Why won't glock design a rifle?

>>34761132
And they do it well.

they make knifes too OP

File: 1494073843048.jpg (52KB, 552x607px) Image search: [Google]

52KB, 552x607px

>>34761132

File: IMG_8943.jpg (25KB, 400x267px) Image search: [Google]

25KB, 400x267px

>>34761147
Shitty ones

>>34761132
Honestly they should make PDWs and pistol caliber carbines. They're what's big now, and if they managed to make a polymer bullpup using their own mags, they could meme another generation of cops into thinking they've got space age tech.

>>34761132
Good question. I'd buy one if just for the novelty.

File: glock-18-stock.jpg (126KB, 800x600px) Image search: [Google]

126KB, 800x600px

>>34761132
>Why won't glock design a rifle?

They did. It got banned.

their pistols sell well enough by themselves i suppose. they dont have to make anything else.

>>34761167
They explode in your hand too?

File: c800b1_85e931efbcf546b796dd491035a92c27.jpg_srz_980_789_85_22_0.50_1.20_0.00_jpg_srz.png (1022KB, 980x789px) Image search: [Google]

1022KB, 980x789px

>>34761205
I think there's a lot of potential.

>>34761167
They're 30 bucks, though.
Unlike French army $400 bayonets...

>>34761256
>>34761193
It would be nice if there weren't an exposed reciprocating slide positioned that close to the user's face.

>>34761256
i dont disagree at all. what im saying is the company probably doesnt want to invest potentially millions to create a new product when they dont really have to.
they sell tons of pistols, i guess whoever is in charge decided thats good enough.

>>34761232
KeK

>>34761271
Yeah, I mean why would they want to double dip into their large and obsessively loyal fan base and sell a boatload of rifles ?

>>34761331
who knows, im not a glock executive.