didn't remove the cannon of course that what 90% of the plane is.

>>34780102

landing speed of the 15 should be around 150 knots

p-51 has a stall speed of about 86 knots

this makes sense since the f-15 is about twice the wing loading of a 51

>>34780234
it's pretty similar though in the sense that even i-153 chaika could fly faster than 150 knots

>>34780155
F-15 stall speed is ~130 knots
P-51 stall speed is ~85 knots

>>34778774
Cause fuck Bernoulli. That's why.

>>34779953
>F-22
>stall

lol

>>34780545
>I don't understand basic aerodynamic theory: The Post

>>34780604
>I don't know how to fly: the post

File: 20170312_114348.jpg (46KB, 537x955px) Image search: [Google]

46KB, 537x955px

>>34780717
>implying
pic related

You're the retard that thinks an F-22 can't stall.

>>34780752
with thrust vectoring and a thrust to weight ratio near 1:1, how can the F-22 possibly stall?

>>34780798
Because stalling has nothing to do with thrust, thrust to weight, or the vector of thrust application you dunce.

>>34780798
Do you really not know what AoA is or how or why planes, even super gee wiz F-22's, have a maximum AoA?

File: 200%American.jpg (176KB, 934x834px) Image search: [Google]

176KB, 934x834px

>>34778878

>>34780545
Anon are you trying to be retarded on purpose?

>>34780798
>I don't know how a wing works: The Post

>>34780809
the plane can still stall obviously if theres no thrust but because the thrust to weight ratio is so high, the f-22 can easily recover without much effort.

File: oh my god you guys.gif (519KB, 200x189px) Image search: [Google]

519KB, 200x189px

>>34779656

>>34780752
FUCK Man! Watch out for that pitchfork.

>>34780856
stalling and recovering from a stall are two completely different things.

Most planes can easily recover from a stall, regardless of thrust.

>>34780856
How cute, babby thinks the only way a plane can stall is a minimum speed stall.

Stall recovery has to do with airspeed and angle of attack. Without those you wont recover no matter how much thrust you have.

Many planes with close to and greater than 1:1 thrust to weight can not escape a stall even at full afterburner.

A wing does not work unless it has sufficient air moving over it at a sufficiently low angle of attack. Thrust does not fix this or change the underlying physics.

>>34780002
A jew-hog. Now i've seen everything

>>34779930
Why isn't the A10 flying in reverse using the recoil of its 30mm cannon for thrust?

>>34778878
>Warthunder_matchmaker.jpg

>>34781040
>late to the party
>someone already made the joke

>>34780856
See, you're caught up with the basic idea of a stall; plane flies too slow, no airflow over wing, crashes. That's definitely a stall. The issue is that's just the type of stall most private general aviation aircraft are going to experience. In truth an airfoil can stall at any speed or angle of attack, it's all about airflow over the wing. Thrust vectoring and a high thrust to weight ratio are critical for -recovering- from a stall, but have much less to do with actually entering it. Thrust vectoring and thrust to weight ratio will help, you're right, but stalling an F22 is a real possibility.
Here's a clip of NASA's HARV F18 doing some absolutely bonkers high angle of attack bullshit. https://youtu.be/SViiqylV0lA?t=4m14s