Can you guys prove the PAK-FA is not a 6th gen?

>>34760037
No S-ducts, its just a 4th++

File: 0_13b407_6e2d828b_XL.jpg (46KB, 800x608px) Image search: [Google]

46KB, 800x608px

It's clearly an 8th generation plane

>>34760063
>No S-ducts, its just a 4th++
>OPs pic
>Guys, we need to make a photo of the PAKFA, so cover up or upstruct the view in the air intakes like on every other picture!
It is almost uncanny how often you can see that on those pictures. I am aware there is one picture not doing this, but it is still so evidently happening in the others.

>>34760037
The burden of proof is on you friend

It's not. The MiG Skat won the 6th gen. Bid. So they're finishing up the deaign for it.

>>34760037
PakiFa, PakiFa
Does whatever a 4th gen can
He's a Su-27
In a drag
Look out! Here comes the PakiFaaaa

>>34760037
PAK-FA is 57th generation fighter komrade

>>34760037

while its a shitty troll effort, OP does have a tiny kernel of truth.

no-one called F4s or Mig-21s "third gen". No one called Mig-29s and Eurofighters or F16s "fourth gen".

the entire "fifth generation" term was a marketing buzzword created by lockheed-martin to sell the F22. people have been lapping it up for years, but it was never a term used prior to the F22. No-one launched thier jet, be it a EE lightning, or a SU-17, or a F104, or a Draaken, or whatever, and claimed it was the first nth generation.

People have been suckered into the entire generational bullshit, hook, line and sinker.

>>34760336
The term actually came from the Russians.