Is there are reason to not have a .40 Caliber handgun?

honestly? no.
.40 is a favorite caliber of mine

>>34757824
>Is there any downside here?
No more than choosing 9mm or 45. Everything has minor tradeoffs.

Fuck off Kit Kat

>>34757836
This will be my first side arm thats not a revolver or slav-tier

To my understanding the only real difference is capacity vs stopping power. I figure a .40 is a nice compromise

>>34757951
Price is also a factor, 9mm will be cheaper to buy, 40 in between 9 and .45.

>>34757824
Only downside is magpul doesn't make 40 cal mags for Glocks yet

CA-fag here.

Because of gun restrictions, and mag limits, I tested out a CZ75 in a range with .40 and it was great.

>>34759692
Oh fug I love magpul. Hope they hurry

File: Screen Shot 2017-06-28 at 8.33.40 AM.png (97KB, 1337x665px) Image search: [Google]

97KB, 1337x665px

.40 might be a little outdated because of some of the recent 9mm defensive loads, but it's still a fine catridge that gets the job done quite well. Pic related.

Go for it.