Shit anti-funners say

>>34769324
>thats not kosher
>its the sabbath, time for temple
>oy vey
>i'll take the matzo

>>34769340
I sometimes use "kosher" in passing while talking to salesmen at gun desks just to see if it triggers them.

File: 1500261971099.jpg (22KB, 600x452px) Image search: [Google]

22KB, 600x452px

>no one needs to have an assault rifle
>oh, is that a machinegun!?
>if someone tried to rob me I would just fight them
>i dont need a gun because im not a coward
>who needs a gun for home defense when you have a baseball bat
>only a criminal needs a gun, to kill people
>if we ban guns it would make crime go away
>if a civilian shot at a shooter then the gun fight would lead to more deaths
>this isnt the wild west
>a kid could shoot up a school with that gun
>cops exist for a reason

>>34769340
>Is there a manager I can speak to?

File: What.png (610KB, 435x652px) Image search: [Google]

610KB, 435x652px

>>34769324
>That's just another communist weapon that was probably used to KILL AMERICANS
Dad has said this one to me numerous times unironically. The most recent time was when I mentioned my VEPR was based on an RPK receiver
>Anon you take martial arts, why do you neeEEEEeed a gun?
>If nobody used guns for self-defense then criminals wouldn't have to use them!
>Killing in self-defense is WRONG!
>Just use a taser!
>No one is coming for your guns, but we also need to adopt Australia and the UK's model for gun control
>Just aim for the arm or leg
>Gun control would never devolve into a means of political, racial, or class repression

File: Oh for God's sake Niles.jpg (75KB, 720x540px) Image search: [Google]

75KB, 720x540px

>White men just want guns to shoot black people who pursue interracial relationships.

>White slave owners taught their kids to shoot to help them execute black slaves

>You have a German last name, Anon. It's very obvious why you *think* you need a gun. *libtard Nazi salutes*

>Jews and marginalized groups need guns to defend themselves from White Oppression, but not the other way around. Giving White People guns just means a lot of goose-stepping and genocide is about to happen.

>You know the Colonists fought off the British with common hunting muskets used by rural farmers right? They didn't need the military version the British used and we don't either. We can repel North Korea just fine with shotguns.

>I love how North Korea has no gun ownership and no gun crime and yet Conservatives still act all smug, as if our murder rate is something to be proud of.

>Only police and the military need guns
IN THE SAME FUCKING CONVERSATION
>Letting veterans keep their guns is a mass shooting waiting to happen. These people were conditioned to be psychopathic killing machines. That's like leaving your attack dog near your kids with no chain.

>>34769324
I had a crazy one one time:
>no one but police need guns
I was a corrections officer out of uniform and asked the liquor store attendant why
>well because crime
She then went on a rant how the police were racist and something needed to be done
>well I am a responsible citizen, I have never committed a crime. Why can't I have a gun.
she starts sperging about how she likes her Xanax but that's a crime so gun owners can't own guns
>well FYI I am a LEO and you just said I shouldn't have a gun, but said only police need guns
She got super autistic and said she wasn't willing to sell to me because I was a "government paid murderer".

Just laughed my ass off and watched 2 other customers shake their heads as the left to go to the liquor store 2 blocks down.

File: 3073462-6780343819-Peezl.jpg (71KB, 707x500px) Image search: [Google]

71KB, 707x500px

>"Stop taking your gun out to show people it makes us nervous"
>"Stop emailing people hunting videos"
>"The unibomber wasn't justified, he killed kids anon"
I have never even heard a single person even play devils advocate in my office; I want to quit so bad.

>>34770221
What were the Nazis gun laws like anyways? I can see them swinging both ways

>why don't people just shoot criminals in the leg instead of killing them?

File: 1909839_1004682677210_2547_n.jpg (44KB, 604x453px) Image search: [Google]

44KB, 604x453px

>>"Look at Japan, they have strict gun laws and their crime rate is really low. We should be more like Japan."

File: DISGUSTING.jpg (990KB, 1814x2419px) Image search: [Google]

990KB, 1814x2419px

>>34769602
>aim for the arm or leg
nothing triggers me more than people saying that, as if it's not possible to bleed to death if you fuck up major arteries/veins, or that it's easy to aim for the arms/legs, especially if the target is actually running, or that unless you kneecap them on the first shot they probably won't be disabled instantly without followup shots

>if a person wouldnt get the death penalty for assaulting a police officer then the officer has no right to murder his assailant

this is shit i actually used to say

i polluted many minds as an edgy teen

File: 7506130120114816g.jpg (48KB, 732x448px) Image search: [Google]

48KB, 732x448px

>>34772806
Nazi gun laws depended heavily on wether you were a member of the party or not and if you were in one of the occupied territories.

I remember this kid who found some British rifle casings. Was stopped and searched by the Germans and arrested. Some time later there was a prisoner transport that was raided by the partisans and that kid was shot along with 19 others in a retribution.

In Beevor's book about the Battle of Berlin I remember reading that the amount of hunting licenses and gun licenses shot up for party members shot up tremendously in '45.

>>34772848
Sounds good, I'll get rid of my guns when you get rid of all the niggers.

File: 1495600825836.png (141KB, 296x290px) Image search: [Google]

141KB, 296x290px

>>34772866
>Tfw sister wants to be cop in California
>Tfw she told me that somebody told her that cops are required by law to aim for the limbs because it won't kill
>Tfw she didn't believe me when I told her about major arteries, such as the femoral artery, and how getting even a small cut on those is life threatening
God, I hate this fucking state.

>>34770221
who the hell are you talking to? do you go to college or something?

>>34772340
>the unabomber wasn't justified
hate it when people say this, especially when they haven't even read his book. fucking leftists

>>34773106
>killing people because you don't like how fast technology is advancing is justified
You're on the fucking internet dude, how hypocritical can you be?

>>34773133
have you actually read his manifesto?

>>34773133
my post was somewhat satirical if you couldn't tell, but just because i'm against technology doesn't mean i can't use it. it's like a staunch lolbertarian getting welfare, or a communist participating in capitalist activities like having a job or eating food. technology is harming mankind longterm. someday i do want to live off the grid, or at least in a fairly rural area, but i need quite a bit of money to set up the infrastructure of that

>>34773188
what does his manifesto say

File: xD.png (38KB, 666x666px) Image search: [Google]

38KB, 666x666px

>why don't policemen just shoot the gun out of the shooters hand?

Can't you leave just it at home this time?
Why would you need it at X location?

File: cyberpunk dark souls.jpg (565KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

565KB, 1920x1080px

>>34773191
>technology is harming mankind longterm.
No. Absolutely not. All of us are alive only because of technology. It is impossible to even attempt to feed the amounts of people we have in the world without the extremely high technology that we have nowadays. If everyone were to try and homestead like you plan to, there'd simply not be any space to feed everyone, because small house farms are hilariously inefficient. Don't confuse romanticism with mass production facts.
What you're spouting is pure idiocy and short-sighted hypocrisy. The answer isn't less technology. It's more. The only way out is through.

File: 1499561129030.png (233KB, 520x423px) Image search: [Google]

233KB, 520x423px

>>34773304
Forgot my meme arrows...

>>34769324
>Got first shotgun this year
>Tell a friend I bought a gun
>"Why?"
Happened 4 times so far. But nobody's thrown a fit over it either.

>>34773213
He points out that the modern world leads to people feeling unfulfilled with their lives but it is not just anti-technology ranting like the media says it is. Read it.

>>34773540
Yeah I did. His bullshit about worthwhile pursuits makes me laugh at him even more. And who chooses what is a worthwhile pursuit? Him? He mouths off with a completely ridiculous perspective on the past, as if every big invention wasn't the labor of a hundred people at least all chipping in over the years. Exactly like engineering is nowadays. Unabomber was little more than an articulate but intellectually dishonest luddite; someone who despaired at the sheer size of the world we live in today and whose despair led him to believe that the correct way to proceed is to blow it up and start over. A small mind lost in a big world. Pitiful really.

>>34773540
If he's right, why do you use a computer?

>>34769324
>PLEASE DON'T KILL ME
Is usually what they say before the Zyklon-B hits them. Sometimes the soccermoms whine about their kids while I'm euthanizing them.

>>34772877

Flagellate your self with a handful of boresnakes as penance.

>>34769324
>Shit anti-funners say

Every breath they take, really.

>>34773094
>female cops
Bad move, can't reliably physically restrain suspects, leads to more shootings from panicked chicks

>>34770303
>corrections officer
>LEO
Pick one

>>34773310
You made some good rational points, but they were all under the assumption that the good of mankind and the health of mankind are one in the same. The technology that has feed so many people has also let many survive that would have died. It's a hard understanding, but over population is a coming issue.

The technology you claim as necessary for survival, has the power to make people live longer than they did yesterday, and today more healthy babies born today, than ever before.

It is easy to feel happy and comforted by these facts but at the same time their consequences will probably have disastrous effects for future generations. Every day there is less and less space, our resources are already to the point that they can not be naturally reproduced fast enough.

>>34773609
>it is not just anti-technology ranting like the media says it is

>>34769475
>cops exist for a reason
>get rid of all the cops they're RACIST!!!!

>>34772848
Who wants to shoot people when you've got qt 3.14 jap girls to fuck and drink with?

>>34769324
you'll just end up shooting yourself by accident
or someone will shoot you with your own gun

>>34773310
>All of us are alive only because of technology
?
>impossible to feed
so? having 7 point whatever billion people is a result of civilization, technology, and modern agriculture.
>if people actually had to try to survive, and natural selection became a real process affecting humans again
i don't see the problem with this

>>34772898
They still cared about licensing with the reds knocking on their door? What a bunch of retarded faggots.

>>34773924
>Humans
>natural selection ever again
No, it's impossible. Not as long as there is powerplays and intelligent humans in the equation, the most powerful of the bunch will always rig the game. Humans have practically unshackled themselves from normal evolutionary pressures and have made up their own new ones wholesale.

Also ebin meme edgeworthiness, try not to cut yourself.

>>34773812
the life expectancy after surviving childhood hasn't gone up much since the bronze age (about +10 years or so). weak humans naturally die as kids, i mean it's sad and shit but that's how the strongest survive. now anyone can reproduce, and any kid can and will survive to adulthood, bringing down the rest of the species.

>>34773916
>time comes to choose, women or guns
>he chooses women
hahahahaha ur gay

>>34773943
which was the edgy part? suggesting the only solution to overpopulation, not feeding them? or was it implying that humans are getting weaker through evolution, which is a fact you don't believe or care about, because humans are so smart and above nature

>>34772866
>just shoot the gut out of his hands

>>34773980
The former obviously, since you were objectively wrong about the latter.

>>34773927
It sounds like bullshit to me, because the Nazis deregulated long arms for German citizens right before the war, so that they could train citizens under the guise of "sports shooting clubs" without officially rearming.

The only licence restrictions were for handguns and manufacturing guns, as well as not selling to Jews of course. But they weren't citizens anymore by that time.

@civilization fag
not arguing with people who don't accept facts. at least look into the idea of humans being stronger and smarter before civilization and modern agriculture pls

>Why didn't the cop just shoot the gun out of the suspect's hand?
>Why couldn't the cop just shoot the suspect in the leg? He didn't have to kill him!
>Why didn't the cop just fire into the air/ground to scare the criminal so he'd drop his gun?
>Why did the cop have to shoot that person holding a realistic-looking airsoft gun even after repeated warnings to drop it, use of a tazer, and the fact that the person pointing the gun at the cops was known for having suicidal tenancies?
>Why did the cop fire 5 times?! That's so excessive he could have just shot him once and dropped him because all of my knowledge about shootings comes from movies and everyone knows when you're shot by a pistol round you'll fly backwards 5 feet and die instantly!

Cop shootings really expose who doesn't know what the fuck they're talking about around here. Of course then our cops go and do something like shoot an unarmed Australian woman in her PJs so it's hard to feel bad for them at all.

File: come on now.jpg (78KB, 338x305px) Image search: [Google]

78KB, 338x305px

>Yes, I am a feminist.
>But guns should be banned!
>We just need to teach men not to rape and murder! That's much easier than taking reasonable measures to defend yourself!

>>34773908

To be fair, I haven't heard the "Only the police should have guns!" canard used unironically since Ferguson, so maybe the Left is starting to grow a brain.

>>34774304
>Why couldn't the cop just shoot the suspect in the leg? He didn't have to kill him!
The most common and the one that really gets me. If anyone of them had actually seen someone get shot in the leg or whatever they'd shut up about it being non-lethal

>>34774358
On the other hand, it kind of seems to work erry time when German cops do it.

>>34774304
>Of course then our cops go and do something like shoot an unarmed Australian woman in her PJs so it's hard to feel bad for them at all.
she was a fucking communist from sydney.

>>34769324
>Guns don't prevent crime, they encourage it.

>>34774843
wait she was a commie?
sauce?
that changes everything

>>34774872
well, she was a pole, a "yoga dance instructor" (aka one of those new age faggots who are basically communists anyway), she absolutely hated guns, and she believed that cops should be the only people to own guns.

and she was from sydney. i don't think she had children either.

she deserved it, trust me.

>>34774843
The officer was from a third world shit hole hired to fill a minority quota

>>34774853
The fuck? Who said that.

File: Aku and Dongs.png (53KB, 831x181px) Image search: [Google]

53KB, 831x181px

>>34769475
>if someone tried to rob me I would just fight them
>i dont need a gun because im not a coward

This shit makes me laugh and fap while my sides are being holocausted by shitty memes. Seriously though, they go with the stereotype that gun owners are knuckle-dragging apes yet they go spouting the most primitive shit.

>>34773540
So the answer is to kill people?

That's a retarded conclusion.

>>34769324
I feel like 75% of the shit repeated here is said by a woman

>>34773752
Corrections are still sworn leos

>>34774882

>hurr someone deserves to be murdered by a Somali cop for no reason just because of their political beliefs

>>>/pol/ is THAT way, bud -->

>>34775093
i genuinely believe that melbourne should be wiped clean with a nuclear warhead. you have nothing on me, rabbi.

>>34772848
inuyasha is a great show and that guy is incorrent

>>34773969
>women or guns
>choosing women
>ever
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bxI6zACECTw

>>34773094
>sister wants to be a cop
Christ. Tell her they're easier ways to get chad cock than being a cop. There were so many girls st my exam and none looked like they could take each other into custody without lethal force forget about them being able to with a dude. Chick cops are the worst, quota hires

File: img000012.png (303KB, 827x605px) Image search: [Google]

303KB, 827x605px

>>34774919
>if someone tried to rob me I would just fight them
This gets me the most. The law applies to everyone, would you tell a old grandmother she can't carry a gun in self defense? She should just punch the assailant? There isn't even an argument, it's just an attack on your "manliness".

>>34773980
i think the whole thing about weakening the gene pool isnt how it seems. the real world isnt blackeddotjew healthy normal people seek relationships with other healthy normal people and only trash seeks out trash.
you dont see david hasselhoff fucking a sheboon now do you and despite the u mad wite boi stuff commonly seen around the net most healthy people arent after a knuckle dragging crotch grabber.

if you think back to medieval times there were always people in separate castes of reproduction. porn nowadays tries to delude people into thinking the opposite.

>>34769602
>Just use a tazer
>Liberals and women unironically think you can get a taser
>Implying taser brand even makes their civvie Star trek phaser looking taser anymore
>Implying tasers don't fall into a severe grey area of SD law due to needing to shoot your attacker, then STAYING PUT TO KEEP PULLING THE TRIGGER to keep them incapacitated instead of fleeing to safety

Same thing with women thinking of mace as an offensive weapon and not a delaying tactic. No concept of backspray or their attacker simply getting so angry after getting maced that they turn this rape into a murder.

>>34769324
>that guy really pissed me off he's lucky I don't carry a gun
the fucking irony

heard this one just today

I'm watching the Newtown documentary with my girlfriend and holy shit is it hilarious once you get past the segments of the kids when it's just the parents bitching and lobbying.

Anyone from El cajon?
>Alfred Olango
>Niggers come FROM LA to defend this fucking guy.
>WHY DID THE POLICE STEAL THAT GIRLS PHONE
>WHY DID THEY SHOOT HIM X AMOUNT OF TIMES
>WHY DID THEY SHOOT HIM AT ALL, IT WASNT A GUN IT WAS A VAPE
>I DONT CARE THAT HE WAS IN SHOOTING POSITION THATS JUST AN EXCUSE TO NOT SHOW US THE VIDEO
>turns out police asked for ladies phone with footage
>WHY DIDNT THEY JUST EMAIL THE VIDEO INSTEAD OF TAKING IT AS EVIDENCE
>they release photos from video
>THEYRE HIDING SOMETHING WHY DONT THEY SHOW THE VIDEO
>they release the video of Alfred Olango being shot by police on local news live for families and children to see
>....
My grandmother and aunt disowned me previously because I sided with police. Fuck anticop people and fuck antigun people

>>34775472
Put an open zip tie on the trigger, pull it after you shoot and run like hell. It becomes lethal, at that point, right? I wonder if you'd get fucked for torturing someone to death if you did that.

Would most tasers run out before he died?

>>34775479
They're usually the same people who would say they "don't want a gun because they don't trust themselves," but it's a two sided copout. They don't ever want to confront anyone, so they don't have a gun, and they wouldn't confront someone with it because they would never confront anyone, so they say they "would totally just merk people because I'm such an edgy bad lad inside" as an excuse not to get one.

But then you have to wonder... are those people actually that impulsive and unhealthy? I think saying "I don't trust myself with a gun" should be grounds to have you locked away and evaluated.

These people don't seem to realize they drive cars every single day.

>>34776890
>But then you have to wonder... are those people actually that impulsive and unhealthy?
yes. notice how all of those people generally start drinking more when they're stressed? notice how they all take drugs? notice how they all have no self esteem? notice how they hate themselves, their country, and their people?

they are deeply, deeply unhealthy and they are projecting.

>>34777164
I mean, not really. Most of the people that interact with me like that drink irregularly, and get "haha pretty drunk" from a couple beers.I don't think I know a single drug user that doesn't have a gun.

I'm not even trying to disagree with you, or whatever. The rest is super clearly true.
>no self esteem
Check, this is why they roleplay "healthy straight edge well off young male"
>hate themselves
Yep, that's why they have no self esteem
>their country
Yep, they're brainwashed by liberals who were brainwashed by commies(and some are even commies!) and can't understand the phrase "shall not"
>their people
Well it's not that, they think they love everyone. That's why we need to take guns away to protect everyone. That's how stupid they really are. They're convinced it's for the greater good.

Wait, do you mean republicans? I mean, let's be fair. We ARE literal nazis. Hardly "their people" amirite?

>Only white, straight males should have guns!
>The 2nd amendment is outdated and wasn't meant to offer freedoms to women and niggers!

>>34777314
>Most of the people that interact with me like that drink irregularly, and get "haha pretty drunk" from a couple beers.I don't think I know a single drug user that doesn't have a gun.
99% of people who "don't drink that often" end up drinking excessively during times of stress, and by "drug user" i don't mean people who take meth and other hardcore substances, i mean weed too. the weak leftist loves anything that will disconnect them from reality.

>Well it's not that, they think they love everyone. That's why we need to take guns away to protect everyone. That's how stupid they really are. They're convinced it's for the greater good.
this type of thinking is extremely common when dealing with abusers and narcissists. how is depriving someone of the ability to protect themselves an act of "love"?

>Wait, do you mean republicans? I mean, let's be fair. We ARE literal nazis. Hardly "their people" amirite?
i was talking more in the german volk sense. they hate their own blood. we are nazis, but we shouldn't tell them that yet.

>>34774006
>Proofs? What proofs?
>I do not need any proofs, what are you of talking about???
>YOU are needing proofs not me for I make the point, you get brooves for me
This is what you sound like.

>>34777400
I mean people that smoke cannabis, I live in colorado. I see the same people at the brick and mortar shop that I see at the free public range, for the most part. I'd imagine the other ones go to the range at the gun club? If I knew someone who had a gun and kept heroin I would unironically tell the police exactly where it was.

I used to live just outside nashville, so gun ownership is a default anyway there. Really, I think gun attitudes and drug use are correlated, but neither is causal of the other. I think that more liberals live in places like NY and commiefornia that are antigun by default, and those people are also highly pro-legalize it.

They think they're depriving the criminals of guns too. They point out other countries that already have no guns have no gun crime. I get the feeling they also think that carriers all have criminal impulses anyway.

They also buy into the meme that owning a gun will actually kill your family, so they think you're putting them in danger for a hypothetical situation as if you're rigging them with bomb vests.

>>34777496
I mean, I'd probably turn a nigga in anyway, but if you have a deadly weapon and show a flagrant disregard for the law/willingness to risk getting caught then I think you're a serious danger to society, and you need to be locked away.

>>34777329
Nice parallel universe you got there.

As a bong traveling with other bongs in Eastern Europe
>The police here all have guns! They make me so nervous!

>>34770221
my god this sounds like some sort of dyspotian wolrd, thier compare us to nazi's? I hate nazi's, how can these people not see they are becoming what they hate.

>>34773812
t. Malthus

File: 19904880_475316002823252_7936362975089639643_n.jpg (42KB, 528x960px) Image search: [Google]

42KB, 528x960px

>no i dont "tolerate" African Americans like you bigot hes culturally enriching my family by even existing,


oh yeah hes definitely enriching your wife Ted

>not letting him go out with my wife is oppressing him!

>>34778494

Statistically racist conservatives and rednecks are the primary and most enthusiastic consumers of cuckoldry and cuck pornography.

Liberals just skip the cuck part and do outright interracial relationships.

>>34773812
That's why we need to euthanize and sterilize people with mental issues and diseases.

>>34777576
He's quoting posts that have been made on /k/

>>34775479

My co worker said that last night. All because some guy on a motorcycle cut him off.

>>34778441
bootlicker pls fuck off

>>34774319
I fucking hate TEACH MEN NOT TO RAPE
I'm not some fucking shark you dumb twat, no one needs to be taught that that's bad. Christ.

>>34769324
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2WGMjdXp2vg

How I feel sometimes when they ask.

>>34769340
The super jewy side of my family all carry guns.
That's how you don't get shoahed.

>>34769340
Go back to your containment board.

File: 1419666554436.jpg (149KB, 900x750px) Image search: [Google]

149KB, 900x750px

>Co-worker 1: There's no reason for someone to have an assault rifle. It's like, what are you gonna need full auto for?
>Co-worker 2: Yeah you can't even hunt with them anyway.

>>34772386
Makes me fucking laugh every time

Is there a gallery of these somewhere

>>34769324
last night had somebody tell me nobody should have a gun that can shoot over a kilometer

a .22 can shoot over a kilometer

>>34772866

Its not just that, Officer "Shoots Once a Year to Qualify" will undoubtedly miss the arm or leg he was aiming at and send rounds flying around the neighborhood. A center mass shot is safer for all involved with the exception of the guy being shot.

File: proofs.jpg (9KB, 277x271px) Image search: [Google]

9KB, 277x271px

>>34778552
>Statistically racist conservatives and rednecks are the primary and most enthusiastic consumers of cuckoldry and cuck pornography.

>>34774843
Everything living thing from Sydney and Melbourne deserves to be removed from existence.

>t. Sydney man

>>34769324
My dad likes my m14 but thinks my ar15 is an assault weapon

File: wot.jpg (18KB, 326x260px) Image search: [Google]

18KB, 326x260px

>>34775264
i couldnt even get through half of that.