Say something nice about her

>>34729077
plane with a toilet

>>34729077
She's weighs less than your mom anon

it looks like a cute, friendly duck

Body of a supermodel, face of a Mexican.

>>34729077
You can get out of your seat and take a nap, make coffee, take a dump. That's pretty cool.

>>34729077
Nice mig.

>>34729088
I concur.

>>34729088
Also with an oven

>>34729077
she kill Syria Terrorist

>>34729077
That thing must have god tier visibility for a tandem cockpit plane.

I wonder how much those giant peices of plexiglas cost?

>>34729077
She was fun in BF2.

>>34730380
>Mig
>is clearly a Yak

>>34729077
The pinnacle of Russian aircraft design.

File: 1501577325866.jpg (43KB, 800x529px) Image search: [Google]

43KB, 800x529px

>>34729077
They managed to put a fucking bench seat in a fighter-bomber

>>34729077
The side-by-side cockpit really ruins the Flanker aesthetic though

>>34730821
theirs a bathroom too.

File: 474866-vlcsnap_00731_super.jpg (29KB, 600x450px) Image search: [Google]

29KB, 600x450px

>>34729077
Thunderquack!

>>34729077
Awesome front-line bomber. Capable carrier-killer. We have nothing close to that.

And yes, it has a toilet, galley and armored/pressurized crew capsule while being just a bit less maneuverable than ordinary Su-27. Is it good enough for ya?

>>34729088
>>34730529
Sounds comfy.

>>34729088
Its a piss bottle in a mini room that they use to enter the plane via staircase. Thats like calling my bedroom a bathroom.

The Ford of aerocraft

File: file.png (394KB, 640x430px) Image search: [Google]

394KB, 640x430px

>>34731358
>We have nothing close to that.
you have F-14

and F-111

but you buried them all

>>34730670
>tandem
Nope, side-by-side.

>>34731439
Don't remind me :(

>>34731358
The USA has the F-15E Strike Eagle which is like the way better option.

She'll always find her way back to the ground!

Sometimes quicker than others.

File: 14430002801240.jpg (1MB, 2560x1706px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2560x1706px

>>34731388
so you're gonna sit here and pretend it's not good for pilots to be able to stand-up even if it's mini-rooms or piss-bottle they use? fuck off
never mind the side-by-side seating arrangement which is obviously the best and max /comfy/
does it REALLY hurt your asshole THIS much to admit Russians have a good fighter-bomber? god, you're pathetic, then again if I was some jingoist fatass the illusion of "my" army being the ultimate best would probably be the only thing I have
in any case, the su34 is fuckin beautiful

>>34729077
she has a very feminine penis

>>34729088
>plane with a toilet
You mean they have an elevator on that plane?

>"Oh su-34-chan your intakes are bigger than I imagined"
>"They are Sukhoi!"

>"P-Pilot-senpai, we can't do this, I've only flown once!"

>"Don't worry, it'll fell really good bombing muzzies."

*later that evening*

>"P-Pilot-senpai, I'm taking fire!"

>"Su-chan, I'll drop the bombs!!!"

>"Чтo?!"
>"W-We can't do this, my b-bombs are still untested!"

>"I'm dropping them!!!!"

>"выхoд!!!!!!!!"
>"HHHNGGG!!!!"

>"Did it feel good ?"

>"P-P-Pilot-senpai *pant*, I-I-I'm lea- *pant* king fuel."

>"Su-chan you're dripping !"
>"I love you Su-chan, let's get you back to the airfield"

>"I love you too senpai <3~~"

>>34729088
No wonder India isn't interested in buying them.

>>34732013
you do know that this is a twin seat fighter bomber right

>>34732036
oh yeah, forgot, let's just say he is the narator.
anyway, I'm just on /k/ to shitpost and have no actual knowledge about arms.

>>34732036
Just like in my doujins

>>34731615

he just pointed out...oh nevermind, Ivan

>>34732030
Underrated

>>34731388
>mini room
>piss bottle
Still legit toilet

>>34731358
I'd be careful trying to kill a carrier with a Su-34 if I were you.

>>34731358
F-15 is I think the same role as the Su-34. Just that the F-15 is more geared for being a fighter while the Su-34 is more geared to being a bomber while still being able to hold it's own in air-to-air combat.

>>34730700
Nope, obviously a Lavochkin.

File: 20170731_100714.jpg (1MB, 2592x1944px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2592x1944px

>>34729586

>>34732030
My sides

>>34729077
She is a big plane.

>>34732214

Nope, clearly an Ilyushin

>>34732278
>>34732214
>>34730700
>>34730380
it's Tupolev retards

>>34731388
It should be a cup that goes over your dick n' balls with a hose that leads to a reservoir and with a light suction to vacuum the pee out your dick. Much more efficient.

>>34729088
How does an F-35 pilot go to the toilet?

>>34732571
i think he either doesn't or right into the pants of his suit

>>34732574
I guess it would be feasible to just hold it in. 30 minute flight time and all that.

>>34732571
there are 3 toilets in f35 for each gender

>>34732584
What.

>>34732604
The rotational velocidensity of the f-35's fuel tanks gives it only 30 minutes of combative flight time.

File: Laughing 2.jpg (22KB, 204x240px) Image search: [Google]

22KB, 204x240px

>>34732030

>>34732703
>only 30 min flight time
>2,200km range

By God.... Thats an average speed of over mach 3.5

>>34731439
>>34731592
>>34732209
F-111 would be roughly an equivalent, but vastly outdated nowdays. Not only due old avionics, but because of old airframe and engines.
F-15E is the equivalent of Su-27 in bomber config, not Su-34. Pilot`s comfort and length of the mission requirements are quite different for bomber and fighter, pretending to be a bomber.

>>34732205
She got all the equipment and stats for such task. One of Su-34`s roles, are the replacement of old Tupolev cruise missile carriers. Same range, smaller RCS, and being able to carry the same AShM`s as the former. While being significantly cheaper to produce and maintain, with the same airfield requirements as common Su-27.

>>34732748
Do you even comprehend what "combative flight time" is, and how it is different from maximum cruise time?

>>34732802
Do you even comprehend that we are talking about total flight time, which includes cruise and on station?
>combative flight time
Does not exist as a term, buddy. Go ahead, prove me wrong.
>Buh....buh muh memes!
F-35 still has longer legs than basically all of the platforms it is replacing.

>>34732797
Su-34 has shorter range than the F-15

>>34732278
Nothing is real everything is illushin

>>34732571
Am pilot kid, knowledge is out of date by over a decade but from what I saw they use "piddle packs," piss packs that you wear under your flight suit. When you wanna piss, you just piss. When leaving the flightline on the way into the building, dad would walk towards a big yellow dumpster, stand facing it for a sec fiddling with zipper, and open the thing to toss a little yellow bag on top of a horrifyingly endless pile of them. I always figured DoD should start selling them publicly, gamer nerds would love them.

Maybe they only called them piddle packs in front of me since I was little, idk if anyone active duty can shed more light on this.

>>34732858
Goes slower, with less max g, and way less t/w too.

Can carry just over 3,000lbs more munitions though.

>>34731439

In three thousand years these fossilized F14 will be unearthed by a new civilization that know jack and shit about ours just like we know so little about the bronze age. They'll wonder if those were religious artifacts and how our civilization collapsed.

>>34732902
*BREAKING NEWS*

We have uncovered artifacts from the United States Empires Civil War! Would you like to know more?

>>34732890
http://www.sportys.com/pilotshop/travel-john-pack-of-18.html

>>34729077
quack quacvk.

>>34729077
Good girl.

>>34732902
Maybe they think that humans looked like F-14s

>>34732856
>F-35 still has longer legs than basically all of the platforms it is replacing.

Flat out lie. The f18 is far more fuel efficent because of its double engines.

>>34732876

How can our planes be real if our design bureaus aren't real

>>34729077

She looks like a duck and it makes me smile

>>34733110
Wrong again. F-18 is trounced by the F-35C at all levels in regards to range. For example the F-35C has double the a2a combat radius.

F-35: 760 NMI (1,407 km) for internal air to air configuration

F-18: 400 nmi (460 mi; 741 km) air-air mission

Get fucked.

If she was a pineapple she'd probably would have been a really tasty pineapple, but now it's just a little over ripe.

>>34729077
atleast you are not the f22 or the f35

>>34733201
Yeah, being the best in your class in the world has its challenges.

>>34732703
That's what you get for using lossy data storage.

File: IMG_0716.png (472KB, 448x487px) Image search: [Google]

472KB, 448x487px

>>34732902
Those are f-111s, not f-14s desu.

File: su-34 (20).jpg (201KB, 1500x1010px) Image search: [Google]

201KB, 1500x1010px

>>34729077
She's fucking badass.

File: su-34 (24).jpg (152KB, 1280x853px) Image search: [Google]

152KB, 1280x853px

>>34730896
Lies.

File: 1500383070242.jpg (236KB, 1109x1479px) Image search: [Google]

236KB, 1109x1479px

>officially a fighter-bomber
>longer than a B-17, with more bombload
why tho

It's cool but why does a medium-range fighter-bomber need a toilet, place for sleeping and an oven?
Are Russians going overboard on comfort now?

>No AESA
Wussians shourd buy growious Chinese aiwcwaft instead of outdated pranes with PESA wadaws.

>>34734465
Because it's not the 30s.

File: TL6svSw.jpg (180KB, 1752x1168px) Image search: [Google]

180KB, 1752x1168px

>>34729077
Platypus is cute.

>>34731358
>Awesome front-line bomber. Capable carrier-killer. We have nothing close to that.

USAF and USN can do same as Russians can do with Su-34 with lighter planes thanks to much more common precision guided weaponry.

>while being just a bit less maneuverable than ordinary Su-27

Su-34 is quite a bit heavier than Su-27. Empty weight is 5 tons higher and maximum takeoff weight is about 15 tons higher.

>>34731439
>you have F-14

Iran is only country with flight worthy F-14's. All USN aircraft have been wrecked in way that those can't be fixed, with spare parts being melted, so those can't get into Iranian hands trough black market.

>F-111 but you buried them all

Americans just scrapped theirs, Aussies are ones that buried theirs.

>>34732797
>F-15E is the equivalent of Su-27 in bomber config

Nope. Su-27 has only limited multi-role capabilities, it's avionics are extremely limited for bombing missions, it is pure fighter. F-15E has far more capable avionics than Su-27 when it comes to ground attack. Su-27 with proper multi-role avionics is called Su-30, even that has more limited avionics when compared to F-15E. US has toyed around with stuff like targeting pods lot longer than Russians.

>One of Su-34`s roles, are the replacement of old Tupolev cruise missile carriers. Same range, smaller RCS, and being able to carry the same AShM`s as the former.

While being partial replacement for Tu-22M is true. It can't carry same cruise missiles or even close to same payload, it about half of what Tu-22M can carry. Kh-22 and Kh-15 are way too big for Su-34. Un-refueled range isn't even close to Tu-22M, roughly half.

>>34734708
Hello /an/

File: 14439609174730.jpg (132KB, 500x1652px) Image search: [Google]

132KB, 500x1652px

>>34734708
>much more common precision guided weaponry
So you are pretty much saying Russians rely on dumb bombs for anti-ship missions? Cool story, shitpost more.
>Su-27 has only limited multi-role capabilities, it's avionics are extremely limited for bombing missions, it is pure fighter.
>What the fuck is Su-27SM?
But I'm pretty sure that with "Su-27 in bomber config" he meant Su-30.
>F-15E has far more capable avionics
The same F-15E that has to carry three pods to drop anything remotely precise?
>even that has more limited avionics when compared to F-15E
How jingoistic of you.
>Kh-15 are way too big for Su-34
Wrong. It is an ordinary missile, not gargantuan monstrosity like Kh-22.
>In 1974, Igor Sergeyevich Seleznev became the chief designer of the Raduga. In the same year, the development of X-15 missiles at once several modifications and the universal missile complex "Rastrub" began. In the process of designing the supersonic anti-ship X-15 missile, a number of new technologies were applied, and new unique equipment was created. For the first time in our country, a solid-propellant engine was used on a rocket of this class. It was adopted in 1980 and is part of the airbase of Su-33, Su-34, Tu-22M3, Tu-95MS, Tu-160 aircraft. The main purpose of the X-15 is the defeat of surface targets by class before the cruiser, inclusive. Its modifications are anti-radar X-15P and modernized X-15S.
http://www.ktrv.ru/about/structure/458/459/

>>34736526
F-15E shits all over the Su-30, that's why people compare it the hellduck.

>>34736574
Whatever makes you sleep at night.

File: Stronkair.jpg (138KB, 1024x791px) Image search: [Google]

138KB, 1024x791px

How does this happen?

File: Shinji REEEEEE.png (758KB, 1227x925px) Image search: [Google]

758KB, 1227x925px

>>34731439

>>34731615
>A fighter bomber is good based on whether or not it has a built in /r9k/ piss bottle

>>34730688

BF2 was revived with populated servers since its abandonware.

>>34737724
We fly our jets; the Russians sell theirs.

The numbers would likely look different if, say, the bulk of the F-4's combat service was in the South Vietnamese Air Force or something.

We've basically just ended up the favorable side of a bunch of asymmetric conflicts much more often than the Russians.

>>34738008
BF2 isn't worth playing anyway.

PR is though and its based on the engine.

>>34731439
good, they were old and useless
shit planes

>>34732797
f111 was shit
nothing of value was lost

File: mighistory.png (101KB, 1873x339px) Image search: [Google]

101KB, 1873x339px

>>34737724
Read pic related.

>>34729077
Tell them what kind of penguin you are!

>>34738485
Well thats fucking wrong, it was amazing.

>>34732858
He meant pilot`s endurance. "Range" for an aircraft, capable of aerial refueling is limited by pilot`s endurance.

>>34738020
Except most of the F-15 and F-16's victories are by export jets flown by the jews.

>>34740901
Didn't the Jews ambush some MiG-25s?

>>34729077
she's a good singer

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ozYao1Mju7A

>>34742646
israeli F16 are the same as US F16 because israel is greatest ally

>>34729077
I love the fullback.

I don't think your average jetfag appreciates how big this thing is. It's like a regular fighter doubled in size, with some serious comforts added in. It's nuts.

>>34731439
>that image
It's too much just let me go

File: 1327752701366.jpg (282KB, 950x633px) Image search: [Google]

282KB, 950x633px

>>34742816
Well, its not THAT much larger than ordinary Su-27/30/33. I stood ~ 4 meters from them. Su-27 is called "heavy fighter" for a reason.

File: 1325970207414.jpg (233KB, 455x342px) Image search: [Google]

233KB, 455x342px

>>34731615

Wow, calm down, no need to have a stroke about it.

>>34730367
Are there many bombers where you can't do that?

File: mig-25rb recon suite.jpg (590KB, 900x620px) Image search: [Google]

590KB, 900x620px

>>34742683
They ambushed some MiG-21 when Russians got too cocky. MiG-25 was the one that kept flying over their heads doing recognisance completely out of reach of anything they scrambled or shot at it.

>>34743335
F-15E.

>>34730380
>>34730700
>>34732214
>>34732278
>>34732308

>Su-34
>Su
>SU

Sukhoi.

File: altius-m i want to believe.png (230KB, 687x387px) Image search: [Google]

230KB, 687x387px

>>34743550
I think you got rused.

File: su-34 & su-27.jpg (421KB, 1400x933px) Image search: [Google]

421KB, 1400x933px

>>34743007
It appears bigger because of its side-by-side cockpit and canards.

>>34743766
Don't forget the large wheels and gigantic benis.

Side by sides are cool

>>34738020
>We fly our jets; the Russians sell theirs.

Almost all F-14 kills are by Iranians. Huge majority of F-15 and F-16 kills are by Israelis. Plenty of F-4 kills are by Iranians and Israelis.

>>34743007
Su-27 empty weight is bit under 17 tons, typical weight on mission is 23 tons and maximum takeoff weight is 30 tons. For Su-34 numbers are 22 tons, 39 tons and 45 tons.

>>34729077
bombs people in mud huts with less cost and just as well as billion dollar equipment.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xej9unLYC-8

File: Doubt.png (85KB, 492x280px) Image search: [Google]

85KB, 492x280px

>>34745880

Does it, though?

Last time I checked, Russians claimed more kills in airstrikes than the total number of IS forces estimated to exist, let alone operate in the area, which, when you think back to WWII, really isn't anything new for them.

Also Putin's advisors took 2009 US footage of Apaches engaging ragheads in Afghanistan, voiced it over in Russian, then gave it to him saying it's Russian air force (Putin then proceeded to thoroughly embarrass himself when he used the video to brag to an American on a documentary released worldwide).
How desperate for actual footage of succesful, effective airstrikes do you have to be, exactly, to do that?

File: 1489945621498.jpg (182KB, 800x999px) Image search: [Google]

182KB, 800x999px

>get intercepted
>start evading
>go inverted
>toilet empties all over inside of plane
>windshield covered in piss
>coffee pot flies off minibar
>opens the door
>gets on the floor
>russians keep flying dinosaurs

>>34746536
>toilet empties all over inside of plane
Nigh impossible to happen anon, unless Vladimir forgets to close the two top hatches that is..

>>34740976
Your nostalgia goggles lead you astray. There is literally no reason to play BF2 beyond just getting your quick 15 minute nostalgia fix before realizing how shit and dated it is.

PF is the only reason to ever touch the BF2 engine ever again.

>>34746482
Oh. I was basing it on that Russia has pushed ISIS back in one area further than our 15 year war in Iraq/Afghanistan did. It's almost the only metric you can use with regards to effectiveness.

File: 1492713156726.gif (1022KB, 292x191px) Image search: [Google]

1022KB, 292x191px

>>34746536

>>34746482
>Russians claimed more kills in airstrikes
>total number of IS forces
>IS
You know that Russia is bombing not only IS, but moderate beheaders too, right?

>>34729077
She thicc asf