Would it have been a good replacement for the 163?

if they were in a position where they can replace the 163 then they wouldn't need to build the 163

>>34751910

Both that and the Me-163 were retarded. Now go read a history book instead of fapping to wunderwaffe.

>>34751910
Anything is better than the me 163. The rocket fuel was a real hazard and the idea of only having power on take off and for a limited amount of time was not the future of aviation.

Having the Me 262 fitted out as a proper fighter and mass produced would have been much smarter

>fly me163
>Melt if it leaks fuel
I think anything would have been an improvement over that retarded dorito.

>>34751910
Flew an Me 163 in IL-2, at max thrust the damn thing would go into an unrecoverable nose-dive and piledrive itself into the ground at fuck-you speed. Wtf was up with that