Why is /k/ so worried about women soldiers? Its been proven

>>34757941
No it hasn't

>>34757941
>Its been proven by many militaries throughout the world that they are just as capable as male soldiers
go ahead and elaborate, masterb8r

>>34757941
Their pussy smells.

>>34757941
>Why is /k/ so worried about women soldiers?
I'm not. I really don't care.

>>34757941
>Why is /k/ so worried about women soldiers?
We aren't, it's like 10 anons here who won't shut the fuck up about it.

>>34757941

Wrong.

>>34757941
i'd give them both a poke.

>>34757941
Honestly I feel for the sake of true "equality" the bar of them being able to enlist in any part should be lifted.

And then if the standards are maintained as they should be the problem solves itself. Barely any will get in.

And those that do will cause minimal effects on the rest of the Infantry/Cavalry units.

>>34758000
>trips
but you must understand that there are pussified stronk women supporters that will make exceptions in order to get women into positions they aren't qualified for so they can be credited on the cover of time magazine.

File: gender_and_combat.jpg (61KB, 640x683px) Image search: [Google]

61KB, 640x683px

>>34757941
>proven by many militaries throughout the world that they are just as capable as male soldiers

No, it hasn't.

File: gender grip strength.png (646KB, 1050x1050px) Image search: [Google]

646KB, 1050x1050px

>>34757941
>they are just as capable as male soldiers

[citation needed]

>>34757982
Cause there's only like 10 anons actually in mil?

When a fucking general in the army goes to oversee how the women in Ranger selection are doing, which NEVER happens for men, you know it's because something's fucky.

>>34758144
Niggers also have greater physical strength than whites. Should we have an all black army? Physical strength doesn't matter as much when you have a gun.

>>34758155
here

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rRfCpQx_FDE

check your privilege

>>34758126

I do sadly. It's pretty much a problem that won't be solved since people are fucking idiots rather than being sensible.

File: 1493547235909.jpg (169KB, 1242x853px) Image search: [Google]

169KB, 1242x853px

>>34757941

>>34758174
Tbh we'd do better if we just put all the niggers in the infantry. Give them a rifle and ammo and just point them to a target to chimp out on.

>>34757941
>Its been proven by many militaries throughout the world that they are just as capable as male soldiers

Nope.

https://www.scribd.com/doc/280017557/Marine-Corps-gender-integration-research-executive-summary

>>34757941
You do know that FET's(female engagement teams) are used for the psychological of just making the muslim tribal leaders stressed not because they are "equal or better" soldiers right? They don't even realize that they are there just to fuck up the norm so the said tribal leaders will agree to whatever just so they'll go away.

File: 14433081_652115608297120_9062449137285075560_n.jpg (51KB, 405x720px) Image search: [Google]

51KB, 405x720px

>>34757941
I've served with a few female soldiers

MPs, EODs, ECMs, Comms, K9s, OPMIs, medics. Some of them could keep up with us and some of them did indeed perform in firefights, but i can't imagine them getting in the down and dirty with bayonets.

Their presence tends to keep things civil for the most part. But i think some people see them as a threat to what is undoubtedly a male dominated interest.

On the other side my Sgt has dated a few female soldiers who hes had t work with
An MP, this came in handy when we got caught
Apache pilot
Italian servicewoman
American Intelligence captain
OPMI
He's currently married to a captain in the intelligence corps

They're all pretty good looking IMO apart from the MP, Oink oink oink

Always warned us that if he ever caught us dating another soldier he's set us straight, mind you he's a "Do as i say not as i do" kind of leader

File: female and male strength.jpg (103KB, 579x588px) Image search: [Google]

103KB, 579x588px

>>34758174
Physical strength is a big factor in the 99% of fighting that happens before pulling a trigger is ever relevant.

>ruck to the obj
>breach door
>evac a casualty
>extract a wrecked vehicle

How can someone who can't even ruck 60 pounds in 3 hours for 12 miles on a flat road contribute in Afghanistan's mountains?

File: 1398759963997.jpg (134KB, 912x683px) Image search: [Google]

134KB, 912x683px

>>34757941
Because /k/ secretly is gay

>>34758256
> inb4 traps aren't gay

File: 1471478249253.jpg (65KB, 680x818px) Image search: [Google]

65KB, 680x818px

>>34758193
I keep seeing this image everywhere and I have no doubt it's true but does anyone have the unedited original? Not even image search comes up with anything.

File: IMG_8775.jpg (232KB, 1242x853px) Image search: [Google]

232KB, 1242x853px

Considering how far we have beaten the subject and topic of this horse into a pulpous mass of biological matter, and how frequent this thread keeps coming up time and time and time again, I can only conclude that:
>OP(s) is/are some faggot baiter(s)
>They're a bunch of college fags trying to get some sort of statistic survey on this site
>Are some form of pic related
Are the fucking results from the past thousands of threads not good enough for you? Do you just want (OP)'s as some form of (you)? Or are you guys just gonna go full ad hom like he couple last times for (you)'s

>>34758174
>The military is just shooting things

File: bamboo-booby-trap.jpg (158KB, 918x689px) Image search: [Google]

158KB, 918x689px

>>34758262
Traps are not gay, but they are nasty (and effective)

File: 1424370621102.jpg (101KB, 820x811px) Image search: [Google]

101KB, 820x811px

>>34758186
Damn.
If you refuse to fight, you're a scared pussy.
If you lose the fight, you're weak and got beat up by a woman.
If you win the fight, you're a horrible person that beat up a woman.

File: 1475167896875.jpg (88KB, 640x558px) Image search: [Google]

88KB, 640x558px

>>34758333
> read first line
> RAGE
> second line
> laughter

File: that's my fetish.gif (2MB, 280x182px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 280x182px

>>34758333

>>34757941
im so tired of seeing this fucking thread over and over again. why isnt this fag banned?

File: a woman on women in combat.jpg (641KB, 677x2422px) Image search: [Google]

641KB, 677x2422px

>>34758242

File: CHUNK.jpg (292KB, 1400x637px) Image search: [Google]

292KB, 1400x637px

>>34758357

File: jessica lynches truck.jpg (35KB, 538x403px) Image search: [Google]

35KB, 538x403px

>>34758362
yeah man i said they could keep up with us, i didn't say they were descended from the titans like we.

I saw jessica lyches truck when i was in iraq

File: 1486334158214.jpg (7KB, 246x250px) Image search: [Google]

7KB, 246x250px

>>34758174
Just keep them away from water and you'd be set

File: ClLfF7TUkAAddNd.jpg large.jpg (153KB, 1024x1365px) Image search: [Google]

153KB, 1024x1365px

>>34758262
Does it matter?

File: missing on purpose & pink PT belts.jpg (309KB, 765x1586px) Image search: [Google]

309KB, 765x1586px

>>34758242
>>34758362
Yo he's the guy from the greentext!

You only want women on the front line so you can Pink PT belt them

>>34758000
>And those that do will cause minimal effects on the rest of the Infantry/Cavalry units.
Is this basically saying there's no pros to picking women before men?

File: females at ranger school.png (799KB, 530x1403px) Image search: [Google]

799KB, 530x1403px

>>34758393
What was 'us'?

I was in light ("light") infantry and we had a hard enough time carrying our own loads in Afghanistan. Women tear their ACLs, throw out their backs and have random pelvic fractures just from rucking in garrison, at over 10x the frequency of male injuries. From a logistical, institutional perspective they can't. Their certainly weren't any out there with me struggling around with 90 or 100 pound rucks.

>>34757941
Two words: FOXHOLE QUEEFS

>>34758449
is that an argument for or against?

>>34758482
For obviously. Use your woobie to cover the hole and dutch oven that shit.

>>34758341
yup
female privilege on display

>>34758174
Niggers do not have greater physical strength than whites, they're just faster

>>34757941
This is bait but I'll bite

C'mon OP a simple google search of IDF stories will show you how incompetent women are

File: women dont go to war apparently.jpg (91KB, 730x487px) Image search: [Google]

91KB, 730x487px

>>34758417
Yeah and?

>>34758443
>light ("light") infantry
don't i know it
Royal lancers - dismounted recce so i know about weight 90-100lbs would be light for us 160lbs at least (yes for real) excluding Main radios, longs, ECM kit, psyops kit ect.

We knew a couple that could pull a 16k tab with 120lbs

Whats your kit list mate?
(all in KG)
Worn On person
mk7 1.4
osprey 14
Blast nappy 0.7
Molle Belt 0.76
Patrol pack 2.14
belt 0.14
Knee pads 0.5
l85 5
24.64

On armour
LAW 2.5
PRR 1.5
3 mags 226 0.6
Sig 226 1
Frag x2 1
smoke x 2 1
Marker x 1 0.5
8.1

On Molle belt
l3a1 w scabbard 2
PVS14 0.5
200rd minimi belt 2.5
Shelter sheet 1
Mags (loaded) x 8 4
Med Kit 1
Water Bottle 1
Bivi Bag 0.25
12.25

In pack
Hydration Pack 3.64
Det Kit 2
binoculars 0.7
Thermal camera 0.6
VIPR 2 weapon sight 1.1
Moskito CITL 1.2
200rd 5.56 2.5
50 rds 9mm 0.6
towels x 2 0.4
Additional water 3
96H rations 9.2
Spray paint 0.5
De mining kit 0.5
Tape 1
Smock 1.2
Socks 2 pair 0.4
T-Shirt 2 0.3
Spare trousers 0.5
29.34

Total - 74.33 KG / 163lbs

Unit carried:
Vallon Mine detector 15
EOD suit 35
Javlin 23
ECM kit 35
Psyops kit 20
Bowman radio 7.2
scattergun 4
Long 7
AW AMR 15
AMR 14

if you call bullshit get a second opinion from here: http://reccesoldier.com/army-kit/weight-of-british-army-kit/

Inb4 are you recceman? no i'm ketamine lancer theres another 3 recce guys on here besides us

File: 1501128377994.jpg (18KB, 509x339px) Image search: [Google]

18KB, 509x339px

>>34757941
Women in general are shit at combat, they have shit spacial awareness, and they're physically weaker than males. There are outliers sure, but the bulk of women do no make great soldiers. Women have many beneficial skillsets that men are lacking, but combat effectiveness sure as fuck isn't one of them. All of our support units that were mixed M/F I heard nothing but horror stories from about the women. Glad I got out before the military went full cukoo with this SJW shit

>>34757941
I hope nobody replies to this bait. Sage goes in all fields.

>>34758174
No they don't. They run faster and that's about it.

>>34757941

>On a cold night during her weeklong captivity in Iraq in the Persian Gulf war, Maj. Rhonda Cornum was loaded into a pickup truck with another American prisoner of war, a young male sergeant, and taken from an underground bunker to a small prison. During the 30-minute drive, an Iraqi guard kissed her repeatedly, pulled a blanket over their heads so that they would not be seen, unzipped her flight suit and fondled her breasts.
Major Cornum, a 37-year-old flight surgeon and biochemist from upstate New York, had broken both arms, smashed her knee and had a bullet in her right shoulder as a result of the downing of her Army helicopter. She screamed in pain when the Iraqi tried to pull her flight suit down over her untreated and swollen arms. Before the ordeal was over, she told a Presidential commission on women in the military this month, she was "violated manually -- vaginally and rectally."
>Major Cornum's testimony stunned some of the members of the commission, which also learned in the hearing that Specialist Melissa Coleman, the other American female prisoner of war in Iraq, was the victim of "indecent assault."

File: 1461192932152.jpg (525KB, 599x1215px) Image search: [Google]

525KB, 599x1215px

>>34757941
>Its been proven by many militaries throughout the world that they are just as capable as male soldiers, so what's the big deal?

Wrong.

>>34757941

basement dweller projection and insecurity. trying to protect a boys' club that they are not even part of.

File: 1499188409342.jpg (100KB, 1080x1086px) Image search: [Google]

100KB, 1080x1086px

>>34758203

File: aBWqAgA_700b.jpg (45KB, 348x468px) Image search: [Google]

45KB, 348x468px

>>34758333

>>34759690
>Shitskin muzzies molesting and raping women

Gee who could've guessed

>>34759690
Why don't they just call it rape

File: images.jpg (20KB, 258x195px) Image search: [Google]

20KB, 258x195px

>>34758203
Nah, just make them Rangers.

>>34758203
no they would be best in laundry

>held to lower physical standards
>given more lee way in grooming standards
>allowed to get pregnant at any time. which puts them on limited duty and keeps them from the field, ranges, and deploymentse for over a year.
>basically a walking UCMJ land mine for any male soldier.
>always missing duty to do appointments for their children.

>>34757941
My unit had a female and she was quite useful. We could store up to three magazines in her snatch and two mortar rounds in her fartbox

>>34758655
>Psyops kit 20

In all curiosity, what's usually contained in your Psyops kit???

>>34758678
>Glad I got out before the military went full cukoo with this SJW shit

With St. Mattis's recent decisions, that might start to change.

>>34761108
Mattis needs to raise female standards up to male standards. PT, body fat, and even tighten up their hair/makeup/jewlery/nails to more male.

>>34757941
Consider that the maximum score women can get on their pushups on an APFT is around the same reps the minimum score for men.

>>34758174
Hello, strawman, what brings your faggot ass here today?

>>34757941
The French army did whole study about this recently, with insight from other military (Canadian, and US, I believe). While they recognized the major differences between the male and female bodies, their conclusions were that, in general, the differences did not warrant rejecting the women from combat roles (Table ronde 2). Note that the French military don't place as much emphasis on raw physical strength as the US does.
They also found a bunch of "male privilege, yada yada.." , inequality and how they had to adapt, etc...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H9teeVZSY1s

Something that surprised me was that they found women could have similar performance to men as fighter pilots "once they identified the anatomic differences between man and women and modified G-pants accordingly". What about boobs? What happens when you pull Gs and your breasts are 6-7 times heavier?

>>34757941
I'm part of /k/.
I'm part of the US military.
I'm part of the infantry.
I don't give a fuck what my battle buddies have in their pants, as long as they are held to the same standard.

File: 6402c9a9f23f31af970274a187852eed.jpg (37KB, 350x458px) Image search: [Google]

37KB, 350x458px

Can merchant protection waifu join in?

>>34758655

That carry load is absurd. No wonder soldiers end up with cracked vertebrae and knee problems.

I remember my late father looking over a list of what my eldest brother carried in the Gulf, and he was shaking his head by the end of it. He was a Vietnam vet, 101st. Bounced between carrying the radio and being the M60 gunner, and even he called bullshit on everything that "light" infantry have to carry now.

I remember him talking about how, weapons and ammo aside, they tried to keep their loads in the 60-75 pound range. And consisting mainly of water, dry socks, and ammo, with a few other things like medical kits and rations topping it off.

Why the hell did an infantryman's equipment loadout get so asininely bloated?

>>34761292
>as long as they are held to the same standard

How does it feel knowing female standards in the American military are significantly lower?

>>34761335
plates add about 15 pounds straight away. then there are optics and batteries. Plus Vietnam didn't require the water (or cold weather gear in Afg) recent wars do.

>>34761250
If I remember correctly, certain "engineering" specifics related to the layout of a womans muscles and circulatory system due to being childbearers makes it much easier for them to restrict blood from pooling in their legs, making them markedly more resistant to the effects of high G's. Them being generally smaller is also seen as a bonus as far as combat pilots go.

Another report I read was more on physiology. Men an generate much more adrenaline in a short period, and spike higher. But women, while spiking lower, are able to maintain the boost for longer periods.

As for women in Combat Arms, I have no objection if they meet the standards. The /same/ standards as the men. Yes, that measn far and away fewer women will make the cut, but that doesn't men those that can should be denied if the volunteer for service.

>>34757941
Fragile masculinity

>>34761390

There's got to be a way to trim some fat off all that. Admittedly, I was never a soldier. The closest I've come to carrying a combat load was hiking with an 80 pack on my back in the mountains with the BSA.

But even then I know full well that piling on that much weight for an extended period is how you break someone. Literally. Whats the use of piling on all the gegaws and extra shit if your infantry are strained, broken physical wrecks at the end of a 20 mile ruck over broken terrain?

Honest question to the infantry here. Were it an option, what would you dump, regs be damned?

>>34761400
What about the boob thing?

>>34761314
female IDF soldiers are a meme. they performed miserably in actual combat. now they are just a propaganda unit, or POGs.

>>34761443
According to most women, they just bind their breasts. If they're firmly squished against the chest, they don't bounce around.

>>34757941
>just as capable as male soldiers

no.
/thread

>>34761335
ruggedizing electronics for military adds weight and bulk.

File: women soldiers.jpg (222KB, 960x640px) Image search: [Google]

222KB, 960x640px

>>34757941
>Its been proven by many militaries throughout the world that they are just as capable as male soldiers, so what's the big deal?

>>34757941
For all the talk of anatomical differences and co-ed social dynamics the core issue of chain of command politics is rarely discussed.

File: Blood Mushrooms.png (405KB, 2200x968px) Image search: [Google]

405KB, 2200x968px

>>34757941
Because feminism in America is toxic and politicized.

You can't keep unified standards because women will fail too often and that gets you sued for sexual discrimination and dragged through the mud by politicians in the media.

You can't make them use the same showers/toilets as the men because that's sexual harassment and will sued and dragged through the mud by politicians in the media.

That goes for every little thing. Promotions, disciplinary actions, specialized roles. Everything has to bend over backwards to cater to the women because doing otherwise creates a "hostile work environment" that will open you to legal liability, public humiliation, and career ruination.

Disparate impact theory fucked this country, and its use by people to push an agenda regardless of consequence or viability continues to fuck it.

People in America worry about women soldiers because in America the question isn't whether women can be capable on the front lines. In America the question is whether it's worth putting sub-standard troops who get special treatment on the front lines to make political goodboy points. Because that is what would actually happen in the US.

Also blood mushrooms.

>>34757941
>The average height and weight of women varies around the world, but in the United States in 2010, the average adult female height was 63.8 inches (approximately 5 feet 4 inches
HAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHHA WOMANLETS NOT EVEN ONCE
GO BACK TO THE KITCHEN ROASTIE

>>34758174
Blacks don't have general better physical strength, only in certain areas.

Anyway your comment could have been valid if that was the only factor to combat. Intelligence, resourcefulness, devision making and dicipline. All play a huge roll even in small unit effectivness.

>>34757941
Which branch has the most good looking girls? How would you rank the branches on this

File: computerbaby.jpg (36KB, 262x273px) Image search: [Google]

36KB, 262x273px

>>34761928
>That screen cap
Dear god that reminds me of the time I heard the women at my old job getting pissed off because of the other women that caused their bathroom to get shut down, because they were flushing their pads down the toilet.

>>34761451
Yea but they still kill mudslime if given the chance.

>>34762152
IDF because jews like mixing with slavs and scandis.

>>34761314
She's so much cuter before she became a fucking anorexic.

>>34758281
Probably behind a college login so it's not indexed by Google. The poor Anon that has to take this indoctrination must have tried to cover his tracks hence the black marks.

>>34757941
No.386212156

what do?

>>34762152
USAF, Coast Guard, Navy, Marines, Army.

>>34762258
I was thinking marines will be at the bottom

>>34757941
>just as capable
even if this were true, the rest of the world isn't ready for them.
It's not all about the individuals involved. A war is greater than the soldiers that fight in them.
Male soldiers can't handle being in the same team as female soldiers. They've been trained by evolution and by society to protect women, and they will prioritize this above completing the mission they were assigned.
Every time a female soldier is kidnapped and tortured, it will be on the news media for weeks. The coverage would destroy any war effort we attempt. All rapport gone, no sympathy, no more rules of engagement.
Americans aren't detached enough from women to not turn a country into glass over them.

>>34761069
Loud as fuck speakers for playing music in firefights and screaming takbirs back at them to screw with them

>>34761335
Came about from contingency, us brits like to be independent from support and resupply

>>34761390
>(or cold weather gear in Afg)
Once had to extract some americans with hypothermia because they didn't have thermals or clothes change as they didn't realise how cold it got at night, so were freezing in their own sweat.

>>34761434
I don't think i could remove anything nearly everything there as at least been used once a week on patrol.

Maybe helmets, we'd rarely wear them aside from mortar strikes and danger close.

>>34758144
you forgot to add an average of 5 IQ points smarter than their corresponding race's female

File: 1487726802151.jpg (20KB, 480x366px) Image search: [Google]

20KB, 480x366px

>>34761314
I literally only came to this bait thread for pics of idf hotties and you guys didnt deliver. Fuck all yall and fuck these meme threads

>>34758155
>that one green circle in the 100 range

>>34761451
>now they are just a propaganda unit, or POGs.
nailed it

File: 1492041254001.jpg (45KB, 532x559px) Image search: [Google]

45KB, 532x559px

>>34758333
Doesn't make them less gay.

File: violence.jpg (75KB, 236x369px) Image search: [Google]

75KB, 236x369px

>>34758144
>Greater use of physical and homicidal aggresssion

File: 1489811138614.png (177KB, 540x721px) Image search: [Google]

177KB, 540x721px

>>34762434
>Came about from contingency, us brits like to be independent from support and resupply
Isn't that the benefit of having a logistical system? being able to carry what you need at a specific moment to get you to X_destination just to get resupplied there and start the process over. This way you don't have to carry 150+ pounds of shit everywhere.
>Atleast old school military's used literal mules to haul there extra shit. So that leaves us with.
NIGGA WHAT THE FUCK ARE YOU DOING? Don't know what shit says in Brit field manuals, but in American field manuals, it explicitly states NOT to pack for every contingency, but to only pack for what is likely. And to also plan for pre-planned areas for resupply to avoid said issue of having to haul 150+ pounds of shit. Am I retarded? I don't sound retarded but holey fuck this sounds like a pretty good idea don't you think?

>>34761400
Got sauce for those two facts?

File: james_yeager.jpg (94KB, 640x960px) Image search: [Google]

94KB, 640x960px

If you were in military would you rather have a skinny small woman or Buck Angel next to you in a foxhole?

>>34762953
the point is that we wouldn't go point to point to be resupplied, that way they'd always know your destination.

When we first went out in iraq we used to carry 5 mags, some spare ammo,a medkit and that was it, we'd have to RTB within half an hour leaving our objective uncompleted.
In pack
>Hydration Pack 3.64
Quickest way to stay hydrated without pulling out the water bottle
>Det Kit 2
can't Enter compounds without it
>binoculars 0.7
Can't spot targets (recce remember)
>Thermal camera 0.6
>VIPR 2 weapon sight 1.1
>Moskito CITL 1.2
>200rd 5.56 2.5
This would have to be cracked open every other patrol
>50 rds 9mm 0.6
Wed go through a lot more 9 mil than most people would assume
> towels x 2 0.4
Keeping our feet dry from ditches was paramount
>Additional water 3
Dehydration is a nasty way to go, Hydration pack would do for day 1, water bottle for day 2, additional ration for remaining 2 days
>96H rations 9.2
For either one man overnight, resupplying friendly units, two men two nights, or one man 4 nights
>Spray paint 0.5
Marking Ports for our snipers, IED threats and propaganda removal
>De mining kit 0.5
NEVER LEAVE FOB WITHOUT MINING KIT
>Tape 1
For field repair
>Smock 1.2
For night work
>Socks 2 pair 0.4
Keeping feet dry
>T-Shirt 2 0.3
Change of clothes for night
>Spare trousers 0.5

We'd drop out packs and leave them with our heavy team during firefights.

We'd get stuck out overnight about a third of the time from having to relieve other units in holding positions or we'd have to rearm & resupply other dry units.

File: 1501873347048.jpg (109KB, 736x736px) Image search: [Google]

109KB, 736x736px

>>34763059
Wouldn't using old ass tactics be your solution? Old ass tactics as in literally using pack mules to haul your shit. Think about it. We do this today but with a "Robo-Mule" thing.
Either,
>1 robo-mule per squad
>1 bigger robo-mule for platoon
>1 robo mule with dildos literally everywhere for USMC version
Would this be a viable option. It seems to have worked for soldiers throughout human history, why not now with modern units?
>pic related(from a more retarded thread from earlier)

File: zzzerea.jpg (16KB, 600x600px) Image search: [Google]

16KB, 600x600px

>>34757941
>guaranteed replies

I take the not mental ill woman who is not mutilating her body.

File: 1480226145539.jpg (81KB, 564x774px) Image search: [Google]

81KB, 564x774px

>>34763046
>>34763092

>>34763085
Mules don't shoot back. Just another person i have to look out for.
We tried ATMPs and ATVs to carry, but they just become a target.

File: 1484604907803.jpg (66KB, 419x249px) Image search: [Google]

66KB, 419x249px

>>34763098
I'd rape the absolute fuck out of her and then threaten her with a frag in the pooper if she talks
> A M I R I T E__F E L L A S

>>34763112
Sand nigger or just a nigger?

>>34763116
White nigger

The NVA and viet cong used women soldiers and won so I don't know why other countries don't.

>>34762578
That one blue circle in the 180kg range

>tfw haven't seen anything to prove the "women aren't worth shit" meme

From my experience as a conscript in the Estonian military, the few women we had were overachievers and way more motivated than their male counterparts (mostly because they were there voluntarily and could choose to quit within the first three months, unlike us dudes).

>>34758410
Just looks like some gross trailer trash inbred kid with shitty unbrushed teeth wearing a wig

So yeah it matters.

>>34763335
Look up the statistics from the countries that actually studied men's performance vs women's performance

>>34761928
Holy shit...

Unrelated, do you (or anyone) have the story about the some maintenance guy crawled into a tight as heck space, and there's some high-ranking visit aboard who asks what he's doing and he snaps and yells a bunch of shit back, not realizing who he's talking to? That one always gets me

>>34758000
>if the standards are maintained
There's your problem.

File: 18739941_1193299274130689_7440244225097220828_n.jpg (41KB, 960x733px) Image search: [Google]

41KB, 960x733px

>>34758410
That looks oddly like one of my realitives who killed himself recently, perhaps he just faked it afterall to become a trap?

>>34758000
>barely any will get in

So why increase logistical burden of training when only a few will pass and providing for special needs of these soldiers in the field

>>34757982
no no got that backwards. Like 10 anons won't stop whinging about not enough women in the mil and not enough acceptance.

>>34757941
Maybe as non-combat "troops", militia or reservists when you need numbers in a small army like in Israel or in the Nordic countries.

File: Screenshot_2016-08-03-19-46-41_1.jpg (75KB, 1078x708px) Image search: [Google]

75KB, 1078x708px

Women are good for talking to other women, that's basically it.

File: AvYmTji.jpg (90KB, 1024x538px) Image search: [Google]

90KB, 1024x538px

>>34764370
Also posting more Jegertroppen.

File: KUfLSmj.jpg (72KB, 1024x682px) Image search: [Google]

72KB, 1024x682px

>>34764393

File: dff1a1efe3022ef3876ef7f77cac95ad.jpg (98KB, 1024x683px) Image search: [Google]

98KB, 1024x683px

>>34764398

File: 2d11232ffa697c7355b309b0142b8538.jpg (71KB, 1024x683px) Image search: [Google]

71KB, 1024x683px

>>34764401
Tactical dicksucking hole

File: _95390566_jegertroppen1415-104.jpg (44KB, 976x549px) Image search: [Google]

44KB, 976x549px

>>34764409

File: Jegertroppen1415-135.jpg (52KB, 768x432px) Image search: [Google]

52KB, 768x432px

>>34764412

>>34758174
Actually whites are physically stronger then blacks, which is why powerlifting is pretty much a white only sport

>>34757977
>>>/b/

Is incumbent urination really that much of a problem?

>>34757941
Women break up unit cohesion (ever see male and female mixed sports teams do well?) and have heavy maternity costs because people always end up fucking them. It was a bad experiment. Women don't belong in the military anyplace other than the medical services and national guard.

File: Manny_Pardo.png (5KB, 460x555px) Image search: [Google]

5KB, 460x555px

>>34758144
>thicker skin

>>34764560
Stronger grips as well

>>34757941
So does anybody have any proof that women can actually tough it out like men can? With all the lesser standards for military entrance and testing it's difficult to find an example.

>>34757941
/k/ isn't worried about women soldiers. /k/ is worried about male soldiers.

>>34757941
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=STkhXT5i25c

File: 1498844707718.gif (2MB, 500x485px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 500x485px

>>34763112

>>34763100
Use goats. Snackbars won't shoot them in hopes of getting their dicks wet.

>>34758174
I think a "black ops division" dedicated to logistical support, retrieving wounded men under fire, and other activities which require strength and endurance without tactical discretion is a pretty good idea.

>>34761722
Alright, I'm biting the bullet and admitting I'm retarded. I don't see what she's doing wrong besides holding the gun in a stupid way. I guess pointing at herself breaks the safety rules, but I see that mistake so often that it doesn't even surprise me anymore.

>>34758443
faggot ass propaganda shit. i feel bad for the soldiers who participated in this particular ranger school because you know deep down the know they did a bitch version, and were cheated out of the real experience.

>>34765193
she is actually pointing both of her firearms at her. her M16 muzzle is resting on her lower abdomen.

>>34758174
this is a fallacy propagated by weak ass limp wristed white boys who sit on their ass all day while black kids, in general are running the streets, getting in fights, and playing basketball since they were 5. just stop it's embarrassing.

>>34760586
Because the Federal legal definition of rape is "dick in vagina". Sodomy is "dick in ass" and everything else is just sexual assault.

>>34761722
>two star general

>>34765231
Wow, I didn't see that at first. Thanks anon.

>>34758443
Yeah, where is this coming from? It's funny, but how legit is this?

>>34764629
Not with out propaganda studies similar to the "vaunted female russian sniper" myth.

>>34766484
>Last weekend a combat anon who experienced first hand what happens with woman in a combat zone. Had a melt down on this board because of your shit posting. He saw a girls head turn inside out by a sniper. That's some brutal shit to see.
None of that has anything to do with the thread topc. If the mods decide a thread doesn't belong they will delete it quickly enough. Stop playing the 4chan mall ninja.

>>34766584
It has everything to do with the thread topic. The Mods did remove the last one. It is a inflammatory subject for those who were in combat zones were Military woman were killed. It also has nothing to do with weapons, it is a political subject and does not belong in /K. This is clearly a sadistic bait post to cause a negative emotional response as it did last weekend.

File: 10308108_1414056848869473_304126412817022348_n.jpg (30KB, 380x510px) Image search: [Google]

30KB, 380x510px

>>34764370
>>34764393
>>34764398

I don't see anything wrong with women soldiers. IF anything they should contribute to troop moral by giving the men a tool for sexual release between missions.

>>34766484
>Saged and reported.
I was banned once for saying this. Shame if it would happen to you too

>>34757941

I'm not worried.

>>34757941
I was in the first Infantry OSUT class to have females and most of those bitches were shit at everything. From pt to rifle marksmanship they just barely passed.

>>34766888
checked, but more seriously given the fact that quite a few women who join the military are massive sluts, we may as well make "Female Companion" an actual MOS

>>34767222
Ouch

>>34764398
Lowering eye to weapon.


2/5, recycle for additional training

>>34757941

It hurts muh ego

>>34757941
We have this thread every two weeks. Just stop already.

File: 1501280821954.jpg (39KB, 500x333px) Image search: [Google]

39KB, 500x333px

>>34762218
Makes sense. Thank you anon.

>>34760774
>given more lee way in grooming standards
fucking this.
>Female: put it in a sock and call it a day
>Male: there's a hair touching your left ear, stand the fuck by

>>34758186
>All those boos at the end

Oh, fuck off.

>>34762350
Marines tend to be tryhards at everything, including looking decent, whereas Army women tend to be JUST tier more often.

>>34768232
Was that the thread where the Anon lost his shit because he was involved in the rescue of that Maintenance Battalion that got ambushed in the Battle of Nasiriyah. I saw that thread.

>>34757941
Firstly, no. Women on the battlefield become rapemeat and bargaining chips wil the the enemy.

Secondly. It's not about letting women fight.
It's about all the weaklings who think they can operate just as hard as normal, mentally stable soldiers.

We don't want some emotional basket case carrying a weapon in our fob!

>>34757941
They're sluts who bring jealousy and descension into the ranks.

>>34761335
It's called overmatch; basically the obsession is that an Infantryman must ALWAYS be wearing equipment that outperforms his opponent, even when it's actually detrimental or doesn't really matter that much.

So you've got heavier and heavier ballistic protection, more gear to carry, a heavier rifle with more ammunition, more grenades, etc.

File: 825.jpg (5KB, 247x204px) Image search: [Google]

5KB, 247x204px

>>34758655
Boxers
Socks
T-shirt
AR15
3 Mags
Bottle of water

File: you deserve a seizure for your post.gif (21KB, 768x646px) Image search: [Google]

21KB, 768x646px

>>34766718
>This is clearly a sadistic bait post to cause a negative emotional response as it did last weekend

>>34757941
>>34758174

Ffs how fucking dumb are you?

go to /pol/ if you wanna be this ass blasted about shit that no one cares about because its painfully obvious.

>>34757966
>quality post.

>>34762166
Serious question. What happens when they have there period. We're do the tampons go.

>>34761443
Ace bandages. It's uncomfortable as fuck but gets the job done.

File: iq.png (27KB, 486x309px) Image search: [Google]

27KB, 486x309px

>>34762481

how'd you figure

for typical military recruits its probably the opposite. pic related, yellow arrow is where the military recruits from

>>34771719
The trashcan. Not even joking.

File: america32.png (257KB, 313x398px) Image search: [Google]

257KB, 313x398px

>>34758174
typical americuck and his nigger fantasies

>>34764506
ahahha lol newfags right hahah

Closetfag pol autismos are triggered by everything what is not a white male and they cant stoo whining

>>34758655

Motherfucker there's no way all you tea sippers are rocking 160lb kits.

units in lbs

I had PRC2000 radio 20
3liters of water 7
m16 with KAC rails ACOG VFG 9.5
armor, kneepads, delt pads, elbow pads 30
6 5.56 mags i dunno probably 6 lbs
3 9mm mags probably 2
1 beretta M9 2
misc bullshit on my gear, trauma kit, knife 4
might have grenades depending on what was happening 3
ACH 1.5
if it's nighttime add another 1
might have food 3
rip it 1

That's 80-100 lbs depending on what was happening. there were times I had 2 batteries for the radio for no fucking reason. So I had a heavier kit than most even without a spare battery and that sucked massive balls. There's no fucking way you guys run around apologizing to the enemy with 160lbs on your backs. I think you've got your KG conversion fucked m8.

>>34758174
No they don't you retard.

>>34772555
How long were your patrols? Ours were up to 16 hours if you include static overwatch for other patrols. Sometimes longer if we were doing recce work.

>>34769888
RTB after first contact

>>34757941
>Its been proven that they are just as capable as male soldiers

it has not

>>34763046
I prefer the biggest lesbian possible honestly.

>>34757941
By /k/ you mean /pol/, fuck off faggot

>>34772936
>Russia
>Israel
>basically every European military

>>34775757
>Russia
Effective, Capable, and Russian do not go together unless you're discussing Vodka or AK's
>Israel
Segregated units after numerous incidents showing it was bad for unit cohesion, and unit survival.
>Every European Military
Effective, Capable. Name one. One. That is effective, and capable, with females in combat roles. Please.

>>34757941
Name one that isn't on the ropes surrounded by enemies or on the verge of being destroyed.

Most females in western militaries are promotional material, and not seriously considered a force multuplier. At best they can do support marginaly, even then, I's rather have men driving supply trucks least we have another jessica lynch.

>>34764543
This is the problem. Its great if a few can meet the standard. The next problem is that the dynamic within the unit changes as soon as they arrive. Killers need that cohesion and walking on egg shells bc spc laura doesnt like dick jokes or has a period is a fucking problem.

File: yes.jpg (14KB, 303x414px) Image search: [Google]

14KB, 303x414px

>>34763112
You wouldn't happen to be of slavic origins, correct?

File: 7495859102_287d5ead4a_k.jpg (1MB, 2048x1365px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2048x1365px

they can do plenty of stuff that frees up men to do the actual fighting

>>34766888
No... NO NO NO NOPE NADA NEIN NEIGHT BOO YAO.

One, STDs. Two, if she was an asshole and felt like it, she can try and pin you and whoever else she fucked on a rape claim.

>>34763930
>>34763822

The problem really is I completely understand your viewpoint and agree with it. But sadly for us the Military is but another Political football field.

If I had it my way they'd be restricted from Infantry/Cavalry units since it's a place where war is waged, not social experiments. In civilian life they can have all the equality they want in civil services.

But that will never happen and the best way to brace it is what I think should happen. The whole "female infantry yeah!" hype will die and thus stop being a problem.

Though as I say that there'll just be a big controversy about why Women aren't joining Combat units instead.

Just kill me now.

>>34757941
Because it's a man's godgiven right to go fight a war and not get nagged until he gets home.

>>34757941
Because 4chan is filled with a bunch of insecure cucks

File: newman.gif (1014KB, 500x280px) Image search: [Google]

1014KB, 500x280px

>>34777818
>surprised that a government institution that takes orders from politicians turned into a political arena

mfw welfare queens who complain against females in the green berets get booted by three tranny judges

>>34771719
>>34762166 here. As >>34771836 pointed out, they were supposed to put them in the trash like a normal woman would. They were just being lazy, and refused to put them in the trash can, even when the can was right next to the fucking toilet.

>>34776123
FUCKING THIS!! Even the mere accusation of a rape, regardless if the accused is innocent, is enough to ruin a soldiers career.

>>34757941
Except we're not?

More importantly why is ScarJo's mag halfway out?

File: 1497485452012.jpg (84KB, 500x345px) Image search: [Google]

84KB, 500x345px

>>34758174
>Should we have an all black army?
Sure, while we are at it lets give them their own country too.

>>34763122
You could have just said "slav".

>>34757982
Pretty much this. Most of us don't give a fuck. Honestly, if I were a mod I'd make these fucking threads verboten.