Was this a good gun in terms of its contemporaries in WW2? Would many consider it one of the most important guns in history?
>>34766231
>M60
>Dressed up as an FG42
I.... I never knew I needed this
>>34766231
>Was this a good gun in terms of its contemporaries in WW2?
Didn't really have any contemporaries, but it was a fine enough rifle for the role it had. Definitely not one of the most important, of the period or otherwise.
>>34766318
Basicly the same thing.
I guess its kind of similar to the L86 LSW in the sense that they're both mag fed machine guns that can also double as long range marksman rifles
>>34766568
Didn't it field with a 1.5x scope?
>>34766614
4x, the ZF4. You're thinking of the ZF41, which was issued mostly on K98ks.
Not all FG42s got them, but then again, considering how few were made anyway, it's kind of a wash.
it was a good rifle but i don't really see what makes it important.
Besides being absolutely critical to keep well ammoed in Wolfenstein this gun was not that important
Didnt Walther make these?
>>34766386
>Didn't really have any contemporaries
Ahem
>>34768514
Not employed the same way, at least from my understanding. It wasn't supposed to supplant or replace the MG42.
>>34766318
More like a M249/Mk48 receiver and feed cover connected to an MG42/3 pistol grip.
>still agreed extreme penis hardness