Help me /k/. Best day/night sights for glock?
XS tritium or nothing
>>34715400
Stock because Perfection™ :^)
I have some of the mepro or whatever the fuck the factory night sights are. It's on a babby glock used for cc so they don't really matter anyway.
They are ok.
If you are going for target shooting a fiber optic front or maybe those ones with the upwards pointing arrow on the rear sight might be the way to go, though I personally have never fucked with them.
RMR, hands down. Save your money, the gen 2 version will knock the first gen down to ~350 soon
>>34716542
I have xs big dots on 3 of my glocks, a 26, 43 and a 30, all used for carry. They're great for idpa (and that type of shooting), where it's practical shooting, and only combat accuracy is needed. Hence why they're on my carry guns.
But they do suck at precision. Yes you can hit a 12" target at say 50yds with them, but they're not good at it.
If I had to hit hit a baseball at 15yds, i would use one of my glocks with more traditional sights like trijicon HDs.
Xpress sights are great, but there is a sacrifice there too.
>>34715400
Wow dude you fucking suck..... Lrn 2 group.
>>34717093
This was definitely not bird shot. This was definitely many small pellets from an air gun.
>>34717424
No you're wrong. OP sat with a .17hmr and 1000 rounds of ammo and just fired at one target for three days. There's no WAY that was a shotgun.
>>34717093
You're right anon. That OP sure is a bad shot, and you are not a moron at all.
>>34715400
Trijicon HD
I took this pic in bed for you, OP
>>34715400
I like the ameriglo front sight on my snickers edition
>>3471877
OP here, slightly turned on.
>>34715400
What brand target paper is that?
>>34715400
Get a light. Night sights are a meme.
>>34718858
Don't know the brand but they're usually called splatter targets
>>34717058
Do you think xs standard dots would be almost as quick with better precision?
I'd like to be accurate at 25 yards